Alphabeta Math
CorollaryStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedaudited 2026-09-22
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Deterministic Ito integrals are Gaussian

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice and the standing hypothesis (H) of Elementary predictable Brownian integrands. Fix T>0 and let h∈L2[0,T] be deterministic, choose a Borel representative of its Lebesgue-equivalence class, and set h(s,ω):=h(s). This process is predictable with finite energy. Then the Ito integral ∫0Ths dBs Ito integral for square-integrable predictable processes is centered normal with variance ∫0Th2ds: its law is N(0,∫0Th2ds) in the convention of Standard normal and normal laws, where N(0,0) is the Dirac law at 0. More generally, for deterministic h1,…,hd∈L2[0,T] the vector of integrals is jointly Gaussian in the sense of Multivariate normal law, including singular covariance: its law is Nd(0,Σ) with Σjk=∫0Thj(s)hk(s) ds. In particular the covariance of the pair is Cov⁡(∫hjdB,∫hkdB)=∫hjhk, the integrals are uncorrelated exactly when ∫hjhk=0, and integrals of deterministic integrands with disjoint supports are independent.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC, the standing hypothesis (H), a horizon T>0, deterministic h,h1,…,hd∈L2[0,T] represented by Borel functions, and real coefficients c1,…,cd.

[F1]

A deterministic step function is an elementary predictable integrand with deterministic coefficients, and its Ito integral is the finite sum ∑kakm(Btk+1m−Btkm); the Brownian increments over disjoint intervals are independent with laws N(0,Δk) and mean 0. Elementary predictable Brownian integrands Ito integral of an elementary predictable process Brownian motion

[F2]

A finite linear combination of independent centered normal variables is centered normal, and a N(0,σ2) variable has characteristic function t↦e−σ2t2/2, including σ=0; a Borel probability law on R is determined by its characteristic function. Characteristic functions under affine maps and independent sums Characteristic function of a normal law Uniqueness of a law from its characteristic function

[F3]

Convergence in L2(P) implies convergence in probability, which implies weak convergence of the laws. Weak convergence tests bounded continuous real functions; applying it separately to x↦cos⁡(tx) and x↦sin⁡(tx) and then combining the two real limits gives convergence of the complex characteristic functions. Convergence in probability Convergence in probability implies convergence in distribution Weak convergence of borel probability measures

[F4]

The integration map on predictable L2 is linear and isometric, and the integral of h is the L2(P)-limit of the elementary integrals of any admissible elementary approximation; the approximation hm is admissible because ∣hm−h∣ in L2(dt⊗P) equals the deterministic L2[0,T] distance. Ito isometry and linearity in predictable L2 The general Ito integral is well defined Ito integral for square-integrable predictable processes

[F5]

If hm→h in L2[0,T], the reverse triangle inequality in the stated normed space gives ∣∥hm∥2−∥h∥2∣≤∥hm−h∥2⟶0. Hence ∫0T(hm)2ds=∥hm∥22→∥h∥22=∫0Th2ds. The Lp norm descends to the quotient and makes Lp a normed space for 1≤p≤∞

[F6]

A Borel probability law on Rd is Nd(0,Σ) exactly when every projection u⋅X has law N(0,uTΣu); such a vector has mean 0 and covariance Σ. Multivariate normal law, including singular covariance

[F7]

Under AC, hence Countable Choice, finite linear combinations of box indicators are dense in L2(R). Extend h by zero outside [0,T] and approximate that extension by such a box-step function. Its restriction to [0,T] agrees almost everywhere with a function ∑kak1(tk,tk+1] after adjoining the finitely many box endpoints and 0,T to one partition. Thus deterministic step functions of the required elementary form are dense in L2[0,T]. Finite linear combinations of box indicators are dense in Lp(Rn) for 1≤p<∞ AC supplies countable selections and prescribed serial paths The Axiom of Choice

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F1F2

For a deterministic step function hm as in [F1], the integral ∑kakm(Btk+1m−Btkm) is a finite sum of independent centered normal variables with variances (akm)2Δkm, so by [F2] its law is N(0,σm2) with σm2=∑k(akm)2Δkm=∫0T(hm)2ds; in particular its characteristic function is φm(t)=e−σm2t2/2, and its mean is 0.

2.1F3F4F5F7step 1.1

For general deterministic h∈L2[0,T], choose by [F7] step functions hm→h in L2[0,T]; by [F4] the elementary integrals converge to ∫0Th dB in L2(P), hence in probability and weakly by [F3]. Apply the real-valued weak-convergence test separately to cos⁡(tx) and sin⁡(tx) and combine the limits to obtain pointwise convergence of characteristic functions: φ(t)=lim⁡mφm(t)=lim⁡me−σm2t2/2=e−σ2t2/2 with σ2=∫0Th2ds, using [F5] for the convergence of variances and continuity of the exponential.

3.1F2step 2.1

By [F2] the function t↦e−σ2t2/2 is the characteristic function of N(0,σ2) and determines a unique Borel law, so the law of ∫0Th dB is N(0,σ2); consequently it is centered with variance ∫0Th2ds, and the case σ=0 (that is, h=0 in L2) gives the Dirac law at 0.

4.1F4F6step 3.1

For a finite family, linearity [F4] gives ∑jcj∫0ThjdB=∫0T(∑jcjhj)dB in L2(P), and step 3.1 applied to the deterministic integrand ∑jcjhj shows that this projection is N(0,∫0T(∑jcjhj)2ds)=N(0,cTΣc) with Σjk=∫0Thjhkds; by [F6] the vector of the d integrals therefore has law Nd(0,Σ), hence is jointly Gaussian with mean 0 and covariance Σ.

5.1F6F7step 4.1given∎

The covariance identity is the jk entry of Σ; the zero-covariance case is uncorrelatedness, which for the jointly Gaussian pair means independence, and disjoint supports make every mixed integral ∫hjhk vanish, so the corresponding integrals are independent. Deterministic integrands are the only class treated here. AC supplies the inherited ambient interfaces and the Countable Choice hypothesis of the deterministic density theorem recorded in [F7]; no further approximation premise is assumed.

Source notes

Lawler, Exercise 3.8, states that deterministic integrands produce Gaussian integrals with variance equal to the squared L2 norm, and Section 3.2 built the step-function case from independent Gaussian increments. The corollary here identifies the limit law by characteristic functions rather than by citing a weak-convergence theorem for Gaussian parameter families, so that every supplier lies on an earlier page of this track; the multivariate clause is the defining projection property of the multivariate normal law.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

85 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources