How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Brownian covariance is equivalent to independent stationary normal increments
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let be a real process with almost surely. The following are equivalent:
- is a centered Gaussian process with for all .
- For every finite list , the increments , , are mutually independent and have laws .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: AC, a real process with almost surely, and either condition 1 or condition 2.
Finite evaluation vectors of a Gaussian process are possibly singular multivariate normal, and every finite linear combination is normal. Gaussian process
Under AC, exists for every positive semidefinite and has a realization with independent standard normal coordinates. Multivariate normal law, including singular covariance
Under AC, the characteristic function of is and uniquely determines the vector law. Characteristic function of a multivariate normal law
A scalar law has characteristic function , including . Characteristic function of a normal law
Characteristic functions respect affine maps and multiply for finite sums of mutually independent real random variables. Characteristic functions under affine maps and independent sums
Under AC, equality of scalar characteristic functions determines the law. Uniqueness of a law from its characteristic function
Mutual independence is the finite measurable-rectangle factorization property and hence depends only on the joint law. Independent random elements are characterized by finite rectangle probabilities
Products of integrable functions of independent random variables factor in expectation. Expectations factor over finite products of independent random variables
Proof
Assume condition 1 and fix . By [F1], the increment vector is multivariate normal. It is centered, and If , expanding the four covariance terms and using gives Thus for , by [F3].
Conversely assume condition 2. Given any finite time list, discard repetitions only for the construction and write its distinct positive values as . Put . Then condition 2 makes these independent with , and telescoping with gives almost surely at every time in the original list.
By [F2], is also the joint law of the vector with independent standard normals . The joint-law identity in step 1.1 transfers every measurable-rectangle probability, so [F7] makes the mutually independent; their one-coordinate laws are . For this is the vacuous empty family. Hence condition 2 holds.
For coefficients attached to the original time list, step 1.2 rewrites By [F4]–[F5], its characteristic function is By [F4] and [F6], this is a centered normal law, including the empty sum and variance zero. Since the list and coefficients were arbitrary, [F1] makes a centered Gaussian process.
For , condition 2 decomposes into independent centered normal variables. Consequently [F8] gives while both means are zero by step 2.2; symmetry gives for every order of . The cases , , and follow from the same formula and almost surely. Thus condition 1 holds. AC is used exactly in [F1]–[F4] and [F6], for the library's normal-law constructions and characteristic-function uniqueness; no path regularity is asserted.
Source notes
Yoshida's Lemma 6.1.3, printed pp. 173–174, proves both directions, including Gaussianity from independent normal increments. Sousi, Sections 6.1–6.2, uses the same characterization. The reverse direction here is stated for an arbitrary process, repairing the scaffold's circular assumption that the process was already Gaussian.
Depends on
- Gaussian process
- Multivariate normal law, including singular covariance
- Characteristic function of a multivariate normal law
- Characteristic function of a normal law
- Characteristic functions under affine maps and independent sums
- Uniqueness of a law from its characteristic function
- Expectations factor over finite products of independent random variables
- Independent random elements are characterized by finite rectangle probabilities
- The Axiom of Choice
Used by
- Brownian motion Definition
- Brownian finite-dimensional density Example
- Covariance of overlapping Brownian increments Example
- Brownian scaling Theorem
- Brownian time inversion Theorem
- Existence of continuous Brownian motion Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
52 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Perla Sousi, Advanced Probability, Sections 6.1-6.2 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Nobuaki Yoshida, Probability Theory, Lemma 6.1.3 (standard reference, not scraped)