Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-14
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Brownian covariance is equivalent to independent stationary normal increments

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let X=(Xt)t0 be a real process with X0=0 almost surely. The following are equivalent:

  1. X is a centered Gaussian process with Cov(Xs,Xt)=min(s,t) for all s,t0.
  2. For every finite list 0=t0<t1<<tn, the increments XtjXtj1, 1jn, are mutually independent and have laws N(0,tjtj1).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC, a real process X with X0=0 almost surely, and either condition 1 or condition 2.

[F1]

Finite evaluation vectors of a Gaussian process are possibly singular multivariate normal, and every finite linear combination is normal. Gaussian process

[F2]

Under AC, Nn(m,Σ) exists for every positive semidefinite Σ and has a realization m+Σ1/2Z with independent standard normal coordinates. Multivariate normal law, including singular covariance

[F3]

Under AC, the characteristic function of Nn(m,Σ) is uexp(iumuTΣu/2) and uniquely determines the vector law. Characteristic function of a multivariate normal law

[F4]

A scalar N(m,σ2) law has characteristic function uexp(imuσ2u2/2), including σ=0. Characteristic function of a normal law

[F5]

Characteristic functions respect affine maps and multiply for finite sums of mutually independent real random variables. Characteristic functions under affine maps and independent sums

[F6]

Under AC, equality of scalar characteristic functions determines the law. Uniqueness of a law from its characteristic function

[F7]

Mutual independence is the finite measurable-rectangle factorization property and hence depends only on the joint law. Independent random elements are characterized by finite rectangle probabilities

[F8]

Products of integrable functions of independent random variables factor in expectation. Expectations factor over finite products of independent random variables

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Assume condition 1 and fix 0=t0<t1<<tn. By [F1], the increment vector Δ=(XtjXtj1)j=1n is multivariate normal. It is centered, and Var(Δj)=tjtj1. If i<j, expanding the four covariance terms and using ti1<titj1<tj gives Cov(Δi,Δj)=tititi1+ti1=0. Thus ΔNn(0,D) for D=diag(tjtj1), by [F3].

givenF1F3algebra
1.2

Conversely assume condition 2. Given any finite time list, discard repetitions only for the construction and write its distinct positive values as 0=r0<r1<<rk. Put Δ=XrXr1. Then condition 2 makes these independent with ΔN(0,rr1), and telescoping with X0=0 gives Xt=:rtΔ almost surely at every time in the original list.

given
2.1

By [F2], Nn(0,D) is also the joint law of the vector (tjtj1Zj)j=1n with independent standard normals Zj. The joint-law identity in step 1.1 transfers every measurable-rectangle probability, so [F7] makes the Δj mutually independent; their one-coordinate laws are N(0,tjtj1). For n=0 this is the vacuous empty family. Hence condition 2 holds.

step 1.1F2F7
2.2

For coefficients a1,,am attached to the original time list, step 1.2 rewrites j=1majXtj==1kbΔ,b=j:rtjaj. By [F4]–[F5], its characteristic function is =1kexp ⁣(12u2b2(rr1))=exp ⁣(12u2=1kb2(rr1)). By [F4] and [F6], this is a centered normal law, including the empty sum and variance zero. Since the list and coefficients were arbitrary, [F1] makes X a centered Gaussian process.

step 1.2F1F4F5F6algebra
3.1

For 0st, condition 2 decomposes Xt=Xs+(XtXs) into independent centered normal variables. Consequently [F8] gives E[XsXt]=E[Xs2]+E[Xs]E[XtXs]=s, while both means are zero by step 2.2; symmetry gives Cov(Xs,Xt)=min(s,t) for every order of s,t. The cases s=0, s=t, and t=0 follow from the same formula and X0=0 almost surely. Thus condition 1 holds. AC is used exactly in [F1]–[F4] and [F6], for the library's normal-law constructions and characteristic-function uniqueness; no path regularity is asserted.

step 1.2step 2.2F4F7F8algebra

Source notes

Yoshida's Lemma 6.1.3, printed pp. 173–174, proves both directions, including Gaussianity from independent normal increments. Sousi, Sections 6.1–6.2, uses the same characterization. The reverse direction here is stated for an arbitrary process, repairing the scaffold's circular assumption that the process was already Gaussian.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

52 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources