How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Brownian finite-dimensional density
Example
Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let be a standard Brownian motion and let , where . Put and . Then the law of has, with respect to Lebesgue measure on , the density
Facts & Assumptions
Given: AC, a standard Brownian motion , and with ; write .
Brownian increments are mutually independent and have laws . Brownian motion, Brownian covariance is equivalent to independent stationary normal increments.
Under AC, has density , and is the pushforward under . Standard normal and normal laws.
Independent random elements have product joint law. Independent random elements have product joint law.
A nonnegative measurable function defines a measure by indefinite integration; sigma-finite product measures exist, have the rectangle formula, and are unique. The indefinite integral of a nonnegative measurable function is a measure, For sigma-finite factors, the product measure exists, has the rectangle formula, is sigma-finite, and is unique.
Tonelli holds for nonnegative product-measurable functions, and finite products of one-dimensional Lebesgue measure agree with Euclidean Lebesgue measure on Borel sets. Tonelli's theorem for nonnegative measurable functions on a sigma-finite product, On Borel subsets of R^{m+n}, the product lambda_m times lambda_n agrees with lambda_{m+n}.
The declared supplier
lem-c-one-change-of-variables-for-nonnegative-borel-functions-via-radon-uniqueness
gives: assuming countable choice, a diffeomorphism satisfies
for every nonnegative Borel .
Continuous partial derivatives give the total derivative, whose matrix is the Jacobian, and a triangular matrix has determinant equal to the product of its diagonal entries. If all partial derivatives exist on a neighbourhood and are continuous at a point, then the map is totally differentiable there with Jacobian derivative, The determinant of a triangular matrix is the product of its diagonal entries.
The declared supplier
thm-choice-implies-dependent-implies-countable-choice gives that AC implies
countable choice, and The Axiom of Choice fixes the ambient assumption.
Verification
For each , let and For a Borel set , apply [F6] to the dilation and the nonnegative Borel function . Since , this gives By the pushforward definition in [F2], is therefore a density of .
Define and by Direct telescoping gives . Their coordinate partial derivatives are constant, so [F7] makes them with their displayed matrices. The matrix of is lower triangular with every diagonal entry one; hence . Thus is a diffeomorphism with inverse . Moreover, almost surely by telescoping and almost surely.
Put . Induction on , using Tonelli and the Borel equality , shows that the measure has on every Borel rectangle the value . The base is step 1.1; the induction also gives . Thus [F4] and uniqueness of the product measure identify with the product of the laws. By [F1] and [F3], is exactly the joint law of .
For a Borel set , step 2.1 and the almost-sure identity in step 1.2 give Apply [F6] to and . Because and , the right side becomes Substituting the formula from step 1.1 is exactly the stated density.
The strict inequalities make every positive, so no division by zero or singular normal density occurs. For , the formula is the density with ; the empty case is excluded. The triangular determinant is one even when . AC is used through the Brownian and normal-law suppliers, and it supplies the countable choice required by [F5] and [F6]; the finite triangular transformation makes no additional choice.
Remarks
- The suppliers of [F6] and [F8] are homed on
euclidean-surface-measure-divergence-and-green-identities(order 458.0021) andweak-choice-principles-and-sierpinskis-theorem(order 665), while this examples page has order 288.132. Step-5b resolution moved those citations from item-levelforward_refstodeps, since both suppliers are published and load bearing, and [F6] and [F8] name them by ID rather than linking because their A pages sit the other way along the reading order. The batch-2 manifest whitelists both pages under this page'sforwardRefs, so the page-level dependency is declared as well; rehoming this example to either of those subjects would be an owner-only reading-order change.
Source notes
Sousi, Section 6.1 (printed p. 51), supplies the Brownian independent-increment structure. The density and the triangular change-of-variables calculation are derived explicitly above from the library's normal-density, product-measure, and Borel change-of-variables results.
Depends on
- Brownian motion
- Brownian covariance is equivalent to independent stationary normal increments
- Standard normal and normal laws
- Independent random elements have product joint law
- The indefinite integral of a nonnegative measurable function is a measure
- For sigma-finite factors, the product measure exists, has the rectangle formula, is sigma-finite, and is unique
- Tonelli's theorem for nonnegative measurable functions on a sigma-finite product
- On Borel subsets of R^{m+n}, the product lambda_m times lambda_n agrees with lambda_{m+n}
- If all partial derivatives exist on a neighbourhood and are continuous at a point, then the map is totally differentiable there with Jacobian derivative
- The determinant of a triangular matrix is the product of its diagonal entries
- Borel change of variables from the compact-support formula and Radon uniqueness
- AC implies DC implies countable choice
- The Axiom of Choice
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
73 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Perla Sousi, Advanced Probability, Section 6.1 (standard reference, not scraped)