Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-14
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Brownian finite-dimensional density

Example

Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let B be a standard Brownian motion and let 0<t1<<tn, where n1. Put t0=0 and x0=0. Then the law of (Bt1,,Btn) has, with respect to Lebesgue measure on Rn, the density

p(x1,,xn)=j=1n12π(tjtj1)exp ⁣((xjxj1)22(tjtj1)).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC, a standard Brownian motion B, and 0<t1<<tn with n1; write hj=tjtj1>0.

[F1]

Brownian increments Δj=BtjBtj1 are mutually independent and have laws N(0,hj). Brownian motion, Brownian covariance is equivalent to independent stationary normal increments.

[F2]

Under AC, N(0,1) has density ϕ(z)=ez2/2/2π, and N(0,h) is the pushforward under zhz. Standard normal and normal laws.

[F3]

Independent random elements have product joint law. Independent random elements have product joint law.

[F4]

A nonnegative measurable function defines a measure by indefinite integration; sigma-finite product measures exist, have the rectangle formula, and are unique. The indefinite integral of a nonnegative measurable function is a measure, For sigma-finite factors, the product measure exists, has the rectangle formula, is sigma-finite, and is unique.

[F5]

Tonelli holds for nonnegative product-measurable functions, and finite products of one-dimensional Lebesgue measure agree with Euclidean Lebesgue measure on Borel sets. Tonelli's theorem for nonnegative measurable functions on a sigma-finite product, On Borel subsets of R^{m+n}, the product lambda_m times lambda_n agrees with lambda_{m+n}.

[F6]

The declared supplier lem-c-one-change-of-variables-for-nonnegative-borel-functions-via-radon-uniqueness gives: assuming countable choice, a C1 diffeomorphism T:UV satisfies Vf=U(fT)detDT for every nonnegative Borel f.

[F7]

Continuous partial derivatives give the total derivative, whose matrix is the Jacobian, and a triangular matrix has determinant equal to the product of its diagonal entries. If all partial derivatives exist on a neighbourhood and are continuous at a point, then the map is totally differentiable there with Jacobian derivative, The determinant of a triangular matrix is the product of its diagonal entries.

[F8]

The declared supplier thm-choice-implies-dependent-implies-countable-choice gives that AC implies countable choice, and The Axiom of Choice fixes the ambient assumption.

Verification

technique · direct
1.1

For each j, let σj=hj>0 and gj(y)=1σjϕ(y/σj)=12πhjey2/(2hj). For a Borel set AR, apply [F6] to the dilation Tj(z)=σjz and the nonnegative Borel function 1Agj. Since Tj=σj, this gives Agj(y)dy=R1A(σjz)gj(σjz)σjdz=R1A(σjz)ϕ(z)dz. By the pushforward definition in [F2], gj is therefore a density of N(0,hj).

F2F6F8
1.2

Define T:RnRn and S:RnRn by (Ty)j=k=1jyk,(Sx)j=xjxj1,x0=0. Direct telescoping gives ST=TS=id. Their coordinate partial derivatives are constant, so [F7] makes them C1 with their displayed matrices. The matrix of S is lower triangular with every diagonal entry one; hence detDS=1. Thus S is a C1 diffeomorphism with inverse T. Moreover, TΔ=(Bt1,,Btn) almost surely by telescoping and B0=0 almost surely.

F1F7algebra
2.1

Put q(y1,,yn)=j=1ngj(yj). Induction on n, using Tonelli and the Borel equality λn1×λ1=λn, shows that the measure Q(E)=Eqdλn has on every Borel rectangle the value jAjgjdλ1. The base n=1 is step 1.1; the induction also gives Q(Rn)=1. Thus [F4] and uniqueness of the product measure identify Q with the product of the N(0,hj) laws. By [F1] and [F3], Q is exactly the joint law of Δ=(Δ1,,Δn).

step 1.1F1F3F4F5
3.1

For a Borel set ARn, step 2.1 and the almost-sure identity in step 1.2 give P((Bt1,,Btn)A)=T1Aq(y)dy. Apply [F6] to S and f(y)=1T1A(y)q(y). Because T(Sx)=x and detDS=1, the right side becomes Rn1A(x)q(Sx)dx=Aj=1ngj(xjxj1)dx. Substituting the formula from step 1.1 is exactly the stated density.

step 1.1step 2.1step 1.2F6F8
4.1

The strict inequalities make every hj positive, so no division by zero or singular normal density occurs. For n=1, the formula is the N(0,t1) density with x0=t0=0; the empty case n=0 is excluded. The triangular determinant is one even when n=1. AC is used through the Brownian and normal-law suppliers, and it supplies the countable choice required by [F5] and [F6]; the finite triangular transformation makes no additional choice.

givenstep 1.1step 1.2step 3.1F1F2F5F6F8

Remarks

  • The suppliers of [F6] and [F8] are homed on euclidean-surface-measure-divergence-and-green-identities (order 458.0021) and weak-choice-principles-and-sierpinskis-theorem (order 665), while this examples page has order 288.132. Step-5b resolution moved those citations from item-level forward_refs to deps, since both suppliers are published and load bearing, and [F6] and [F8] name them by ID rather than linking because their A pages sit the other way along the reading order. The batch-2 manifest whitelists both pages under this page's forwardRefs, so the page-level dependency is declared as well; rehoming this example to either of those subjects would be an owner-only reading-order change.

Source notes

Sousi, Section 6.1 (printed p. 51), supplies the Brownian independent-increment structure. The density and the triangular change-of-variables calculation are derived explicitly above from the library's normal-density, product-measure, and Borel change-of-variables results.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

73 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources