Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passaudited 2026-08-29
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

For sigma-finite factors, the product measure exists, has the rectangle formula, is sigma-finite, and is unique

Statement

Let (X,A,μ) and (Y,B,ν) be sigma-finite measure spaces. Then:

  1. the set function E(μ×ν)(E) of The product measure of two sigma-finite measure spaces is a measure on AB;
  2. for measurable rectangles, (μ×ν)(A×B)=μ(A)ν(B);
  3. the measure μ×ν is sigma-finite; and
  4. it is the unique measure on AB with the rectangle formula.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Sigma-finite measure spaces (X,A,μ) and (Y,B,ν).

[L1]

For every product-measurable set E, (μ×ν)(E)=Xν(Ex)dμ=Yμ(Ey)dν. (The product measure of two sigma-finite measure spaces)

[L2]

Monotone convergence passes increasing limits through nonnegative integrals. (Monotone convergence for the integral)

[L3]

A measure is determined by its values on a sigma-finite generating pi-system. (Measures agreeing on a generating pi-system are equal under an increasing finite-measure exhaustion from that pi-system)

[A1]

Measurable rectangles form a pi-system that generates AB.

[A2]

Since μ and ν are sigma-finite, there are measurable exhaustions XnX and YnY with μ(Xn),ν(Yn)<.

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

If E=A×B is a measurable rectangle, then (A×B)x={B,xA,,xA, so (μ×ν)(A×B)=Xν((A×B)x)dμ=Xν(B)1A(x)dμ=μ(A)ν(B). This is the rectangle formula.

L1
1.2

Let E1,E2, be pairwise disjoint measurable subsets of X×Y, and put FN:=kNEk. Then (FN)x=kN(Ek)x is a disjoint union, so ν((FN)x)=kNν((Ek)x) for every x. Therefore (μ×ν)(FN)=XkNν((Ek)x)dμ. Since FNk1Ek, [L2] gives (μ×ν)(k1Ek)=k1(μ×ν)(Ek). Thus μ×ν is a measure.

L1L2
2.1

By [A2] and step 1.1, each rectangle Xn×Yn has finite product measure (μ×ν)(Xn×Yn)=μ(Xn)ν(Yn)<, and n(Xn×Yn)=X×Y. Hence μ×ν is sigma-finite.

A2step 1.1
3.1

Let ρ be another measure on AB with the same rectangle formula. Step 1.1 shows that ρ and μ×ν agree on the generating pi-system of measurable rectangles, and step 2.1 gives the required sigma-finite exhaustion. Therefore [L3] implies ρ=μ×ν on all of AB. This proves existence, the rectangle formula, sigma-finiteness, and uniqueness.

A1L3step 1.1step 2.1

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

29 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources