Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passaudited 2026-08-29
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

For sigma-finite measures, the two section-measure integrals of a measurable set agree

Statement

Let (X,A,μ) and (Y,B,ν) be sigma-finite measure spaces, and let EAB. Then

Xν(Ex)dμ=Yμ(Ey)dν.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Sigma-finite measure spaces (X,A,μ) and (Y,B,ν), and a set EAB.

[L1]

The section-measure functions xν(Ex) and yμ(Ey) are measurable. (For sigma-finite measures, the section-measure functions are measurable)

[L2]

Finite disjoint unions of measurable rectangles form an algebra generating AB. (Finite disjoint unions of measurable rectangles form an algebra generating the product sigma-algebra)

[L3]

The monotone class generated by an algebra coincides with the generated sigma-algebra. (The monotone class generated by an algebra equals the sigma-algebra it generates)

[L4]

Monotone convergence allows integrals of increasing nonnegative functions to pass to the limit. (Monotone convergence for the integral)

[A1]

Since μ and ν are sigma-finite, there are measurable exhaustions XnX and YnY with μ(Xn),ν(Yn)<.

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Fix n,m1. Let Dn,m be the family of measurable subsets FXn×Ym such that Xnν(Fx)dμ=Ymμ(Fy)dν. If F=(A×B)(Xn×Ym), then Fx=(BYm) for xAXn and otherwise, so both integrals equal μ(AXn)ν(BYm). Finite additivity gives the same equality for the algebra of [L2].

L2L3A1
1.2

If FkF inside Xn×Ym, then [L1] and [L4] give Xnν((Fk)x)dμXnν(Fx)dμ, and similarly on Ym. Thus Dn,m is a monotone class. By [L2] and [L3], every measurable subset of Xn×Ym belongs to Dn,m.

L1L4L2L3
2.1

Put En,m:=E(Xn×Ym). Step 1.2 gives Xnν((En,m)x)dμ=Ymμ((En,m)y)dν. Now (En,m)x=ExYm for xXn and otherwise, so as n,m the two integrands increase pointwise to ν(Ex) and μ(Ey).

step 1.2A1
3.1

Applying [L4] on both sides of step 2.1 and then letting n,m gives Xν(Ex)dμ=Yμ(Ey)dν. This is the claimed equality.

L4step 2.1L1

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

29 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources