Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedaudited 2026-09-22
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The Ito integral process has a continuous martingale version

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice and the standing hypothesis (H) of Elementary predictable Brownian integrands. Let H be a predictable process with E∫0THs2ds<∞ for every finite T. Then there is an adapted process M=(Mt)t≥0 with continuous paths such that Mt=∫0tHs dBs almost surely for every t≥0 Ito integral for square-integrable predictable processes, and M is a square-integrable martingale relative to (Ft) Continuous-time adapted processes and martingales: EMt2=E∫0tHs2ds<∞ for every t. Any two such continuous versions agree at every time on one measurable event of probability one; in particular the continuous version is unique in this common-full-measure-event sense, and it is the only continuous square-integrable martingale whose value at each deterministic t is the integral class.

This conclusion is deliberately distinguished from the exact definition of indistinguishability in Process law, modification, and indistinguishability. On a noncomplete probability space the full equality set, although it contains the measurable probability-one event constructed below, need not itself be measurable. On a complete probability space the two notions coincide, because the complement of the equality set is then a measurable subset of a null set.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC, the standing hypothesis (H), a finite-energy predictable H with E∫0TH2ds<∞ for all finite T, and a horizon T>0.

[F1]

For every δ>0 there is a bounded elementary predictable G with ∥H−G∥L2(dt⊗P)<δ. Density asserts existence, not an enumeration of all elementary integrands. Density of elementary predictable processes in predictable L2

[F2]

For elementary J the process I(J) is a continuous square-integrable martingale with E(It(J)−Is(J))2=E∫stJ2du for s≤t, and EIT(J)2=E∫0TJ2du. Ito integral of an elementary predictable process Ito isometry for elementary integrands

[F3]

Doob's L2 maximal inequality: for a discrete martingale Y0,…,YN with YN∈L2, Emax⁡k≤N∣Yk∣2≤4E∣YN∣2; the sampled family (IkT/2m(J))k is a discrete martingale for the filtration (FkT/2m)k, by the tower property. Doob Lp maximal inequality Tower property of conditional expectation

[F4]

If a sequence 0≤Zn↑Z of nonnegative random variables increases pointwise, then EZn↑EZ; the dyadic grids Dm:={kT/2m:0≤k≤2m} are nested with union a countable dense subset D of [0,T], so sup⁡q∈D∣Iq(J)∣=lim⁡mmax⁡q∈Dm∣Iq(J)∣. Monotone convergence for the integral

[F5]

The rationals are dense in R, and each rational is a limit of dyadic rationals k/2n; a continuous function on [0,T] therefore satisfies sup⁡t∈[0,T]∣f(t)∣=sup⁡q∈D∣f(q)∣. The rationals embed densely in the reals

[F6]

For every t the class ∫0tH dB is the L2(P)-limit of It(Hn) for every admissible elementary sequence Hn→H, and ∥∫0tH dB∥22=E∫0tH2ds; the integration map is linear and isometric in the predictable L2 variable. Ito integral for square-integrable predictable processes The general Ito integral is well defined Ito isometry and linearity in predictable L2

[F7]

If Xn→X in L2(P) then E∣Xn−X∣≤∥Xn−X∥2→0, and conditional expectations are L1-contractive: ∥E[Xn∣G]−E[X∣G]∥1≤E∣Xn−X∣. Cauchy-Schwarz for random variables Basic algebra and order properties of conditional expectation

[F8]

AC supplies a selection from each nonempty set of elementary representations satisfying a prescribed error tolerance, simultaneously over countably many tolerances and integer horizons. The Axiom of Choice AC supplies countable selections and prescribed serial paths

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F1F2F8given

Fix T>0 and choose, using [F8] on the nonempty sets supplied by [F1] with tolerance 2−2n, bounded elementary predictable Hn with ∥Hn−H∥L2(dt⊗P)≤2−2n; write Xtn:=It(Hn) for the continuous elementary process of [F2].

1.2F2F3F4F5

For every elementary predictable J and every S>0, writing the path supremum as its measurable version on the scaled dyadic grid, Esup⁡t≤S∣It(J)∣2≤4E∫0SJ2du: on the full-measure event where I(J) is continuous, [F5] identifies the supremum over [0,S] with the supremum over the scaled dyadic grid, [F4] writes the latter as the increasing limit of the finite maxima over the nested grids Dm, [F3] bounds Emax⁡q∈Dm∣Iq(J)∣2≤4E∣IS(J)∣2=4E∫0SJ2du for every m, and monotone convergence passes the bound to the limit.

2.1F2step 1.1step 1.2

For each n, Hn+1−Hn is elementary on a common refinement and ∥Hn+1−Hn∥L2(dt⊗P)≤2−2(n+1)+2−2n≤21−2n; applying step 1.2 to J=Hn+1−Hn gives Ean2≤4(21−2n)2=24−4n for the measurable random variable an:=sup⁡t∈D∣Xtn+1−Xtn∣, which equals the full supremum on the common event of continuity.

3.1F4step 2.1

Consequently E∑n≥12nan2=∑n≥12nEan2≤∑n≥124−3n<∞ by monotone convergence for the nonnegative series [F4], so ∑n2nan2<∞ almost surely; the Cauchy--Schwarz inequality ∑nan=∑n(2n/2an)2−n/2≤(∑n2nan2)1/2(∑n2−n)1/2 then gives ∑nan<∞ almost surely, on a measurable event AT of probability one, intersected with the common continuity event of the elementary processes.

4.1F2step 3.1

On AT the sequence Xn converges uniformly on [0,T] to a limit; put Lt:=lim sup⁡nXtn and define Mt(T):=Lt when Lt is finite, and Mt(T):=0 otherwise. This is real-valued and Ft-measurable: Lt is an extended-real measurable limit superior and its finite-value event belongs to Ft. The resulting variable satisfies Mt(T)=lim⁡nXtn almost surely for every t; on AT the paths of M(T) are continuous, being uniform limits of continuous paths.

5.1F6step 4.1

For every t∈[0,T] the sequence Xtn=It(Hn) converges to ∫0tH dB in L2(P) by [F6] applied to the truncations Hn1[0,t]→H1[0,t]; combined with step 4.1 and the almost-sure uniqueness of limits, Mt(T)=∫0tH dB almost surely for every t∈[0,T].

5.2F6step 2.1step 4.1

For every t∈[0,T], E(Mt(T))2=lim⁡nE(Xtn)2=lim⁡nE∫0t(Hn)2ds=E∫0tH2ds<∞, using [F6] and the L2-norm continuity of the elementary integrals; hence M(T) is square-integrable.

6.1F2F7step 5.1

For 0≤s≤t≤T and n, E[Xtn∣Fs]=Xsn by [F2], and step 5.1 and [F7] give Xtn→Mt(T) and Xsn→Ms(T) in L1(P) as well, so [F7] lets the conditional expectations pass to the limit: E[Mt(T)∣Fs]=Ms(T) almost surely.

7.1F5step 4.1step 5.1step 6.1step 5.2

Steps 4.1, 5.1, 6.1 and 5.2 show that M(T) is an adapted continuous square-integrable martingale version on [0,T]. If N is another continuous version on [0,T], then Mq(T)=Nq almost surely for each rational q∈[0,T]; intersecting the countably many measurable full-measure events and the two continuity events, and then invoking continuity, gives Mt(T)=Nt for every t∈[0,T] on one measurable event of probability one.

8.1step 7.1F8given∎

Apply the construction on the horizons T=m, m=1,2,…; two versions on adjacent horizons agree on the smaller one by the uniqueness of step 7.1 applied there, since the restriction of the larger-horizon version is a continuous version on the smaller horizon. For t≥0 put m(t):=max⁡(1,⌈t⌉) and define Mt:=Mt(m(t)). This is well typed and Ft-measurable. On the intersection of the countably many overlap-agreement and continuity events, it coincides at every time with the compatible local versions, so its path is continuous. At each deterministic time it is a version of ∫0tH dB; hence the local martingale identities show that M is a square-integrable martingale with EMt2=E∫0tH2ds. Uniqueness on one measurable full-measure event over [0,∞) follows from the same rationals-and-continuity argument. AC supplies the approximants of step 1.1 simultaneously for all integer horizons, and is also inherited through the declared ambient interfaces.

Source notes

Van der Vaart, Theorem 5.26(i)--(iii), proves the martingale and continuity conclusions using maximal estimates and an almost-sure uniformly convergent subsequence. Lawler, Proposition 3.2.4, gives a related summable-error uniform-convergence criterion for the integrands treated there. The proof here follows the summable-error route, which is why no almost-sure-subsequence theorem is needed: the weighted series ∑n2nan2 is summable in expectation, and Cauchy--Schwarz converts it into almost-sure summability of the sup norms.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

74 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources