How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Comb Structure in co-Bird-Free Graphs — Examples
1 · Prerequisites
- Blockades, Combs and Pattern Graphs
- Comb Structure in co-Bird-Free Graphs
- Construction of the Natural Numbers
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Cauchy Sequences
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Dedekind Cuts
- Countability and Uncountability
- Finite Counting, Factorials and Binomial Coefficients
- Foundations of the Real Numbers for Analysis
- Graphs, Walks and Connectivity
- Induced Subgraphs and Hereditary Graph Classes
- Leaf Reducibility and Wonderful Families
- Quotient Blockades and Mixing Relations
- Regular Pairs and Induced Counting
- Relations, Functions, and Quotients
- Roots, Rational Powers, and Classical Inequalities
- Small-Graph Erdős-Hajnal Consequences
- Sparse Restricted Subgraphs and the Rödl–Nikiforov Theorems
- The ZFC Axioms and the Basic Set Constructions
2 · Summary
3 · Logical flowchart
4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs
None yet.
5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements
The first co-Bird witness by adjacency
Example
On six distinct vertices take exactly the edges . This graph is co-Bird and realizes the edge-plus-isolate obstruction configuration.
Facts & Assumptions
The edge-plus-isolate co-Bird obstruction supplies the following statement: Let be a finite simple co-Bird-free graph. Let be distinct vertices outside the indicated induced subgraph, with , and , and with complete to that subgraph. If induces just the edge , then cannot be mixed on and nonadjacent to .
The Bird graph and co-Bird supplies the following definition: The Bird graph is the graph on vertices with edge set So spans the bull, and is a new leaf attached to the horn vertex . The co-Bird graph is the complement of the Bird graph.
Verification
Given: The graph, vertices, sets and hypotheses in the example.
The fifteen unordered pairs split into nine edges and six nonedges . Under the latter become precisely , the Bird edges. The map is bijective and hence verifies both edges and nonedges of co-Bird.
The induced set has just edge , the nonadjacent pair is complete to it, and sees but misses . These are exactly the prohibited data of the first obstruction; the example itself contains co-Bird and therefore does not satisfy that lemma’s freeness assumption.
The second co-Bird witness by adjacency
Example
On six distinct vertices take exactly the edges . This graph is co-Bird and is the six-vertex witness for the path-plus-isolate obstruction.
Facts & Assumptions
The path-plus-isolate co-Bird obstruction supplies the following statement: Let be a finite simple co-Bird-free graph. Let be distinct vertices outside the indicated induced subgraph, with , and , and with complete to that subgraph. If induces the path and isolated vertex , then cannot be adjacent to and two consecutive vertices of the path and nonadjacent to the remaining endpoint.
The Bird graph and co-Bird supplies the following definition: The Bird graph is the graph on vertices with edge set So spans the bull, and is a new leaf attached to the horn vertex . The co-Bird graph is the complement of the Bird graph.
Verification
Given: The graph, vertices, sets and hypotheses in the example.
The complement consists exactly of the six pairs . The other nine of the fifteen pairs are the stated edges. The bijection sends these six pairs to , precisely the Bird edges, and sends the other pairs to co-Bird edges.
Here is induced, is isolated from that path, is complete to all four vertices and misses , while sees exactly among them. These are the six vertices of the co-Bird witness underlying the second obstruction. The obstruction's full hypothesis also requires a seventh vertex : add adjacent to and nonadjacent to ; the displayed induced co-Bird persists.
All E neighbourhood patterns under a complete nonedge pair
Example
Let be a finite simple co-Bird-free graph. Let be distinct vertices outside the indicated induced subgraph, with , and , and with complete to that subgraph. Let induce , with edges exactly . The 64 subsets , encoded by six adjacency bits, reduce to the empty and full subsets after imposing the two local obstruction tests. The table gives a witness for each of the 62 mixed subsets.
Facts & Assumptions
The edge-plus-isolate co-Bird obstruction supplies the following statement: Let be a finite simple co-Bird-free graph. Let be distinct vertices outside the indicated induced subgraph, with , and , and with complete to that subgraph. If induces just the edge , then cannot be mixed on and nonadjacent to .
The path-plus-isolate co-Bird obstruction supplies the following statement: Let be a finite simple co-Bird-free graph. Let be distinct vertices outside the indicated induced subgraph, with , and , and with complete to that subgraph. If induces the path and isolated vertex , then cannot be adjacent to and two consecutive vertices of the path and nonadjacent to the remaining endpoint.
Complete nonedge pairs force purity on induced E graphs supplies the following statement: Let be a finite simple co-Bird-free graph. Let be distinct vertices outside the indicated induced subgraph, with , and , and with complete to that subgraph. Let induce , with edges exactly . Then is pure to . In particular, in an -comb with an outside vertex complete to all blocks and anticomplete to all teeth, each , , is pure to every induced in .
The -graph and co- supplies the following definition: The -graph is the graph on vertices with edge set Thus is a five-vertex path and is a leaf attached to its middle vertex . The co- graph is the complement of this graph.
Verification
Given: The graph, vertices, sets and hypotheses in the example.
For any row of type I the five-edge list verifies an induced edge-plus-isolate with adjacency bits ; type II verifies an induced path-plus-isolate with bits . The respective obstruction forbids that row under the common complete-nonedge-pair hypotheses. All witness vertices lie in , so the required outside vertices remain outside.
The symbolic proof of induced- purity also groups these possibilities exhaustively: constant adjacency on the five-vertex path forces the matching value at ; mixing on either terminal edge is impossible; equal terminal-pair values force the middle value; opposite terminal-pair values give the final contradiction. Consequently every mixed six-bit assignment is excluded without relying on a smoke test. The table supplies one direct witness for each such assignment.
For mask , type I lacks its required neighbour and type II lacks three required neighbours. For mask , type I lacks its two required nonneighbours and type II lacks its required nonneighbour. Hence neither local test rejects either constant mask, and exactly these two of the 64 subsets survive the tests. This is a statement about the two tests, not a sufficiency assertion for freeness of an arbitrary ambient graph.
Adjacency table
Each mask is in order . Type I lists : edge , isolate , adjacency bits . Type II lists : path , isolate , bits . Thus every row is an explicit prohibited induced configuration, checkable against the five-edge list.
| Mask | Type | Ordered witness |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | I | |
| 2 | I | |
| 3 | I | |
| 4 | I | |
| 5 | I | |
| 6 | I | |
| 7 | I | |
| 8 | I | |
| 9 | I | |
| 10 | I | |
| 11 | I | |
| 12 | I | |
| 13 | I | |
| 14 | I | |
| 15 | I | |
| 16 | I | |
| 17 | I | |
| 18 | I | |
| 19 | I | |
| 20 | I | |
| 21 | I | |
| 22 | I | |
| 23 | I | |
| 24 | I | |
| 25 | I | |
| 26 | I | |
| 27 | II | |
| 28 | I | |
| 29 | I | |
| 30 | I | |
| 31 | II | |
| 32 | I | |
| 33 | I | |
| 34 | I | |
| 35 | I | |
| 36 | I | |
| 37 | I | |
| 38 | I | |
| 39 | II | |
| 40 | I | |
| 41 | I | |
| 42 | I | |
| 43 | I | |
| 44 | I | |
| 45 | I | |
| 46 | I | |
| 47 | II | |
| 48 | I | |
| 49 | I | |
| 50 | I | |
| 51 | II | |
| 52 | I | |
| 53 | I | |
| 54 | I | |
| 55 | II | |
| 56 | I | |
| 57 | II | |
| 58 | I | |
| 59 | II | |
| 60 | II | |
| 61 | II | |
| 62 | II |
The no-E-copy boundary case of the comb partition
Example
Let and . The one-tooth -comb has special vertex . In the structural partition take , and the singleton blockade .
Facts & Assumptions
A special-vertex co-Bird-free comb admits an E-free structural partition supplies the following statement: Let be an -comb in a finite simple co-Bird-free graph , and let be outside all teeth and blocks, complete to every and anticomplete to every tooth. For every there exist disjoint sets with such that is -free, and has a partition into a nonempty ordered sequence of nonempty sets satisfying: the sequence is a pure blockade, its pattern is -free, and each individual vertex of every other comb block is pure to each . The blocks may additionally be chosen anticonnected.
Combs in a graph supplies the following definition: Let with , and let . An -comb in a graph is a sequence of pairs satisfying the conditions below. Here a vertex is complete to (respectively, anticomplete to) a set when the pair is complete (respectively, anticomplete) in the sense of def-edges-between-sets-and-pure-mixed-pairs. 1. is an -blockade; 2. the vertices are distinct; 3. the set is disjoint from every block ; and 4. for every , the vertex is complete to ; and 5. for all distinct , the vertex is anticomplete to . The vertices are the teeth of the comb.
The -graph and co- supplies the following definition: The -graph is the graph on vertices with edge set Thus is a five-vertex path and is a leaf attached to its middle vertex . The co- graph is the complement of this graph.
The Bird graph and co-Bird supplies the following definition: The Bird graph is the graph on vertices with edge set So spans the bull, and is a new leaf attached to the horn vertex . The co-Bird graph is the complement of the Bird graph.
Verification
Given: The graph, vertices, sets and hypotheses in the example.
The graph has only three vertices and hence cannot contain the six-vertex co-Bird. The single block is nonempty of size one, its tooth is outside it and complete to it, and is outside both and sees but misses . There are no distinct-tooth conditions to check.
The block contains no six-vertex , so its overlap support is empty. The singleton branch of the structural theorem gives exactly the displayed . The empty graph on and the one-vertex pattern contain no , the one-block blockade is pure, and the other-block purity condition is vacuous.
Sources
- Huang–Ju–Zhou, Erdős–Hajnal beyond the five-vertex path, §6.2, Figure 9, first witness
- Huang–Ju–Zhou, Erdős–Hajnal beyond the five-vertex path, §6.2, Figure 9, second witness
- Huang–Ju–Zhou, Erdős–Hajnal beyond the five-vertex path, §6.2, Claim 6.5.2, explicit finite expansion
- Huang–Ju–Zhou, Erdős–Hajnal beyond the five-vertex path, §6.2, Lemma 6.5, singleton boundary adaptation