Alphabeta Math
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

7 results · all verified · 3 also independently AI-judged
Every result on this page is machine-checked by a proof checker and read in full and owner-audited; the judge is an additional, independent cross-model AI review of the proofs. The 4 not AI-judged were verified by owner audit (typically over a confirmed judge false positive), not failures.

Small-Graph Erdős-Hajnal Consequences

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

This page closes the finite small-graph inventory that the earlier substitution, bull, C5, and P5 pages make possible. It first turns the existing class theorems into single-graph Erdős-Hajnal consequences for P4 and the bull, then uses primeness and substitution to classify all graphs through five vertices.

The second half records the named six-vertex figures and the recursive graphs that the later co-E and co-Bird structure pages use. Only the two already resolved six-vertex prime consequences are proved here; the later E and Bird endpoint theorems remain on their dedicated final page.

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs

CorollaryStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-09-01Open item page →

The four-vertex path has the Erdős-Hajnal property

Statement

The graph P4 has the Erdős-Hajnal property.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The four-vertex path P4.

[L1]

Every finite P4-free graph G contains a clique or a stable set of size at least V(G) (Every P4-free graph has a clique or stable set of size at least the square root of its order).

[L2]

A graph H has the Erdős-Hajnal property when the hereditary class of H-free graphs has some positive Erdős-Hajnal constant (The Erdős–Hajnal property and an Erdős–Hajnal constant for a hereditary graph class).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

By [L1], every nonempty P4-free graph G satisfies hom(G)V(G)=V(G)1/2, so the class of P4-free graphs has the positive exponent 1/2.

L1algebra
2.1

By [L2], the existence of that positive exponent is exactly the statement that P4 has the Erdős-Hajnal property.

step 1.1L2
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-09-01Open item page →

Every graph on at most four vertices has the Erdős-Hajnal property

Statement

Every finite graph H with V(H)4 has the Erdős-Hajnal property.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A finite graph H with V(H)4.

[L1]

Every graph on at most three vertices has the Erdős-Hajnal property (Every graph on at most three vertices has the Erdős–Hajnal property).

[L2]

The graph P4 has the Erdős-Hajnal property (The four-vertex path has the Erdős-Hajnal property).

[L3]

Every prime graph on at least four vertices contains an induced P4 (Every prime graph on at least four vertices contains an induced P_4).

[F1]

If V(H)=4 and H contains an induced P4, then that induced copy uses all four vertices, so HP4.

[F2]

If HH1[vH2] and V(H)=4 with V(H1),V(H2)2, then V(H1)+V(H2)1=4, so each factor has at most three vertices.

Proof

technique · cases
1.1

[assume-case small] If V(H)3, then [L1] already gives the Erdős-Hajnal property for H.

L1
1.2

[assume-case four] Assume V(H)=4. We distinguish whether H is prime.

givencases
2.1

[assume-case prime] Suppose that H is prime. Then [L3] gives an induced P4 in H, and [F1] forces HP4. Therefore H has the Erdős-Hajnal property by [L2].

step 1.2L2L3F1
2.2

[assume-case nonprime] Suppose that H is not prime. Since V(H)=42, [L4] yields a substitution representation HH1[vH2] with V(H1),V(H2)2. By [F2], both factors have at most three vertices, so [L1] gives the Erdős-Hajnal property for H1 and H2. Applying [L5], the substitution H also has the Erdős-Hajnal property.

step 1.2L1L4L5F2
3.1

The cases in steps 1.1, 2.1, and 2.2 exhaust all graphs with at most four vertices. Hence every such graph has the Erdős-Hajnal property.

step 1.1step 2.1step 2.2cases-exhaustive
CorollaryStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-01 rests on unproved material (inherited)Open item page →
Rests on 3 statements not proved in this library, by way of the results it cites. This item cites no such statement directly; it depends on results that do. The unproved premises it inherits are Strong Perfect Graph Theorem, Substituting perfect graphs preserves perfection and Weak Perfect Graph Theorem. Each is recorded with a citation to the literature and is not established here, because the track that would prove it has not yet been developed in this library. Everything else in this proof is proved here.

The bull graph has the Erdős-Hajnal property

Statement

The bull graph has the Erdős-Hajnal property.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The bull graph.

[L1]

Every bull-free finite graph contains a clique or a stable set of size at least V(G)1/4, so bull-free graphs have Erdős-Hajnal constant 1/4 (Every bull-free graph has a clique or stable set of size at least V(G)1/4).

[L2]

A graph H has the Erdős-Hajnal property exactly when the hereditary class of H-free graphs has a positive Erdős-Hajnal constant (The Erdős–Hajnal property and an Erdős–Hajnal constant for a hereditary graph class).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

By [L1], the hereditary class of bull-free graphs has the positive exponent 1/4.

L1
2.1

By [L2], that is exactly the statement that the bull graph has the Erdős-Hajnal property.

step 1.1L2
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-09-01Open item page →

The prime five-vertex graphs are exactly the bull, C5, P5, and P5

Statement

A finite graph on five vertices is prime if and only if it is isomorphic to one of the following four graphs: the bull, C5, P5, or P5.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A finite graph G with V(G)=5.

[L1]

Every prime graph on at least four vertices contains an induced P4 (Every prime graph on at least four vertices contains an induced P_4).

[L3]

The standard graphs P5 and C5 have their usual path and cycle edge sets, and graph complementation replaces edges by the missing pairs (Empty and complete graphs, complete bipartite graphs, and the convention that Pn and Cn have n vertices, Graph isomorphisms, automorphisms and graph complements).

[L4]

The bull is the graph obtained from a triangle by attaching leaves to two distinct triangle vertices (The bull graph).

[F1]

A vertex set is a module of G if and only if it is a module of G, because an outside vertex is complete or anticomplete to the set in G exactly when it is anticomplete or complete to it in G.

Proof

technique · cases
1.1

[assume-case forward] Assume first that G is prime. By [L1], there is an induced path p1p2p3p4 in G. Let x be the fifth vertex. We classify the neighbourhood NG(x){p1,p2,p3,p4}.

L1givenchoosecases
1.2

[assume-case reverse] Conversely, each of the listed graphs is prime. For P5 on vertices 1,2,3,4,5 in path order, every nontrivial proper subset is split by an outside vertex: the pairs {1,2},{2,3},{3,4},{4,5},{1,3},{1,4},{1,5},{2,4},{2,5},{3,5} are split respectively by 3,1,2,3,4,3,2,1,4,2, and the triples {1,2,3},{1,2,4},{1,2,5},{1,3,4},{1,3,5},{1,4,5},{2,3,4},{2,3,5},{2,4,5},{3,4,5} are split respectively by 4,3,3,2,4,3,1,1,3,2; every four-vertex subset is split by the omitted vertex. For C5, by cyclic symmetry, adjacent pairs are split by a neighbour of exactly one of them, nonadjacent pairs are split by their common neighbour, consecutive triples are split by the next cycle vertex, the other triple type is split by the middle omitted vertex, and a four-vertex subset is split by the omitted vertex. For the bull, writing the triangle as a,b,c with leaves y at a and z at b, every nontrivial proper subset is again split by an outside vertex: for instance {a,y} by b, {b,y} by z, {a,b} by y, {c,y} by b, {a,b,c} by y, {a,b,y} by c, and {a,y,z} by b; the remaining cases follow by the automorphism swapping (a,y) with (b,z) or by the omitted vertex when the subset has size four. Thus P5, C5, and the bull have no nontrivial modules, so [L2] makes them prime; then [F1] gives the same for P5.

L2F1L3L4cases
2.1

If x has no neighbours on the path, then x is isolated, so the four path vertices form a nontrivial module. If x has all four path vertices as neighbours, then x is isolated in the complement, and [F1] again gives a nontrivial module. Both cases contradict [L2].

step 1.1L2F1cases
2.2

If x has exactly one neighbour, then either that neighbour is an endpoint or an internal path vertex. In the endpoint case, say NG(x)={p1}, the order x,p1,p2,p3,p4 is a P5. In the internal case, say NG(x)={p2}, the set {p1,x} is a nontrivial module, since every other vertex is complete or anticomplete to that pair. Thus the only prime one-neighbour case is P5.

step 1.1L2L3cases
2.3

If x has exactly two neighbours, there are four patterns up to reversing the path: {p1,p2}, {p1,p3}, {p1,p4}, and {p2,p3}. For {p1,p2} the set {p1,x} is a module; for {p1,p3} the set {p2,x} is a module; for {p1,p4} the cycle x,p1,p2,p3,p4,x is a C5; and for {p2,p3} the vertices p1,p2,p3,x,p4 form a bull, with triangle p2p3x and leaves p1,p4. Hence the only prime two-neighbour cases are C5 and the bull.

step 1.1L2L3L4cases
2.4

If x has exactly three neighbours, then exactly one path vertex is a non-neighbour. When that non-neighbour is an endpoint, say p1, the set {p3,x} is a nontrivial module. When the unique non-neighbour is internal, say p3, the order p2,p4,p1,p3,x is an induced P5 by [L3]. Therefore the only prime three-neighbour case is P5.

step 1.1L2L3cases
3.1

Steps 2.1 through 2.4 exhaust all neighbourhood sizes of x, so every prime five-vertex graph is isomorphic to the bull, C5, P5, or P5.

step 2.1step 2.2step 2.3step 2.4cases-exhaustive
4.1

Step 3.1 proves the forward direction and step 1.2 proves the reverse direction, so the stated equivalence holds.

step 3.1step 1.2
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-09-01 rests on unproved material (inherited)Open item page →
Rests on 3 statements not proved in this library, by way of the results it cites. This item cites no such statement directly; it depends on results that do. The unproved premises it inherits are Strong Perfect Graph Theorem, Substituting perfect graphs preserves perfection and Weak Perfect Graph Theorem. Each is recorded with a citation to the literature and is not established here, because the track that would prove it has not yet been developed in this library. Everything else in this proof is proved here.

Every graph on at most five vertices has the Erdős-Hajnal property

Statement

Every finite graph H with V(H)5 has the Erdős-Hajnal property.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A finite graph H with V(H)5.

[L1]

Every graph on at most four vertices has the Erdős-Hajnal property (Every graph on at most four vertices has the Erdős-Hajnal property).

[L3]

The prime five-vertex graphs are exactly the bull, C5, P5, and P5 (The prime five-vertex graphs are exactly the bull, C5, P5, and P5).

[F1]

If HH1[vH2] and V(H)=5 with V(H1),V(H2)2, then V(H1)+V(H2)1=5, so each factor has at most four vertices.

Proof

technique · cases
1.1

[assume-case small] If V(H)4, then [L1] gives the result.

L1
1.2

[assume-case five] Assume V(H)=5. We distinguish whether H is prime.

givencases
2.1

[assume-case prime] If H is prime, then [L3] shows that H is isomorphic to one of the four graphs listed in [L2]. Therefore H has the Erdős-Hajnal property.

step 1.2L2L3
2.2

[assume-case nonprime] If H is not prime, then [L4] gives a substitution representation HH1[vH2] with V(H1),V(H2)2. By [F1] both factors have at most four vertices, so [L1] gives the Erdős-Hajnal property for H1 and H2. Applying [L5], the graph H also has the Erdős-Hajnal property.

step 1.2L1L4L5F1
3.1

The cases in steps 1.1, 2.1, and 2.2 exhaust all graphs with at most five vertices. Hence every such graph has the Erdős-Hajnal property.

step 1.1step 2.1step 2.2cases-exhaustive
DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicablejudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-01Open item page →

The left six-vertex prime H-graph

Definition

The left six-vertex prime H-graph is the graph L on vertices

{t1,t2,t3,1,2,3}

with edge set

{t1t2,t2t3,t1t3,1t1,2t2,3t3}.

Thus t1,t2,t3 span a triangle, and each i is a leaf attached only to the corresponding triangle vertex ti.

DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicablejudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-01Open item page →

The right six-vertex prime H-graph

Definition

The right six-vertex prime H-graph is the complement of the left six-vertex prime H-graph on the same labelled vertex set {t1,t2,t3,1,2,3} (The left six-vertex prime H-graph, Graph isomorphisms, automorphisms and graph complements).

CorollaryStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-01 rests on unproved material (inherited)Open item page →
Rests on 3 statements not proved in this library, by way of the results it cites. This item cites no such statement directly; it depends on results that do. The unproved premises it inherits are Strong Perfect Graph Theorem, Substituting perfect graphs preserves perfection and Weak Perfect Graph Theorem. Each is recorded with a citation to the literature and is not established here, because the track that would prove it has not yet been developed in this library. Everything else in this proof is proved here.

The two six-vertex prime H-graphs have the Erdős-Hajnal property

Statement

Both the left and the right six-vertex prime H-graphs have the Erdős-Hajnal property.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The left and right six-vertex prime H-graphs.

[L1]

The bull graph has the Erdős-Hajnal property (The bull graph has the Erdős-Hajnal property).

[L2]

For a single graph, the Erdős-Hajnal property is equivalent to virality (For a single graph, the Erdős–Hajnal property, the polynomial Rödl property, and virality are equivalent).

[L3]

Deleting a leaf from each of two forbidden graphs preserves virality (Deleting a leaf from each of two forbidden graphs preserves virality).

[F1]

In the left six-vertex prime H-graph, deleting 1 or 2 leaves a bull: after deleting 1, the triangle is t1t2t3 with leaves 2,3, and after deleting 2, the same triangle has leaves 1,3.

[F2]

The right six-vertex prime H-graph is the complement of the left one by definition.

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

By [L1] and the direction (1)(3) in [L2], the singleton family consisting only of the bull graph is viral.

L1L2
2.1

Let L be the left six-vertex prime H-graph. By [F1], if we delete 1 from one copy of L and 2 from another, both modified singleton families are the viral family {bull}. Applying [L3] with the same graph L in both leaf-deletion slots shows that the singleton family {L} is viral. Using the direction (3)(1) in [L2], we conclude that L has the Erdős-Hajnal property.

step 1.1L2L3F1
3.1

Let R be the right six-vertex prime H-graph. By [F2], we have R=L, so [L4] transfers the Erdős-Hajnal property from L to R.

step 2.1L4F2
4.1

Therefore both six-vertex prime H-graphs have the Erdős-Hajnal property.

step 2.1step 3.1
DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicablejudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-01Open item page →

The E-graph and co-E

Definition

The E-graph is the graph on vertices

{p1,p2,p3,p4,p5,q}

with edge set

{p1p2,p2p3,p3p4,p4p5,p3q}.

Thus p1p2p3p4p5 is a five-vertex path and q is a leaf attached to its middle vertex p3. The co-E graph is the complement of this graph.

DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicablejudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-01Open item page →

The Bird graph and co-Bird

Definition

The Bird graph is the graph on vertices

{x1,x2,x3,y,z,w}

with edge set

{x1x2,x2x3,x1x3,x1y,x2z,yw}.

So {x1,x2,x3,y,z} spans the bull, and w is a new leaf attached to the horn vertex y. The co-Bird graph is the complement of the Bird graph.

DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicablejudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-01Open item page →

The graphs H+ and H for two distinguished vertices

Definition

Let H be a finite graph and let u,vV(H) be distinct.

The graph H+ is obtained from H by adjoining a new vertex w adjacent to both u and v, and also adjoining the edge uv when it is not already present.

The graph H is obtained from H by adjoining a new vertex w adjacent to both u and v, and deleting the edge uv when it is present.

Thus H+ forces the distinguished pair u,v to be adjacent, while H forces it to be nonadjacent, and in both cases the new vertex w is adjacent exactly to u and v.

DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicablejudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-01Open item page →

The graphs H0,H1,,H5

Definition

Let H0 be the graph on vertices

{w,v1,v2,v3,v4,v5}

whose edge set is

{wvi:1i5}{v1v2,v2v3,v3v4,v4v5,v5v1}.

Thus H0 is the five-wheel with hub w and rim cycle v1v2v3v4v5v1.

For each i{1,2,3,4,5}, define Hi recursively from Hi1 by adjoining a new leaf vi adjacent only to vi. In particular, H1 adds a leaf at v1, and H5 adds one leaf at every rim vertex of the five-wheel.

CorollaryStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-01Open item page →

The graph H0 has the Erdős-Hajnal property

Statement

The graph H0 has the Erdős-Hajnal property.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The graph H0.

[L1]

Every graph on at most three vertices has the Erdős-Hajnal property (Every graph on at most three vertices has the Erdős–Hajnal property).

[L2]

The graph C5 has the Erdős-Hajnal property (The five-cycle has the Erdős-Hajnal property).

[L3]

Substitution of graphs is defined by replacing one vertex of a graph by a second graph and inheriting the original adjacency pattern (Substituting one graph for a vertex of another).

[F1]

If K2 has vertices u,v and one substitutes C5 for v, then the new graph consists of the C5 rim together with the remaining vertex u adjacent to every rim vertex. This is exactly the five-wheel H0.

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

By [L1], the two-vertex graph K2 has the Erdős-Hajnal property, and by [L2] so does C5.

L1L2
2.1

By [F1] and [L3], the graph H0 is obtained by substituting C5 for one vertex of K2. Therefore [L4] applies to the two graphs of step 1.1 and gives the Erdős-Hajnal property for H0.

step 1.1L3L4F1

5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements

None yet.

Sources