How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Small-Graph Erdős-Hajnal Consequences
1 · Prerequisites
- Absolute and Conditional Convergence; Rearrangement; Products
- Binary Operations, Monoids, Groups and Subgroups
- Blockades, Combs and Pattern Graphs
- Bull-Free Graphs and the Erdős-Hajnal Property
- Cographs, Perfect Patterns and Pure Pairs
- Compactness in Metric Spaces
- Completeness, Completion, and Uniform Continuity
- Construction of the Natural Numbers
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Cauchy Sequences
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Dedekind Cuts
- Continuity, IVT, EVT, and Uniform Continuity
- Countability and Uncountability
- Finite Counting, Factorials and Binomial Coefficients
- Finite Probability and the Probabilistic Method
- Finite Probability Spaces and Random Variables
- Foundations of the Real Numbers for Analysis
- Graph Colouring
- Graphs, Walks and Connectivity
- Inclusion–Exclusion, the Pigeonhole Principle and Double Counting
- Induced Subgraphs and Hereditary Graph Classes
- Iterative Sparsification and the Five-Vertex Path
- Limits of Real Functions
- limsup, liminf, and Subsequential Limits
- Metric Spaces
- Modules, Substitution and Prime Graphs
- Monotone Functions, Discontinuities, and Continuity Sets
- Monotone Sequences, Bolzano-Weierstrass, and Cauchy Completeness
- Order, Zorn's Lemma, and the Axiom of Choice
- Polynomial Rödl, Virality and Erdős–Hajnal Equivalence
- Power Series and Real-Analytic Functions
- Properties of the Integral and the Working FTC
- Pure Pairs, Forests and Path–Antipath Classes
- Ramsey Theory
- Regular Pairs and Induced Counting
- Relations, Functions, and Quotients
- Rings, Subrings, Integral Domains and Fields
- Roots, Rational Powers, and Classical Inequalities
- Sequences and Limits
- Sequences and Series of Functions; Uniform Convergence
- Series: Convergence and the Nonnegative Tests
- Sparse Restricted Subgraphs and the Rödl–Nikiforov Theorems
- Suprema and Infima
- The Derivative and the Mean Value Theorems
- The Erdős–Hajnal Property and Homogeneous Sets
- The Exponential Function
- The Five-Cycle and the Erdős-Hajnal Property
- The Logarithm and General Powers
- The Riemann Integral: Definition and Integrability
- The ZFC Axioms and the Basic Set Constructions
- Topology of ℝ
- Trees, Forests and Spanning Trees
- Vector Spaces, Linear Subspaces, Span and Direct Sums
2 · Summary
This page closes the finite small-graph inventory that the earlier substitution, bull, , and pages make possible. It first turns the existing class theorems into single-graph Erdős-Hajnal consequences for and the bull, then uses primeness and substitution to classify all graphs through five vertices.
The second half records the named six-vertex figures and the recursive graphs that the later co- and co-Bird structure pages use. Only the two already resolved six-vertex prime consequences are proved here; the later and Bird endpoint theorems remain on their dedicated final page.
3 · Logical flowchart
4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs
The four-vertex path has the Erdős-Hajnal property
Statement
The graph has the Erdős-Hajnal property.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The four-vertex path .
Every finite -free graph contains a clique or a stable set of size at least (Every -free graph has a clique or stable set of size at least the square root of its order).
A graph has the Erdős-Hajnal property when the hereditary class of -free graphs has some positive Erdős-Hajnal constant (The Erdős–Hajnal property and an Erdős–Hajnal constant for a hereditary graph class).
Proof
By [L1], every nonempty -free graph satisfies , so the class of -free graphs has the positive exponent .
By [L2], the existence of that positive exponent is exactly the statement that has the Erdős-Hajnal property.
Every graph on at most four vertices has the Erdős-Hajnal property
Statement
Every finite graph with has the Erdős-Hajnal property.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A finite graph with .
Every graph on at most three vertices has the Erdős-Hajnal property (Every graph on at most three vertices has the Erdős–Hajnal property).
The graph has the Erdős-Hajnal property (The four-vertex path has the Erdős-Hajnal property).
Every prime graph on at least four vertices contains an induced (Every prime graph on at least four vertices contains an induced P_4).
A finite graph with at least two vertices is prime exactly when it is not a nontrivial substitution (A graph with at least two vertices is prime exactly when it is not obtained by substituting one graph on at least two vertices for a vertex of another graph on at least two vertices).
Substitution preserves the Erdős-Hajnal property (Alon–Pach–Solymosi: if and have the Erdős–Hajnal property, so does the graph obtained from by substituting for a vertex).
If and contains an induced , then that induced copy uses all four vertices, so .
If and with , then , so each factor has at most three vertices.
Proof
[assume-case small] If , then [L1] already gives the Erdős-Hajnal property for .
[assume-case four] Assume . We distinguish whether is prime.
[assume-case prime] Suppose that is prime. Then [L3] gives an induced in , and [F1] forces . Therefore has the Erdős-Hajnal property by [L2].
[assume-case nonprime] Suppose that is not prime. Since , [L4] yields a substitution representation with . By [F2], both factors have at most three vertices, so [L1] gives the Erdős-Hajnal property for and . Applying [L5], the substitution also has the Erdős-Hajnal property.
The cases in steps 1.1, 2.1, and 2.2 exhaust all graphs with at most four vertices. Hence every such graph has the Erdős-Hajnal property.
The bull graph has the Erdős-Hajnal property
Statement
The bull graph has the Erdős-Hajnal property.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The bull graph.
Every bull-free finite graph contains a clique or a stable set of size at least , so bull-free graphs have Erdős-Hajnal constant (Every bull-free graph has a clique or stable set of size at least ).
A graph has the Erdős-Hajnal property exactly when the hereditary class of -free graphs has a positive Erdős-Hajnal constant (The Erdős–Hajnal property and an Erdős–Hajnal constant for a hereditary graph class).
Proof
By [L1], the hereditary class of bull-free graphs has the positive exponent .
By [L2], that is exactly the statement that the bull graph has the Erdős-Hajnal property.
The prime five-vertex graphs are exactly the bull, , , and
Statement
A finite graph on five vertices is prime if and only if it is isomorphic to one of the following four graphs: the bull, , , or .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A finite graph with .
Every prime graph on at least four vertices contains an induced (Every prime graph on at least four vertices contains an induced P_4).
A graph is prime exactly when it has no nontrivial module (Prime graphs: those whose only modules are the trivial ones, Modules of a graph, and the trivial modules).
The standard graphs and have their usual path and cycle edge sets, and graph complementation replaces edges by the missing pairs (Empty and complete graphs, complete bipartite graphs, and the convention that and have vertices, Graph isomorphisms, automorphisms and graph complements).
The bull is the graph obtained from a triangle by attaching leaves to two distinct triangle vertices (The bull graph).
A vertex set is a module of if and only if it is a module of , because an outside vertex is complete or anticomplete to the set in exactly when it is anticomplete or complete to it in .
Proof
[assume-case forward] Assume first that is prime. By [L1], there is an induced path in . Let be the fifth vertex. We classify the neighbourhood .
[assume-case reverse] Conversely, each of the listed graphs is prime. For on vertices in path order, every nontrivial proper subset is split by an outside vertex: the pairs are split respectively by , and the triples are split respectively by ; every four-vertex subset is split by the omitted vertex. For , by cyclic symmetry, adjacent pairs are split by a neighbour of exactly one of them, nonadjacent pairs are split by their common neighbour, consecutive triples are split by the next cycle vertex, the other triple type is split by the middle omitted vertex, and a four-vertex subset is split by the omitted vertex. For the bull, writing the triangle as with leaves at and at , every nontrivial proper subset is again split by an outside vertex: for instance by , by , by , by , by , by , and by ; the remaining cases follow by the automorphism swapping with or by the omitted vertex when the subset has size four. Thus , , and the bull have no nontrivial modules, so [L2] makes them prime; then [F1] gives the same for .
If has no neighbours on the path, then is isolated, so the four path vertices form a nontrivial module. If has all four path vertices as neighbours, then is isolated in the complement, and [F1] again gives a nontrivial module. Both cases contradict [L2].
If has exactly one neighbour, then either that neighbour is an endpoint or an internal path vertex. In the endpoint case, say , the order is a . In the internal case, say , the set is a nontrivial module, since every other vertex is complete or anticomplete to that pair. Thus the only prime one-neighbour case is .
If has exactly two neighbours, there are four patterns up to reversing the path: , , , and . For the set is a module; for the set is a module; for the cycle is a ; and for the vertices form a bull, with triangle and leaves . Hence the only prime two-neighbour cases are and the bull.
If has exactly three neighbours, then exactly one path vertex is a non-neighbour. When that non-neighbour is an endpoint, say , the set is a nontrivial module. When the unique non-neighbour is internal, say , the order is an induced by [L3]. Therefore the only prime three-neighbour case is .
Steps 2.1 through 2.4 exhaust all neighbourhood sizes of , so every prime five-vertex graph is isomorphic to the bull, , , or .
Step 3.1 proves the forward direction and step 1.2 proves the reverse direction, so the stated equivalence holds.
Every graph on at most five vertices has the Erdős-Hajnal property
Statement
Every finite graph with has the Erdős-Hajnal property.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A finite graph with .
Every graph on at most four vertices has the Erdős-Hajnal property (Every graph on at most four vertices has the Erdős-Hajnal property).
The bull, , , and have the Erdős-Hajnal property (The bull graph has the Erdős-Hajnal property, The five-cycle has the Erdős-Hajnal property, The five-vertex path and its complement have the Erdős-Hajnal property).
The prime five-vertex graphs are exactly the bull, , , and (The prime five-vertex graphs are exactly the bull, , , and ).
A finite graph with at least two vertices is prime exactly when it is not a nontrivial substitution (A graph with at least two vertices is prime exactly when it is not obtained by substituting one graph on at least two vertices for a vertex of another graph on at least two vertices).
Substitution preserves the Erdős-Hajnal property (Alon–Pach–Solymosi: if and have the Erdős–Hajnal property, so does the graph obtained from by substituting for a vertex).
If and with , then , so each factor has at most four vertices.
Proof
[assume-case small] If , then [L1] gives the result.
[assume-case five] Assume . We distinguish whether is prime.
[assume-case prime] If is prime, then [L3] shows that is isomorphic to one of the four graphs listed in [L2]. Therefore has the Erdős-Hajnal property.
[assume-case nonprime] If is not prime, then [L4] gives a substitution representation with . By [F1] both factors have at most four vertices, so [L1] gives the Erdős-Hajnal property for and . Applying [L5], the graph also has the Erdős-Hajnal property.
The cases in steps 1.1, 2.1, and 2.2 exhaust all graphs with at most five vertices. Hence every such graph has the Erdős-Hajnal property.
The left six-vertex prime -graph
Definition
The left six-vertex prime -graph is the graph on vertices
with edge set
Thus span a triangle, and each is a leaf attached only to the corresponding triangle vertex .
The right six-vertex prime -graph
Definition
The right six-vertex prime -graph is the complement of the left six-vertex prime -graph on the same labelled vertex set (The left six-vertex prime -graph, Graph isomorphisms, automorphisms and graph complements).
The two six-vertex prime -graphs have the Erdős-Hajnal property
Statement
Both the left and the right six-vertex prime -graphs have the Erdős-Hajnal property.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The left and right six-vertex prime -graphs.
The bull graph has the Erdős-Hajnal property (The bull graph has the Erdős-Hajnal property).
For a single graph, the Erdős-Hajnal property is equivalent to virality (For a single graph, the Erdős–Hajnal property, the polynomial Rödl property, and virality are equivalent).
Deleting a leaf from each of two forbidden graphs preserves virality (Deleting a leaf from each of two forbidden graphs preserves virality).
A graph and its complement have the same Erdős-Hajnal constants (A hereditary class has the Erdős–Hajnal property exactly when its complementary class does, with the same constants).
In the left six-vertex prime -graph, deleting or leaves a bull: after deleting , the triangle is with leaves , and after deleting , the same triangle has leaves .
The right six-vertex prime -graph is the complement of the left one by definition.
Proof
By [L1] and the direction in [L2], the singleton family consisting only of the bull graph is viral.
Let be the left six-vertex prime -graph. By [F1], if we delete from one copy of and from another, both modified singleton families are the viral family . Applying [L3] with the same graph in both leaf-deletion slots shows that the singleton family is viral. Using the direction in [L2], we conclude that has the Erdős-Hajnal property.
Let be the right six-vertex prime -graph. By [F2], we have , so [L4] transfers the Erdős-Hajnal property from to .
Therefore both six-vertex prime -graphs have the Erdős-Hajnal property.
The -graph and co-
Definition
The -graph is the graph on vertices
with edge set
Thus is a five-vertex path and is a leaf attached to its middle vertex . The co- graph is the complement of this graph.
The Bird graph and co-Bird
Definition
The Bird graph is the graph on vertices
with edge set
So spans the bull, and is a new leaf attached to the horn vertex . The co-Bird graph is the complement of the Bird graph.
The graphs and for two distinguished vertices
Definition
Let be a finite graph and let be distinct.
The graph is obtained from by adjoining a new vertex adjacent to both and , and also adjoining the edge when it is not already present.
The graph is obtained from by adjoining a new vertex adjacent to both and , and deleting the edge when it is present.
Thus forces the distinguished pair to be adjacent, while forces it to be nonadjacent, and in both cases the new vertex is adjacent exactly to and .
The graphs
Definition
Let be the graph on vertices
whose edge set is
Thus is the five-wheel with hub and rim cycle .
For each , define recursively from by adjoining a new leaf adjacent only to . In particular, adds a leaf at , and adds one leaf at every rim vertex of the five-wheel.
The graph has the Erdős-Hajnal property
Statement
The graph has the Erdős-Hajnal property.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The graph .
Every graph on at most three vertices has the Erdős-Hajnal property (Every graph on at most three vertices has the Erdős–Hajnal property).
The graph has the Erdős-Hajnal property (The five-cycle has the Erdős-Hajnal property).
Substitution of graphs is defined by replacing one vertex of a graph by a second graph and inheriting the original adjacency pattern (Substituting one graph for a vertex of another).
Substitution preserves the Erdős-Hajnal property (Alon–Pach–Solymosi: if and have the Erdős–Hajnal property, so does the graph obtained from by substituting for a vertex).
If has vertices and one substitutes for , then the new graph consists of the rim together with the remaining vertex adjacent to every rim vertex. This is exactly the five-wheel .
Proof
By [L1], the two-vertex graph has the Erdős-Hajnal property, and by [L2] so does .
By [F1] and [L3], the graph is obtained by substituting for one vertex of . Therefore [L4] applies to the two graphs of step 1.1 and gives the Erdős-Hajnal property for .
5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements
None yet.
Sources
- Maria Chudnovsky, The Erdős-Hajnal Conjecture — A Survey, Section 2
- Tung H. Nguyen, Notes on Recent Work on the Erdős-Hajnal Conjecture, Section 1
- Maria Chudnovsky, The Erdős-Hajnal Conjecture — A Survey, Theorem 2.3
- Shenwei Huang, Yiao Ju, and Yidong Zhou, Erdős-Hajnal beyond the five-vertex path, Section 1
- Tung Nguyen, Alex Scott, and Paul Seymour, Induced subgraph density. IV. New graphs with the Erdős-Hajnal property, Figure 1
- Shenwei Huang, Yiao Ju, and Yidong Zhou, Erdős-Hajnal beyond the five-vertex path, Figure 2
- Tung Nguyen, Alex Scott, and Paul Seymour, Induced subgraph density. IV. New graphs with the Erdős-Hajnal property, Theorem 1.4
- Shenwei Huang, Yiao Ju, and Yidong Zhou, Erdős-Hajnal beyond the five-vertex path, Figure 2 discussion
- Shenwei Huang, Yiao Ju, and Yidong Zhou, Erdős-Hajnal beyond the five-vertex path, Figure 4
- Shenwei Huang, Yiao Ju, and Yidong Zhou, Erdős-Hajnal beyond the five-vertex path, Figure 5
- Shenwei Huang, Yiao Ju, and Yidong Zhou, Erdős-Hajnal beyond the five-vertex path, Section 1.4
- Shenwei Huang, Yiao Ju, and Yidong Zhou, Erdős-Hajnal beyond the five-vertex path, Figure 7
- Shenwei Huang, Yiao Ju, and Yidong Zhou, Erdős-Hajnal beyond the five-vertex path, Figure 7 and Lemma 6.3 preface