Ramsey Theory
About this page
How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
✓ 15 results · all verified · 0 also independently AI-judged
Every result on this page is machine-checked by a proof checker and read in full and owner-audited; the judge is an additional, independent cross-model AI review of the proofs. The 15 not AI-judged were verified by owner audit (typically over a confirmed judge false positive), not failures.
1 · Prerequisites
Combinatorics
Real Analysis
2 · Logical flowchart
3 · Items
Definition
Finite colourings of k-element subsets, monochromatic sets, and the arrow notations N→(s,t)² and N→(r)ᵏ_c
Lemma
If m→(s-1,t)² and n→(s,t-1)², then m+n→(s,t)² for s,t≥2
Theorem
Finite graph Ramsey theorem: C(s+t-2, s-1)→(s,t)² for all positive s,t
Definition
The off-diagonal Ramsey number R(s,t) as the least N with N→(s,t)², for positive s,t
Corollary
R(s,t)≤ R(s-1,t)+R(s,t-1) for s,t≥2, and R(k,k)leC(2k-2, k-1)≤2²ᵏ⁻²
Theorem
The Ramsey number R(3,3)=6
Theorem
Erdős's finite counting bound R(k,k)>2^k/2 for every k≥3
Theorem
For positive k,c,r there is an N such that every c-colouring of [N]ᵏ has a monochromatic r-element set
Definition
The uniform Ramsey number Rₖ(r;c) as the least finite witness for c colours on k-element subsets
Definition
Rooted trees of finite sequences, levels, branches, and finite branching, with ordered finite successor sets
Theorem
König's infinity lemma: an ordered finitely branching tree with a node at every level has an infinite branch, in ZF
Lemma
Every finite colouring of ℕ has an infinite colour class, in ZF
Theorem
Infinite Ramsey theorem on ℕ: every finite colouring of [ℕ]ᵏ has an infinite monochromatic set, in ZF
Corollary
Infinite Ramsey holds for every set equipped with an injection from ℕ
Corollary
The finite uniform Ramsey theorem follows a second time from the infinite theorem by a finitely branching tree of bad finite colourings
Theorem
Canonical Ramsey theorem for pairs: on an infinite subset a colouring is constant, injective, left-dependent, or right-dependent
Lemma
Finite colour focussing extends equally coloured progressions to a longer monochromatic arithmetic progression
Theorem
Van der Waerden's theorem, strengthened so the progression and its common difference have one colour
Definition
The van der Waerden number W(k,c) as the least interval length forcing a monochromatic k-term arithmetic progression
Theorem
Schur's theorem: every finite colouring of a sufficiently long positive initial interval {1,…,N} has positive monochromatic x,y,z with x+y=z
Definition
The Schur number S(c) as the largest N for which {1,…,N} has a c-colouring with no positive monochromatic solution of x+y=z
Sources
- R. Diestel, Graph Theory, 6th ed., Chapter 9, Section 9.1
- I. B. Leader, Ramsey Theory, Sections 1.1-1.2
- J. Fox et al., Graph Ramsey Theory, Section 2.1
- R. Diestel, Graph Theory, 6th ed., Theorem 9.1.1
- Douglas West, Combinatorial Game Theory, Ramsey example
- R. Diestel, Graph Theory, 6th ed., Theorem 9.1.3
- I. B. Leader, Ramsey Theory, Corollary 3
- I. B. Leader, Ramsey Theory, compactness proof after Corollary 3
- I. B. Leader, Ramsey Theory, proof of Theorem 1
- R. Diestel, Graph Theory, 6th ed., Theorem 9.1.2
- I. B. Leader, Ramsey Theory, Theorems 1-2
- I. B. Leader, Ramsey Theory, Theorem 4
- I. B. Leader, Ramsey Theory, Section 1.2, colour-focussing proof
- I. B. Leader, Ramsey Theory, Theorems 6 and 8
- I. B. Leader, Ramsey Theory, Section 1.2
- I. B. Leader, Ramsey Theory, remark after Theorem 8