How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced — the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted — a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated — a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Exponentiation of natural numbers, , and its agreement with the integer power in
Definition
Let . By the recursion theorem (The recursion theorem) applied to the set , the starting element and the function (Multiplication of natural numbers), there is a unique function , written , with
Both the base and the value are natural numbers, so for all . In particular and .
Why a new item is needed. Integer powers defines for a real base , so its value is a real number. The counts on this page, and among them, are natural numbers, and an identity between them has to be an identity in . The two operations are related by clause (d) below and by nothing weaker.
(a) and for . The first is the base clause. For the second, , the clause being definitional (Multiplication of natural numbers), and every is a successor.
(b) for every . Induction: , and (Zero and one under multiplication, The principle of mathematical induction).
(c) and . Both by induction on , using associativity and commutativity of multiplication (Multiplication is associative, Multiplication is commutative). For the first, at we have , and , using (Addition of natural numbers). For the second, at both sides are , and .
(d) The bridge into . With the canonical natural (The canonical natural of a field) and the integer power of Integer powers ,
Induction on : at both sides are , since ; and , the second equality being the multiplicativity of (clause 0 of Laws of finite sums and products in , and ) and the last the recursion clause of Integer powers .
(e) is a constant product. , the -valued product of the constant list (Finite sums and finite products of natural numbers, and in ). Induction: at both sides are , and .
Remarks
-
, and the empty product are one convention, not three. The value here is the base clause of the recursion above; by clause (e) it is the empty product of Finite sums and finite products of natural numbers, and in ; and Integer powers adopts for every real , included, so clause (d) is consistent at . The reasons for the convention are set out in Integer powers and are not repeated here.
-
The laws are the same laws. Clause (c) is the -valued form of clause 1 of Laws of integer exponents, which states , and for a base in a field. Only the two identities actually used on this page are proved above; the third is available in through clause (d) whenever it is wanted.
-
The exponent stays a natural number. Following the convention of Finite sums and finite products, by recursion, the identification of a natural with its canonical natural is deliberately not made in an exponent: in and in the exponent is a natural number, never a real.
Depends on
- The recursion theorem
- The principle of mathematical induction
- Addition of natural numbers
- Multiplication of natural numbers
- Multiplication is associative
- Multiplication is commutative
- Zero and one under multiplication
- Finite sums and finite products of natural numbers, $\sum_{k<n} a_k$ and $\prod_{k<n} a_k$ in $\mathbb{N}$
- Laws of finite sums and products in $\mathbb{N}$, and $\iota\big(\sum_{k<n} a_k\big) = \sum_{k<n} \iota(a_k)$
- Integer powers $a^m$
- The canonical natural $\iota(n) = n \cdot 1_F$ of a field
Used by
- ∑_k<n+1binomnk = 2ⁿ, and ∑_k<n+1(-1)ᵏιbinomnk = 0 for n ≥ 1 Corollary
- lvertP(A)| = 2^| A| for finite A Corollary
- A count that overcounts because the blocks are not disjoint, and exactly where the sum rule's hypothesis is spent Counterexample
- A finite p-group has order pⁿ for a prime p and some n∈ℕ Definition
- The dyadic rationals of [0,1], their finite levels Dₙ, and their density in [0,1] Definition
- All 8 functions 3 → 2, the 0 injections 3 → 2, and the 8 subsets of a 3-element set Example
- Pascal's triangle computed to row 6, with Pascal's rule checked at every interior entry Example
- The surjections from a five-element set onto a three-element set counted by the sieve formula and by direct subtraction Example
- FALSE: for all sets A and B with B having at least two elements, A × B is strictly larger than A False statement
- Conventions fixed on this page, and what counting is deliberately not done here Remark
- The conventions this page fixes: the empty intersection, where the counts live, the first index of every sum, and what the declared prerequisites do not supply Remark
- Any two finite free bases of the same group have the same cardinality Theorem
- Cauchy's theorem: if a prime p divides |G|, then G has an element of order p Theorem
- Cayley's formula: τ(Kₙ)=nⁿ⁻² for n≥2, with τ(K₁)=1 and τ(K₀)=0 Theorem
- Erdős-Rado sunflower lemma: more than k!(r-1)ᵏ distinct k-sets contain an r-petal sunflower Theorem
- Erdős's finite counting bound R(k,k)>2^k/2 for every k≥3 Theorem
- Every natural number and ω are cardinals, every infinite cardinal is a limit ordinal, and on the natural numbers the cardinal operations are the published finite counting operations, with | A | in the finite sense equal to | A | in the cardinal sense Theorem
- The number of surjections from an n-element set onto a k-element set is ∑_i<k+1(-1)ⁱbinomki(k-i)ⁿ, read in ℝ through ι Theorem
- The set A^B of functions B → A between finite sets is finite, with | A^B| = | A|^| B| Theorem
- Truncating the sieve at an odd depth over-estimates the size of the union and truncating it at an even depth under-estimates it Theorem
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 60 results over 17 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Exponentiation (Wikipedia) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Empty product (Wikipedia) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Recursive definition (Wikipedia) (standard reference, not scraped)