Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passaudited 2026-07-31
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced — the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted — a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated — a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Erdős-Rado sunflower lemma: more than k!(r1)kk!(r-1)^k distinct kk-sets contain an rr-petal sunflower

Statement

Let k0k\ge0 and r2r\ge2. Every finite family F\mathcal F of distinct kk-element sets satisfying

F>k!(r1)k|\mathcal F|>k!(r-1)^k

contains an rr-petal sunflower.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Natural numbers k0k\ge0 and r2r\ge2, and a finite family F\mathcal F of distinct kk-sets with F>k!(r1)k|\mathcal F|>k!(r-1)^k.

[L1]

For k1k\ge1, a maximal disjoint subfamily either contains rr members, forming an empty-core sunflower, or its union is a transversal of size at most k(r1)k(r-1) (A maximal pairwise disjoint subfamily either supplies a sunflower or gives a small transversal for the whole uniform family).

[F1]

A sunflower is a family of distinct sets with one common pairwise intersection (Sunflowers, petals, and their common core).

[L3]

0!=10!=1 and k!=k(k1)!k!=k(k-1)! for k1k\ge1 (The factorial n!n! and the falling factorial nkn^{\underline{k}}, defined by recursion in N\mathbb{N}). Natural powers satisfy m0=1m^0=1 and mσ(q)=mqmm^{\sigma(q)}=m^q m (Exponentiation of natural numbers, mnm^{n}, and its agreement with the integer power in R\mathbb{R}); induction on N\mathbb N is valid (The principle of mathematical induction).

Proof

technique · induction
1.1

For k=0k=0, there is only one 00-element set, so no family of distinct 00-sets satisfies F>0!(r1)0=1|\mathcal F|>0!(r-1)^0=1. The implication is therefore true.

baseL3
1.2

Assume the assertion for (k1)(k-1)-element sets, where k1k\ge1, and let F\mathcal F satisfy the displayed bound for kk.

ihL3
2.1

Choose a maximal pairwise disjoint subfamily G\mathcal G. If Gr|\mathcal G|\ge r, [L1] already supplies the required sunflower. Otherwise X=GX=\bigcup\mathcal G meets every member of F\mathcal F and Xk(r1)|X|\le k(r-1).

step 1.2L1choose
3.1

In the second case, let R={(F,x):FF, xFX}\mathcal R=\{(F,x):F\in\mathcal F,\ x\in F\cap X\} and project R\mathcal R to XX. Every FFF\in\mathcal F contributes at least one incidence, so RF|\mathcal R|\ge|\mathcal F|. Set q=(k1)!(r1)k1q=(k-1)!(r-1)^{k-1}. Since F>k!(r1)k=k(r1)q|\mathcal F|>k!(r-1)^k=k(r-1)q and Xk(r1)|X|\le k(r-1), we have R>qX|\mathcal R|>q|X|. By [L2], some xXx\in X belongs to more than qq members of F\mathcal F.

step 2.1L2L3
4.1

Remove xx from those members. The resulting sets are distinct (k1)(k-1)-sets, so the induction hypothesis gives rr of them forming a sunflower with core CC. Restoring xx gives rr original members whose pairwise intersections are all C{x}C\cup\{x\}.

step 3.1ihF1
5.1

The first case in step 2.1 and the construction in step 4.1 cover all possibilities, so F\mathcal F contains an rr-petal sunflower.

step 2.1step 4.1discharge-induction

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · next 3 levels

Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 71 results over 20 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.

Sources