Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passaudited 2026-08-11
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

For positive k,c,rk,c,r there is an NN such that every cc-colouring of [N]k[N]^k has a monochromatic rr-element set

Statement

For all positive natural numbers k,c,rk,c,r, some natural number NN satisfies

N(r)ck.N\to(r)^k_c.

Equivalently, every cc-colouring of [N]k[N]^k has a monochromatic rr-element set in the sense of Finite colourings of kk-element subsets, monochromatic sets, and the arrow notations N(s,t)2N\to(s,t)^2 and N(r)ckN\to(r)^k_c. Finite cardinalities and the induction are those of The cardinality A\lvert A\rvert of a finite set and The principle of mathematical induction.

Facts & Assumptions

Proof

technique · induction
1.1

If r=1r=1 or c=1c=1, any sufficiently large finite set works. For k=1k=1, N=c(r1)+1N=c(r-1)+1 works by finite pigeonhole. For k=2k=2, repeatedly group one colour against all remaining colours and apply [L1]; induction on cc gives a finite multicolour graph witness for every target rr.

baseL1
1.2

Assume k3k\ge3 and that the theorem is known for (k1)(k-1)-subsets with every finite colour and target parameter. Put M=c(r1)+1M=c(r-1)+1. Choose finite reservoir sizes backwards by qM=1q_M=1 and, for i<Mi<M, let qiq_i be one more than a (k1)(k-1)-uniform Ramsey witness for target qi+1q_{i+1} and cc colours, which exists by the induction hypothesis.

ih
2.1

Starting with a q0q_0-element set, choose its least vertex x0x_0. Colour each (k1)(k-1)-subset AA of the remaining reservoir by the colour of A{x0}A\cup\{x_0\}, and restrict to a homogeneous q1q_1-element reservoir. Repeat. After MM stages there are vertices x0,,xM1x_0,\ldots,x_{M-1} and colours d0,,dM1d_0,\ldots,d_{M-1} such that every kk-set of chosen vertices whose least member is xix_i has colour did_i.

step 1.2L2construct
3.1

Finite pigeonhole gives indices i1<<iri_1<\cdots<i_r for which di1==dird_{i_1}=\cdots=d_{i_r}. Every kk-subset of {xi1,,xir}\{x_{i_1},\ldots,x_{i_r}\} has least element xijx_{i_j} for some jj, hence has this common colour by step 2.1. This is a monochromatic rr-set.

step 2.1
4.1

The bases and the step from (k1)(k-1) to kk prove the assertion for every positive k,c,rk,c,r.

step 1.1step 3.1discharge-induction

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · next 3 levels

Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 70 results over 24 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.

Sources