How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Every finite colouring of has an infinite colour class, in ZF
Statement
Every colouring of (The natural numbers (von Neumann)) by a nonempty finite set of colours has an infinite colour class in the sense of Finite, countably infinite, countable, uncountable. The finite notions are those of The cardinality of a finite set, and the result is stronger than any fixed finite pigeonhole conclusion from If then every has a fibre with more than elements, and for nonempty some fibre has at least elements.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A function with nonempty and finite.
A finite disjoint union is finite with (The sum rule: a finite disjoint union is finite with and , and a sum over a finite index set splits along a partition).
A subset of is finite if it is bounded and countably infinite if it is unbounded (Every subset of an at most countable set is at most countable).
Proof
Suppose every fibre , for , is finite. These fibres are pairwise disjoint and their union is .
Iterating [L1] over the finite set makes their union finite. This contradicts the infinitude of , so at least one fibre is not finite. That fibre is a subset of , and [L2] therefore makes it countably infinite.
Depends on
- Finite, countably infinite, countable, uncountable
- Every subset of an at most countable set is at most countable
- If $\lvert A\rvert > k\lvert B\rvert$ then every $f : A \to B$ has a fibre with more than $k$ elements, and for nonempty $B$ some fibre has at least $\lceil \lvert A\rvert / \lvert B\rvert\rceil$ elements
- The sum rule: a finite disjoint union is finite with $\lvert A \cup B\rvert = \lvert A\rvert + \lvert B\rvert$ and $\lvert\bigcup_{i \in I} A_i\rvert = \sum_{i \in I}\lvert A_i\rvert$, and a sum over a finite index set splits along a partition
- The cardinality $\lvert A\rvert$ of a finite set
- The natural numbers $\mathbb{N}$ (von Neumann)
Used by
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 67 results over 22 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- I. B. Leader, Ramsey Theory, proof of Theorem 1 (standard reference, not scraped)