Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passaudited 2026-08-11
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Finite colour focussing extends equally coloured progressions to a longer monochromatic arithmetic progression

Statement

Fix positive m,km,k with m2m\ge2, and suppose that for every positive qq there is a finite witness V(m1,q)V(m-1,q) forcing a monochromatic (m1)(m-1)-term arithmetic progression under every qq-colouring. For each 1rk1\le r\le k there is a finite F(m,k,r)F(m,k,r) such that every kk-colouring of {1,,F(m,k,r)}\{1,\ldots,F(m,k,r)\} has either a monochromatic mm-term arithmetic progression, or rr monochromatic (m1)(m-1)-term arithmetic progressions of pairwise distinct colours focused at one integer ff: if Ai={ai+jdi:0j<m1}A_i=\{a_i+j d_i:0\le j<m-1\}, then ai+(m1)di=fa_i+(m-1)d_i=f for every ii.

All differences are positive. The finite product and function-counting used to compare block colour vectors are The product rule: A×B=AB\lvert A \times B\rvert = \lvert A\rvert\,\lvert B\rvert, and i<mAi=i<mAi\big\lvert\prod_{i<m} A_i\big\rvert = \prod_{i<m}\lvert A_i\rvert and The set ABA^{B} of functions BAB \to A between finite sets is finite, with AB=AB\lvert A^{B}\rvert = \lvert A\rvert^{\lvert B\rvert}; induction and order use The principle of mathematical induction, Order on the natural numbers and The cardinality A\lvert A\rvert of a finite set.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The parameters and the family of witnesses V(m1,q)V(m-1,q) in the Statement.

[L1]

If AA and BB are finite, then ABA^{B} is finite and AB=AB\lvert A^{B}\rvert = \lvert A\rvert^{\lvert B\rvert} (The set ABA^{B} of functions BAB \to A between finite sets is finite, with AB=AB\lvert A^{B}\rvert = \lvert A\rvert^{\lvert B\rvert}).

Proof

technique · induction
1.1

For r=1r=1 and m=2m=2, the singleton progression {1}\{1\} with chosen difference 11 is focused at 22. For m3m\ge3, apply V(m1,k)V(m-1,k) inside the first half of an interval twice as long. Its monochromatic (m1)(m-1)-term progression has positive difference at most the length of that half, so its next term still lies in the full interval. In either case there is one focused progression.

base
1.2

Assume r>1r>1. Take m=2m=2 first, where the block construction below has nothing to work with: a 11-term progression of block indices carries no difference. It is not needed. Among any k+1k+1 points two share a colour, and two points a<ba<b of one colour are a monochromatic 22-term progression with difference ba>0b-a>0, so F(2,k,r)=k+1F(2,k,r)=k+1 and the first alternative always holds. Assume from here that m3m\ge3, and let n=F(m,k,r1)n=F(m,k,r-1). Partition a sufficiently long interval into consecutive blocks of length 2n2n. By [L1] there are k2nk^{2n} possible block colour vectors. Use V(m1,k2n)V(m-1,k^{2n}) on the sequence of block vectors to obtain identically coloured blocks whose indices are b,b+t,,b+(m2)tb,b+t,\ldots,b+(m-2)t.

ihL1
2.1

Apply the induction hypothesis to the first half of the first selected block, an interval of length n=F(m,k,r1)n=F(m,k,r-1). It gives either a monochromatic mm-term progression, which finishes, or r1r-1 colour-focused progressions Ai={ai+jdi:0j<m1}A_i=\{a_i+j d_i:0\le j<m-1\} of pairwise distinct colours focused at ff. Each AiA_i lies in that first half, so ai+(m2)dina_i+(m-2)d_i\le n measured from the block start, and m3m\ge3 makes both aia_i and did_i at most nn; hence f=ai+(m1)di2nf=a_i+(m-1)d_i\le2n and the focus lies in the block. That is what the block length 2n2n is for, exactly as in step 1.1. For the second alternative define Ai={ai+j(di+2nt):0j<m1}A_i'=\{a_i+j(d_i+2nt):0\le j<m-1\}. Its jjth term occupies the same relative position in block b+jtb+jt as the jjth term of AiA_i in block bb, so identical block vectors preserve its colour.

step 1.2ih
3.1

The progressions AiA_i' are focused at f+(m1)2ntf+(m-1)2nt. Since ff lies in block bb by step 2.1, the point f+j2ntf+j\,2nt occupies the same relative position in block b+jtb+jt as ff does in block bb, so identical block vectors make f,f+2nt,,f+(m2)2ntf,f+2nt,\ldots,f+(m-2)2nt a monochromatic (m1)(m-1)-term progression, focused at the same point and coloured as ff is. If that colour equals the colour of some AiA_i, then Ai{f}={ai+jdi:0jm1}A_i\cup\{f\}=\{a_i+jd_i:0\le j\le m-1\} is a monochromatic mm-term progression and the first alternative holds. Otherwise the new progression differs in colour from all r1r-1 of the AiA_i', which already have pairwise distinct colours, and the second alternative contains rr focused progressions of distinct colours.

step 2.1
4.1

The base and step prove the focusing assertion for every 1rk1\le r\le k.

step 1.1step 3.1discharge-induction

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · next 3 levels

Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 54 results over 22 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.

Sources