Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-11
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Finite colour focussing extends equally coloured progressions to a longer monochromatic arithmetic progression

Statement

Fix positive m,k with m≥2, and suppose that for every positive q there is a finite witness V(m−1,q) forcing a monochromatic (m−1)-term arithmetic progression under every q-colouring. For each 1≤r≤k there is a finite F(m,k,r) such that every k-colouring of {1,…,F(m,k,r)} has either a monochromatic m-term arithmetic progression, or r monochromatic (m−1)-term arithmetic progressions of pairwise distinct colours focused at one integer f: if Ai={ai+jdi:0≤j<m−1}, then ai+(m−1)di=f for every i.

All differences are positive. The finite product and function-counting used to compare block colour vectors are The product rule: ∣A×B∣=∣A∣ ∣B∣, and ∣∏i<mAi∣=∏i<m∣Ai∣ and The set AB of functions B→A between finite sets is finite, with ∣AB∣=∣A∣∣B∣; induction and order use The principle of mathematical induction, Order on the natural numbers and The cardinality ∣A∣ of a finite set.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The parameters and the family of witnesses V(m−1,q) in the Statement.

[L1]

If A and B are finite, then AB is finite and ∣AB∣=∣A∣∣B∣ (The set AB of functions B→A between finite sets is finite, with ∣AB∣=∣A∣∣B∣).

Proof

technique · induction
1.1

For r=1 and m=2, the singleton progression {1} with chosen difference 1 is focused at 2. For m≥3, apply V(m−1,k) inside the first half of an interval twice as long. Its monochromatic (m−1)-term progression has positive difference at most the length of that half, so its next term still lies in the full interval. In either case there is one focused progression.

base
1.2

Assume r>1. Take m=2 first, where the block construction below has nothing to work with: a 1-term progression of block indices carries no difference. It is not needed. Among any k+1 points two share a colour, and two points a<b of one colour are a monochromatic 2-term progression with difference b−a>0, so F(2,k,r)=k+1 and the first alternative always holds. Assume from here that m≥3, and let n=F(m,k,r−1). Partition a sufficiently long interval into consecutive blocks of length 2n. By [L1] there are k2n possible block colour vectors. Use V(m−1,k2n) on the sequence of block vectors to obtain identically coloured blocks whose indices are b,b+t,…,b+(m−2)t.

ihL1
2.1

Apply the induction hypothesis to the first half of the first selected block, an interval of length n=F(m,k,r−1). It gives either a monochromatic m-term progression, which finishes, or r−1 colour-focused progressions Ai={ai+jdi:0≤j<m−1} of pairwise distinct colours focused at f. Each Ai lies in that first half, so ai+(m−2)di≤n measured from the block start, and m≥3 makes both ai and di at most n; hence f=ai+(m−1)di≤2n and the focus lies in the block. That is what the block length 2n is for, exactly as in step 1.1. For the second alternative define Ai′={ai+j(di+2nt):0≤j<m−1}. Its jth term occupies the same relative position in block b+jt as the jth term of Ai in block b, so identical block vectors preserve its colour.

step 1.2ih
3.1

The progressions Ai′ are focused at f+(m−1)2nt. Since f lies in block b by step 2.1, the point f+j 2nt occupies the same relative position in block b+jt as f does in block b, so identical block vectors make f,f+2nt,…,f+(m−2)2nt a monochromatic (m−1)-term progression, focused at the same point and coloured as f is. If that colour equals the colour of some Ai, then Ai∪{f}={ai+jdi:0≤j≤m−1} is a monochromatic m-term progression and the first alternative holds. Otherwise the new progression differs in colour from all r−1 of the Ai′, which already have pairwise distinct colours, and the second alternative contains r focused progressions of distinct colours.

step 2.1
4.1

The base and step prove the focusing assertion for every 1≤r≤k.

step 1.1step 3.1discharge-induction∎

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

22 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources