How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Finite colour focussing extends equally coloured progressions to a longer monochromatic arithmetic progression
Statement
Fix positive with , and suppose that for every positive there is a finite witness forcing a monochromatic -term arithmetic progression under every -colouring. For each there is a finite such that every -colouring of has either a monochromatic -term arithmetic progression, or monochromatic -term arithmetic progressions of pairwise distinct colours focused at one integer : if , then for every .
All differences are positive. The finite product and function-counting used to compare block colour vectors are The product rule: , and and The set of functions between finite sets is finite, with ; induction and order use The principle of mathematical induction, Order on the natural numbers and The cardinality of a finite set.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The parameters and the family of witnesses in the Statement.
If and are finite, then is finite and (The set of functions between finite sets is finite, with ).
Proof
For and , the singleton progression with chosen difference is focused at . For , apply inside the first half of an interval twice as long. Its monochromatic -term progression has positive difference at most the length of that half, so its next term still lies in the full interval. In either case there is one focused progression.
Assume . Take first, where the block construction below has nothing to work with: a -term progression of block indices carries no difference. It is not needed. Among any points two share a colour, and two points of one colour are a monochromatic -term progression with difference , so and the first alternative always holds. Assume from here that , and let . Partition a sufficiently long interval into consecutive blocks of length . By [L1] there are possible block colour vectors. Use on the sequence of block vectors to obtain identically coloured blocks whose indices are .
Apply the induction hypothesis to the first half of the first selected block, an interval of length . It gives either a monochromatic -term progression, which finishes, or colour-focused progressions of pairwise distinct colours focused at . Each lies in that first half, so measured from the block start, and makes both and at most ; hence and the focus lies in the block. That is what the block length is for, exactly as in step 1.1. For the second alternative define . Its th term occupies the same relative position in block as the th term of in block , so identical block vectors preserve its colour.
The progressions are focused at . Since lies in block by step 2.1, the point occupies the same relative position in block as does in block , so identical block vectors make a monochromatic -term progression, focused at the same point and coloured as is. If that colour equals the colour of some , then is a monochromatic -term progression and the first alternative holds. Otherwise the new progression differs in colour from all of the , which already have pairwise distinct colours, and the second alternative contains focused progressions of distinct colours.
The base and step prove the focusing assertion for every .
Depends on
- The product rule: $\lvert A \times B\rvert = \lvert A\rvert\,\lvert B\rvert$, and $\big\lvert\prod_{i<m} A_i\big\rvert = \prod_{i<m}\lvert A_i\rvert$
- The set $A^{B}$ of functions $B \to A$ between finite sets is finite, with $\lvert A^{B}\rvert = \lvert A\rvert^{\lvert B\rvert}$
- The principle of mathematical induction
- The cardinality $\lvert A\rvert$ of a finite set
- Order on the natural numbers
Used by
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 54 results over 22 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- I. B. Leader, Ramsey Theory, Section 1.2, colour-focussing proof (standard reference, not scraped)