How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A two-block pure blockade can realize equality in the additive kappa theorem
Example
Equality can occur in the additive theorem for a two-block pure blockade.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The complete graph on vertices , with blocks and .
The pattern graph of a pure blockade records an edge exactly when the two corresponding blocks are complete (The pattern graph of a pure blockade).
A clique on vertices has , , and therefore (Cliques, stable sets, the clique number and stability number , The parameter kappa(G)=alpha(G)omega(G)).
The additive theorem states that a pure blockade with cograph pattern satisfies (A pure blockade with a cograph pattern has additive kappa).
Verification
The blockade is pure, and the two blocks are complete to each other because the ambient graph is . Hence its pattern graph is , which is a cograph.
The induced subgraphs on , on , and on are respectively , , and . By [L2], So
Thus this two-block pure blockade attains equality in the inequality from [L3].
Depends on
- A pure blockade with a cograph pattern has additive kappa
- The pattern graph of a pure blockade
- Empty and complete graphs, complete bipartite graphs, and the convention that $P_n$ and $C_n$ have $n$ vertices
- The parameter kappa(G)=alpha(G)omega(G)
- Cliques, stable sets, the clique number $\omega(G)$ and stability number $\alpha(G)$
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
21 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Maria Chudnovsky, Alex Scott, Paul Seymour, and Sophie Spirkl, Erdos-Hajnal for graphs with no 5-hole, Theorem 5.1 (standard reference, not scraped)