How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The sieve run in full on three explicit finite sets and then on four, with every nonempty intersection listed
Example
Take the ambient set and the subsets
First the family , a sieve family with ambient set and index set (A finite family of subsets of a finite set , the intersections for , and the convention ). Every intersection for is listed:
The union is , of size , and the sieve returns . The complementary form returns , and indeed .
Now the family , with adjoined and :
The union is now all of , of size , and the sieve returns . The complementary form returns , and indeed .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The ambient set and the subsets above, together with the two index sets and and the canonical natural (The canonical natural of a field).
A listed set with distinct entries has as many elements as entries: if are distinct then is a bijection of onto , so that set is finite of cardinality (The cardinality of a finite set, clauses (a) and (c), Injection, surjection, bijection).
For a sieve family with ambient set , finite index set , union and , the sieve identity and its complementary form are (Inclusion and exclusion: , together with the complementary form counting the elements in none of the , A finite family of subsets of a finite set , the intersections for , and the convention ).
Every is finite with a unique natural cardinality , while ; hence the levels for are pairwise disjoint and have union . The sign attached to is , positive for odd and negative for even (The cardinality of a finite set, A subset of a finite set is finite, with , and equality holds if and only if , The set of -element subsets and the binomial coefficient , The sum rule: a finite disjoint union is finite with and , and a sum over a finite index set splits along a partition, clause 3, The sum over a finite index set, and its product form, Integer powers ).
is additive and injective, so the arithmetic of the displayed sums may be carried out on the natural numbers and read in (Laws of finite sums and products in , and , clauses 0 and 7, Ordered field).
Verification
The three-set family. , , are subsets of with , and by [L1], each entry list being strictly increasing and so having distinct entries.
Its intersections. Intersecting the listed sets entry by entry gives , , and , of sizes , , and by [L1].
Its union and complement. An element of lies in unless it is , since , and while belongs to none of the three listed sets; so the union is , of size , and its complement in is , of size .
The four-set family. Adjoining , of size , the remaining intersections are , , , and , of sizes , , , , , and by [L1] and clause (b) of The cardinality of a finite set.
The four-set union. Now , so the union is all of , of size , and its complement in is empty, of size .
The sieve for three sets. Grouping by size as in [L3], clause 1 of [L2] reads , which matches step 1.3.
The complementary form for three sets. Clause 2 of [L2] adds the term at , which is , and reverses every sign, giving , which matches the complement computed in step 1.3.
The sieve for four sets. The singleton terms now sum to , the pair terms to , the triple terms to and the single four-element term is ; so clause 1 of [L2] reads , which matches step 1.5, and clause 2 reads , again matching.
Both families therefore satisfy both forms of the identity, with every intersection exhibited rather than inferred.
Remarks
-
Adjoining one set changes every level of the sum. Passing from three sets to four adds a singleton term, three pair terms, three triple terms and one four-element term, and the totals at each level move accordingly; what stays fixed is that the alternating combination reproduces the size of the union.
-
The terms that vanish are not omitted. and the three four-element-family triples are empty, so their terms are ; they are still terms of the sum, and writing them keeps the count of terms at each level equal to the number of subsets of that size, which is what the grouping in [L3] asserts.
-
Where the complementary form gets its extra term. It runs over all subsets of the index set, including , whose term is . That is the only place the ambient set enters the arithmetic, and it is why the ambient set has to be named as part of the family.
Depends on
- Inclusion and exclusion: $\iota\lvert\bigcup_{i \in I} A_i\rvert = \sum_{\varnothing \ne J \subseteq I}(-1)^{\lvert J\rvert + 1}\,\iota\lvert A_J\rvert$, together with the complementary form counting the elements in none of the $A_i$
- A finite family $(A_i)_{i \in I}$ of subsets of a finite set $X$, the intersections $A_J$ for $J \subseteq I$, and the convention $A_\varnothing = X$
- The cardinality $\lvert A\rvert$ of a finite set
- The sum $\sum_{i \in S} a_i$ over a finite index set, and its product form
- The canonical natural $\iota(n) = n \cdot 1_F$ of a field
- Integer powers $a^m$
- The set $[A]^{k}$ of $k$-element subsets and the binomial coefficient $\binom{n}{k} := \lvert [n]^{k}\rvert$
- The sum rule: a finite disjoint union is finite with $\lvert A \cup B\rvert = \lvert A\rvert + \lvert B\rvert$ and $\lvert\bigcup_{i \in I} A_i\rvert = \sum_{i \in I}\lvert A_i\rvert$, and a sum over a finite index set splits along a partition
- Injection, surjection, bijection
- A subset of a finite set is finite, with $\lvert B\rvert \le \lvert A\rvert$, and equality holds if and only if $B = A$
- Laws of finite sums and products in $\mathbb{N}$, and $\iota\big(\sum_{k<n} a_k\big) = \sum_{k<n} \iota(a_k)$
- Ordered field
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 85 results over 28 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Inclusion-exclusion principle (Wikipedia) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Cardinality (Wikipedia) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Guichard, The Inclusion-Exclusion Formula (LibreTexts) (standard reference, not scraped)