Alphabeta Math
DefinitionDefinition: AI-adaptedProof: Not applicableSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)judge pass (z-ai/glm-5.2)verified 2026-07-29 (claude-fable-5)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced — the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted — a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated — a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A relation RX×YR \subseteq X \times Y between finite sets, its row fibres RxR_x and its column fibres RyR^y

Definition

Let XX and YY be finite sets (Finite, countably infinite, countable, uncountable, The cardinality A\lvert A\rvert of a finite set) and let RX×YR \subseteq X \times Y be a relation between them. For xXx \in X and yYy \in Y set

Rx:={yY : (x,y)R},Ry:={xX : (x,y)R},R_x := \{\, y \in Y \ :\ (x,y) \in R \,\}, \qquad R^{y} := \{\, x \in X \ :\ (x,y) \in R \,\},

the row fibre of RR at xx and the column fibre of RR at yy.

XYx1x2x3y1y2y3Sample:Rx2=fy2;y3gandRy2=fx1;x2g.

(a) Everything here is finite. X×YX \times Y is finite (The product rule: A×B=AB\lvert A \times B\rvert = \lvert A\rvert\,\lvert B\rvert, and i<mAi=i<mAi\big\lvert\prod_{i<m} A_i\big\rvert = \prod_{i<m}\lvert A_i\rvert, clause 1), so RR is finite as a subset of it, and RxYR_x \subseteq Y and RyXR^{y} \subseteq X are finite as subsets of finite sets (A subset of a finite set is finite, with BA\lvert B\rvert \le \lvert A\rvert, and equality holds if and only if B=AB = A, clause 1). Hence R\lvert R\rvert, Rx\lvert R_x\rvert and Ry\lvert R^{y}\rvert are all defined, and each is a natural number (The cardinality A\lvert A\rvert of a finite set).

(b) The fibres are the slices of RR, up to a bijection. For xXx \in X,

R({x}×Y)  =  {x}×Rx,R \cap (\{x\} \times Y) \;=\; \{x\} \times R_x ,

since (u,v)(u,v) lies in the left-hand side exactly when u=xu = x, vYv \in Y and (x,v)R(x,v) \in R, that is exactly when u=xu = x and vRxv \in R_x. The map y(x,y)y \mapsto (x,y) is a bijection of RxR_x onto {x}×Rx\{x\} \times R_x, its two-sided inverse being the second-coordinate map (Injection, surjection, bijection), so {x}×Rx=Rx\lvert\{x\} \times R_x\rvert = \lvert R_x\rvert by the transport clause (c) of The cardinality A\lvert A\rvert of a finite set. Symmetrically R(X×{y})=Ry×{y}R \cap (X \times \{y\}) = R^{y} \times \{y\} and Ry×{y}=Ry\lvert R^{y} \times \{y\}\rvert = \lvert R^{y}\rvert.

(c) The slices partition RR. The sets {x}×Rx\{x\} \times R_x, for xXx \in X, are pairwise disjoint, because a point of {x}×Rx\{x\} \times R_x has first coordinate xx; and their union is RR, because every (u,v)R(u,v) \in R has uXu \in X and vRuv \in R_u. Symmetrically the sets Ry×{y}R^{y} \times \{y\}, for yYy \in Y, are pairwise disjoint with union RR.

(d) Neighbours. When X=YX = Y and RR is symmetric ((x,y)R(x,y) \in R implies (y,x)R(y,x) \in R) and irreflexive ((x,x)R(x,x) \notin R for every xx), Rx=RxR_x = R^{x} and this common set is called the set of neighbours of xx; it is a subset of X{x}X \setminus \{x\}.

Remarks

  • A relation, not a matrix. The object counted here is a subset of a product of two finite sets. Nothing about arrays, entries or indices by position is used, and the two fibre families are the only structure the counting arguments need.

  • No graph vocabulary. Clause (d) fixes the words symmetric, irreflexive and neighbour for a relation on a single finite set. Nothing among this page's declared prerequisites defines a graph, and none of the results stated with clause (d) needs one.

  • Both fibre families are indexed by a finite set, which is what lets the cardinalities be summed at all: a sum over a finite index set is defined only when the index set is finite (The sum iSai\sum_{i \in S} a_i over a finite index set, and its product form).

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · next 3 levels

Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 54 results over 22 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.

Sources