Alphabeta Math
CorollaryStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-07-31
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Both forms of Möbius inversion hold on every finite poset

Statement

If the ground set of a poset P is finite, then P is both lower-finite and upper-finite. Consequently both forms of Möbius inversion on a lower-finite poset, with the dual upper-finite form hold for functions from P into any commutative ring.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A poset P with finite ground set.

[L2]

Lower-finite and upper-finite Möbius inversion hold under their respective hypotheses (Möbius inversion on a lower-finite poset, with the dual upper-finite form).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

For each y∈P, the principal ideal P≤y is a subset of P, hence finite by [L1]; thus P is lower-finite.

L1
1.2

For each x∈P, the principal filter P≥x is a subset of P, hence finite by [L1]; thus P is upper-finite.

L1
2.1

Applying the two separate parts of [L2] proves both inversion formulas on P.

step 1.1step 1.2L2∎

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

20 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources