How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The complementary inclusion-exclusion formula is Möbius inversion on the Boolean lattice
Statement
For a finite sieve family in a finite ambient set , let be the canonical natural map used in Inclusion and exclusion: , together with the complementary form counting the elements in none of the . The complementary inclusion-exclusion identity
in is exactly the upper-finite Möbius inversion formula on the Boolean lattice .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A sieve family , its intersections , and the trace (A finite family of subsets of a finite set , the intersections for , and the convention ).
For , exactly when , including ; and exactly when (A finite family of subsets of a finite set , the intersections for , and the convention ).
Both forms of Möbius inversion hold on the finite Boolean lattice (Both forms of Möbius inversion hold on every finite poset).
Its Möbius function is (For in a finite Boolean lattice, ).
The complementary inclusion-exclusion theorem uses the canonical map , has the displayed terms, and adopts the convention (Inclusion and exclusion: , together with the complementary form counting the elements in none of the ).
Proof
For , let , and let . The trace classes partition , and [F1] gives in .
Apply the upper-finite form of [L1] at : .
By [F1], , and by [L2], . Substitution in step 2.1 gives .
The identity in step 3.1 matches [L3] term for term, including the empty-subset term ; hence complementary inclusion-exclusion is Boolean-lattice Möbius inversion.
Depends on
- For $A\subseteq B$ in a finite Boolean lattice, $\mu(A,B)=(-1)^{\lvert B\setminus A\rvert}$
- Both forms of Möbius inversion hold on every finite poset
- A finite family $(A_i)_{i \in I}$ of subsets of a finite set $X$, the intersections $A_J$ for $J \subseteq I$, and the convention $A_\varnothing = X$
- Inclusion and exclusion: $\iota\lvert\bigcup_{i \in I} A_i\rvert = \sum_{\varnothing \ne J \subseteq I}(-1)^{\lvert J\rvert + 1}\,\iota\lvert A_J\rvert$, together with the complementary form counting the elements in none of the $A_i$
Used by
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 88 results over 20 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- R. Stanley, Enumerative Combinatorics, Volume 1, §§3.6–3.8 (standard reference, not scraped)