Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-07-31
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

On a finite chain, the Möbius function is 1 on the diagonal, −1 on covers and 0 on longer intervals

Statement

Let C be a finite totally ordered poset, and let x≤y in C. Then

μC(x,y)={1,x=y,−1,y covers x,0,there is z with x<z<y.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A finite chain C (Chain in a poset) and comparable elements x≤y.

[L1]

μ(x,x)=1 and μ(x,y)=−∑x≤z<yμ(x,z) for x<y (The Möbius recurrence: μP(x,x)=1 and both interval sums of μP vanish when x<y).

[L2]

Strong induction on finite interval cardinality (Strong (complete) induction, The cardinality ∣A∣ of a finite set).

Proof

technique · induction
1.1

The diagonal value is 1 by [L1].

baseL1
1.2

If y covers x, then the recurrence has only the term z=x, so μ(x,y)=−μ(x,x)=−1.

L1
1.3

Fix an interval cardinality and assume the formula holds on every strictly smaller interval.

ih
1.4

Suppose there is an element strictly between x and y. The finite nonempty chain (x,y] has a least element c: starting with any element, successively retain the smaller one while traversing a finite enumeration. Then c covers x and c<y.

givenconstruct
2.1

For every z with c<z<y, the interval [x,z] is a proper subset of [x,y] and contains the intermediate element c, so the inductive hypothesis and [L3] give μ(x,z)=0.

step 1.3step 1.4L3
3.1

The recurrence now gives μ(x,y)=−∑x≤z<yμ(x,z)=−(μ(x,x)+μ(x,c))=−(1−1)=0.

step 1.1step 1.2step 2.1L1
4.1

The diagonal and cover cases are steps 1.1 and 1.2; step 3.1 proves the longer-interval case from all smaller intervals, so strong induction completes the formula.

step 1.1step 1.2step 1.3step 3.1L2discharge-induction∎

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

24 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources