Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passaudited 2026-07-31
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

On a finite chain, the Möbius function is 11 on the diagonal, 1-1 on covers and 00 on longer intervals

Statement

Let CC be a finite totally ordered poset, and let xyx\le y in CC. Then

μC(x,y)={1,x=y,1,y covers x,0,there is z with x<z<y.\mu_C(x,y)=\begin{cases}1,&x=y,\\-1,&y\text{ covers }x,\\0,&\text{there is }z\text{ with }x<z<y.\end{cases}

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A finite chain CC (Chain in a poset) and comparable elements xyx\le y.

[L1]

μ(x,x)=1\mu(x,x)=1 and μ(x,y)=xz<yμ(x,z)\mu(x,y)=-\sum_{x\le z<y}\mu(x,z) for x<yx<y (The Möbius recurrence: μP(x,x)=1\mu_P(x,x)=1 and both interval sums of μP\mu_P vanish when x<yx<y).

Proof

technique · induction
1.1

The diagonal value is 11 by [L1].

baseL1
1.2

If yy covers xx, then the recurrence has only the term z=xz=x, so μ(x,y)=μ(x,x)=1\mu(x,y)=-\mu(x,x)=-1.

L1
1.3

Fix an interval cardinality and assume the formula holds on every strictly smaller interval.

ih
1.4

Suppose there is an element strictly between xx and yy. The finite nonempty chain (x,y](x,y] has a least element cc: starting with any element, successively retain the smaller one while traversing a finite enumeration. Then cc covers xx and c<yc<y.

givenconstruct
2.1

For every zz with c<z<yc<z<y, the interval [x,z][x,z] is a proper subset of [x,y][x,y] and contains the intermediate element cc, so the inductive hypothesis and [L3] give μ(x,z)=0\mu(x,z)=0.

step 1.3step 1.4L3
3.1

The recurrence now gives μ(x,y)=xz<yμ(x,z)=(μ(x,x)+μ(x,c))=(11)=0\mu(x,y)=-\sum_{x\le z<y}\mu(x,z)=-(\mu(x,x)+\mu(x,c))=-(1-1)=0.

step 1.1step 1.2step 2.1L1
4.1

The diagonal and cover cases are steps 1.1 and 1.2; step 3.1 proves the longer-interval case from all smaller intervals, so strong induction completes the formula.

step 1.1step 1.2step 1.3step 3.1L2discharge-induction

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · next 3 levels

Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 52 results over 23 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.

Sources