Alphabeta Math
CorollaryStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-13
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The central binomial coefficient is asymptotic to 4^n divided by the square root of pi n

Statement

For n≥1, put an:=(2nn)/4n. Then

πn an⟶1.

Equivalently,

(2nn)∼4nπn,

where the asymptotic notation means that the ratio of the two sides tends to 1.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A natural n≥1 and the positive real an=(2nn)/4n.

[L2]

For n∈N, Wn=∏k=1n(2k)2/((2k−1)(2k+1)), with W0=1, and Wn→π/2 (Wallis's product: pi over two is the limit of the finite Wallis products).

[L3]

A finite product in a monoid has empty product equal to the identity and satisfies the recursion that adjoins its last factor (The product g0g1⋯gn−1 of a finite list in a monoid, by recursion, with the empty product (n=0) equal to the identity).

[L4]

Products and quotients of convergent real sequences have the corresponding limits when the limiting denominator is nonzero (Algebra of limits: sums, scalar multiples, products and quotients).

[L6]

For every ε>0 there is a natural N≥1 with 1/N<ε (For every ε>0 in a complete ordered field there is a natural n≥1 with 1/n<ε).

[L7]

The constant π is positive (Pi as twice the smallest positive zero of cosine).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

By [L1] and [L3], an=(2n)!(n!)2 4n=∏k=1n2k−12k.

givenL1L3algebra
2.1

Comparing step 1.1 with the factors in Wn gives Wn=1(2n+1)an2.

step 1.1L2L3algebra
3.1

By [L2], [L4], and step 2.1, ((π/2)(2n+1)an2)→1. Also 2n/(2n+1)→1 by [L6], so πnan2=2n2n+1⋅π2(2n+1)an2⟶1.

step 2.1L2L4L6algebra
4.1

Let bn:=πn an≥0, which is defined by [L5] and [L7]. Then bn2=πnan2→1 by step 3.1, and ∣bn−1∣=∣bn2−1∣bn+1≤∣bn2−1∣, so bn→1.

step 3.1L5L7algebra
5.1

For every n≥1, the ratio of (2nn) to 4n/πn is exactly πn an. Thus either displayed asymptotic formulation implies the other, by the definition of asymptotic equivalence.

givenstep 4.1algebra
6.1

At n=0, a0=1 but the comparison term 4n/πn is undefined. The theorem starts at n=1, where every denominator in steps 1.1 to 5.1 is positive, and steps 4.1 and 5.1 prove its two equivalent formulations.

givenstep 1.1step 2.1step 3.1step 4.1step 5.1L1L7∎

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

61 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources