Alphabeta Math
False statementConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passjudge pass (z-ai/glm-5.2)verified 2026-07-26 (claude-opus-5)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

FALSE: am/n:=(a1/n)ma^{m/n} := (a^{1/n})^{m} extends to negative bases

Statement

False claim: the definition am/n:=(a1/n)ma^{m/n} := \big(a^{1/n}\big)^{m} of Rational powers ara^r of a positive base extends to negative bases, that is, the same formula assigns to every a<0a < 0 and every rQr \in \mathbb{Q} a real number ara^{r}, depending only on aa and on the rational rr.

This is the claim that Rational powers ara^r of a positive base rules out by insisting on a>0a > 0, and this item is the reason for that restriction.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The base a=8a = -8 and the rational r=1/3r = 1/3; the formula under test is am/n=(a1/n)ma^{m/n} = \big(a^{1/n}\big)^{m}, in which a1/na^{1/n} has to denote a real number whose nn-th power is aa (Rational powers ara^r of a positive base, Existence and uniqueness of nn-th roots: a unique a1/n0a^{1/n} \ge 0 with (a1/n)n=a(a^{1/n})^n = a).

[A1]

Numerals denote canonical naturals. For a natural kk the symbol kk inside R\mathbb{R} means ι(k)=k1R\iota(k) = k \cdot 1_{\mathbb{R}}, where ι\iota is the canonical order-preserving field embedding; ι(k)>0\iota(k) > 0 for k1k \ge 1, and ι\iota preserves products (Canonical naturals are positive and strictly increasing, The unique embedding of ℚ into an ordered field). So 8>08 > 0, and therefore 8<0-8 < 0, since x>0x > 0 means xPx \in P and 0(x)=xP0 - (-x) = x \in P says x<0-x < 0 (Ordered field; none of the items just named states this passage from a positive element to its negative). Also 23=ι(2)ι(2)ι(2)=ι(8)=82^{3} = \iota(2)\iota(2)\iota(2) = \iota(8) = 8 (Integer powers ama^m). This is where the numerals of this item enter R\mathbb{R}; the order on Q\mathbb{Q} (Order on the rationals) is not what is being used when we write 8<0-8 < 0 in R\mathbb{R}.

[A2]

The same rational has many representatives: 1/3=2/61/3 = 2/6 in Q\mathbb{Q}, since 16=321 \cdot 6 = 3 \cdot 2 (The rationals as equivalence classes of pairs of integers). For a formula in mm and nn to define a function of rr, all representatives must give the same value, which for positive bases is Rational powers do not depend on the representative.

[A3]

No real has sixth power 8-8: for every xRx \in \mathbb{R}, x6=(x3)2x^{6} = \big(x^{3}\big)^{2} (Laws of integer exponents, claim 1, Integer powers ama^m), and a square is nonnegative because a nonzero one is positive (Squares of nonzero elements are positive) while 02=00=00^{2} = 0 \cdot 0 = 0 (Multiplication by zero: 0a=00 \cdot a = 0); so x60x^{6} \ge 0, whereas 8<0-8 < 0 in R\mathbb{R} by [A1].

[A4]

Exactly one real has cube 8-8, namely 2-2: if x3=8<0x^{3} = -8 < 0 then x<0x < 0, since x0x \ge 0 would give x30x^{3} \ge 0; and then y:=x>0y := -x > 0 satisfies y3=x3=8y^{3} = -x^{3} = 8, so y=81/3=2y = 8^{1/3} = 2 by uniqueness of the nonnegative cube root, whence x=2x = -2 (Existence and uniqueness of nn-th roots: a unique a1/n0a^{1/n} \ge 0 with (a1/n)n=a(a^{1/n})^n = a, Monotonicity of xxnx \mapsto x^n and of nann \mapsto a^n, Sign rules for products and monotonicity of multiplication, Sign rules for products: (a)b=(ab)(-a)b = -(ab) and (a)(b)=ab(-a)(-b) = ab).

Refutation

technique · contradiction
1.1

Assume, for contradiction, that the formula does define ara^{r} for negative aa and every rational rr, depending only on aa and rr; then in particular (8)1/3(-8)^{1/3} is a real number, and the value obtained from any representative m/nm/n of the rational 1/31/3 is that same number.

assume-contragivenA2
2.1

Read through the representative 1/31/3: the formula gives (8)1/3=((8)1/3)1(-8)^{1/3} = \big((-8)^{1/3}\big)^{1}, where (8)1/3(-8)^{1/3} is a real cube root of 8-8, and there is exactly one such real, namely 2-2; so the value is 2-2.

step 1.1A1A4
2.2

Read through the representative 2/62/6: the formula gives (8)2/6=((8)1/6)2(-8)^{2/6} = \big((-8)^{1/6}\big)^{2}, and (8)1/6(-8)^{1/6} must be a real sixth root of 8-8, of which there is none.

step 1.1A1A3
3.1

The two readings are incompatible: by the assumption the rational 1/3=2/61/3 = 2/6 has a single value, which step 2.1 computes to be 2-2, while step 2.2 shows that the very expression the formula prescribes for the representative 2/62/6 names nothing at all in R\mathbb{R}.

step 1.1step 2.1step 2.2A2
4.1

The assumption therefore fails, and the failure is not an artefact of the chosen numbers: every rational rr has representatives with even denominator, and a negative base has no real root of even order by the argument of [A3], so for a negative base the formula depends on the representative and Rational powers do not depend on the representative genuinely breaks down; this is exactly why Rational powers ara^r of a positive base requires a>0a > 0.

step 3.1step 1.1A2A3discharge-contradiction

Remarks

  • Precisely what fails. For a negative base the formula does not produce two different numbers; it produces a number from some representatives and nothing at all from others. That is still a failure of well-definedness: a definition of ara^{r} must depend only on the rational rr, and this one depends on how rr is written.
  • The odd-denominator repair, and why it is not adopted. If one restricts to rationals admitting a representative m/nm/n with nn odd, and always uses such a representative, the formula is consistent, because odd roots of negatives exist and are unique (FALSE: every real number has a real square root records this). What one gets is a partial operation, defined on the proper subset of Q\mathbb{Q} of rationals with odd denominator in lowest terms, not on Q\mathbb{Q}. The library does not adopt it: it is not the operation of Rational powers ara^r of a positive base, its exponents form only a proper subring of Q\mathbb{Q} (every rational whose lowest-terms denominator is even is missing, 1/21/2 among them, so the square root that Square roots exist: a unique a0\sqrt{a} \ge 0 with (a)2=a(\sqrt{a})^2 = a; the positives are {x2:x0}\{x^2 : x \neq 0\} supplies for nonnegative bases has no counterpart here), and every later use on this page, from Weighted AM-GM inequality with rational weights to Minkowski's inequality for finite sums (rational exponent), needs arbitrary rational exponents on a base that is nonnegative anyway.
  • The restriction to a>0a > 0 is therefore not squeamishness about signs. It is the exact condition under which a1/na^{1/n} exists for every n1n \ge 1, which is what makes the value independent of the representative.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · next 3 levels

Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 73 results over 24 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.

Sources