How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Rational powers do not depend on the representative
Statement
Let with , and let and with satisfy in (The rationals as equivalence classes of pairs of integers). Then
Consequently the value of Rational powers of a positive base depends only on the rational and not on the representative chosen for it, so Rational powers of a positive base really does define a function on . The same conclusion holds in the supplementary case with (Order on the rationals), where every representative gives the value .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A real , integers , and naturals with in .
Roots (Existence and uniqueness of -th roots: a unique with ): is the unique with , and when ; likewise for .
Laws of integer exponents (Laws of integer exponents, Integer powers ): for and integers , and .
Injectivity of on the nonnegatives for (Monotonicity of and of ); and a positive element has positive integer powers, since gives for and (Monotonicity of and of , Inverses of positives are positive, and reciprocation reverses order).
Equality of rationals (The rationals as equivalence classes of pairs of integers): holds exactly when in .
Positivity of a rational and of its numerator (Order on the rationals, Order on the integers, The naturals embed in the integers): the order on is read off any representative with positive denominator, and on such a representative one has exactly when in ; a positive integer is the image of a unique natural , so then .
Proof
Put and ; since we have and , hence and .
The hypothesis says exactly that in , and .
Raising to the power and using the iterated-power law twice: .
The same computation for : .
Since , the two right-hand sides agree, so .
Both and are positive and , so injectivity of on the nonnegatives forces , which is the displayed identity; hence is independent of the representative, and in the supplementary case with every representative of with has in , hence , so for all of them.
Depends on
- Rational powers $a^r$ of a positive base
- Existence and uniqueness of $n$-th roots: a unique $a^{1/n} \ge 0$ with $(a^{1/n})^n = a$
- Monotonicity of $x \mapsto x^n$ and of $n \mapsto a^n$
- Laws of integer exponents
- The rationals as equivalence classes of pairs of integers
- Integer powers $a^m$
- Inverses of positives are positive, and reciprocation reverses order
- Order on the rationals
- Order on the integers
- The naturals embed in the integers
Used by
- The p-norms ‖ x‖ₚ for rational p ≥ 1, and ‖ x‖_∞ Definition
- FALSE: a^m/n := (a^1/n)ᵐ extends to negative bases False statement
- Laws of rational exponents Lemma
- Monotonicity of r ↦ aʳ and of a ↦ aʳ Lemma
Cited to discharge well-definedness by Rational powers aʳ of a positive base.
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 71 results over 23 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- J. Lebl, Basic Analysis I (standard reference, not scraped)
- Radicals and rational exponents (Emory University) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Exponentiation (Wikipedia) (standard reference, not scraped)
- W. Rudin, Principles of Mathematical Analysis, 3rd ed., Ch. 1 (standard reference, not scraped)
- T. Tao, Analysis I, 3rd ed., §5.6 (standard reference, not scraped)