Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (openai/gpt-5.4)verified 2026-07-26 (claude-opus-5)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Rational powers do not depend on the representative

Statement

Let a∈R with a>0, and let m,p∈Z and n,q∈N with n,q≥1 satisfy m/n=p/q in Q (The rationals as equivalence classes of pairs of integers). Then

(a1/n)m=(a1/q)p.

Consequently the value ar of Rational powers ar of a positive base depends only on the rational r and not on the representative m/n chosen for it, so Rational powers ar of a positive base really does define a function (a,r)↦ar on {a>0}×Q. The same conclusion holds in the supplementary case a=0 with r>0 (Order on the rationals), where every representative gives the value 0.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A real a>0, integers m,p, and naturals n,q≥1 with m/n=p/q in Q.

[L1]

Roots (Existence and uniqueness of n-th roots: a unique a1/n≥0 with (a1/n)n=a): a1/n is the unique s≥0 with sn=a, and s>0 when a>0; likewise for q.

[L2]

Laws of integer exponents (Laws of integer exponents, Integer powers am): for x≠0 and integers j,k, (xj)k=xjk and xj≠0.

[L3]

Injectivity of x↦xN on the nonnegatives for N≥1 (Monotonicity of x↦xn and of n↦an); and a positive element has positive integer powers, since x>0 gives xk>0 for k∈N and x−k=(xk)−1>0 (Monotonicity of x↦xn and of n↦an, Inverses of positives are positive, and reciprocation reverses order).

[L4]

Equality of rationals (The rationals as equivalence classes of pairs of integers): m/n=p/q holds exactly when mq=pn in Z.

[L5]

Positivity of a rational and of its numerator (Order on the rationals, Order on the integers, The naturals embed in the integers): the order on Q is read off any representative with positive denominator, and on such a representative m/n one has m/n>0 exactly when m>0 in Z; a positive integer is the image of a unique natural ≥1, so then m≥1.

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Put u:=(a1/n)m and v:=(a1/q)p; since a>0 we have a1/n>0 and a1/q>0, hence u>0 and v>0.

L1L3
1.2

The hypothesis m/n=p/q says exactly that mq=pn in Z, and nq≥1.

L4
2.1

Raising u to the power nq and using the iterated-power law twice: unq=((a1/n)m)nq=(a1/n)mnq=((a1/n)n)mq=amq.

step 1.1L1L2
2.2

The same computation for v: vnq=((a1/q)p)nq=(a1/q)pnq=((a1/q)q)pn=apn.

step 1.1L1L2
3.1

Since mq=pn, the two right-hand sides agree, so unq=amq=apn=vnq.

step 2.1step 2.2step 1.2
4.1

Both u and v are positive and nq≥1, so injectivity of x↦xnq on the nonnegatives forces u=v, which is the displayed identity; hence ar is independent of the representative, and in the supplementary case a=0 with r>0 every representative m/n of r with n≥1 has m>0 in Z, hence m≥1, so (01/n)m=0m=0 for all of them.

step 3.1step 1.1step 1.2L1L3L5∎

Depends on

Used by

Cited to discharge well-definedness by Rational powers aʳ of a positive base.

Dependency tree · two levels

41 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources