How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The exponential definition of real powers agrees with the existing rational powers
Statement
If and , then the real power agrees with the rational power of Rational powers of a positive base. For , both conventions also give .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A positive real and a rational with .
Rational powers satisfy , are positive for positive base, and obey the rational power laws (Rational powers of a positive base, Laws of rational exponents).
For positive reals, , , and is injective (Order, continuity, range, and the product, quotient, and reciprocal laws for the natural logarithm).
The real-power definition is (Real powers for positive bases, with the zero-base positive-exponent convention).
Proof
For , the product law for gives .
Injectivity of gives , and exponentiating gives .
This is the new real power at exponent ; negative rational exponents follow by reciprocals, and the stated convention agrees with Rational powers of a positive base for .
Depends on
Used by
- Every rational approximation to a real exponent gives the same limiting real power Corollary
- r² sin(1/r) is differentiable at the origin with a discontinuous gradient Example
- The surface generated by rotating y=sin x on [0,π] has area 2π(√2+arsinh1) Example
- Integral geometric layers exist, cover the partition, and retain the required cutoff bounds Lemma
- Successive small integral geometric layers contradict a large X-part Lemma
- Every finite family with the Erdős–Hajnal property is viral Theorem
- Every P₃-free graph G satisfies hom(G)≥√|V(G)| Theorem
- Landau's root limit: log x is the limit of 2ⁿ times (x^(1/2ⁿ) minus 1) Theorem
- Nikiforov: for every H and every ε∈(0,1/2) there is δ>0 such that every graph G with ind_H(G)<(δ|V(G)|)^|V(H)| has an ε-restricted vertex set of size at least δ|V(G)| Theorem
- The Erdos-Hajnal property is equivalent to the large-cograph, large-perfect, and kappa formulations Theorem
- The rational-supremum construction of real powers agrees with the exponential construction Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
23 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- J. Lebl, Basic Analysis, Logarithm and Exponential (standard reference, not scraped)
- MIT OpenCourseWare 18.100B Real Analysis, Spring 2025 full lecture notes (standard reference, not scraped)