How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Every rational approximation to a real exponent gives the same limiting real power
Statement
Let , let , and let be a rational sequence converging to . Then . Hence the limit is independent of the rational approximating sequence and equals the rational-supremum value .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: , , and rational .
The rational-supremum and exponential constructions agree (The rational-supremum construction of real powers agrees with the exponential construction).
Rational powers agree with real powers, and is continuous (The exponential definition of real powers agrees with the existing rational powers, Continuity and derivatives of positive-base real powers).
Proof
For every , rational-exponent agreement gives .
Continuity of gives .
Since , this limit is independent of the chosen rational sequence and has the asserted supremum value.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 68 results over 16 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- J. Lebl, Basic Analysis, Logarithm and Exponential (standard reference, not scraped)
- MIT OpenCourseWare 18.100B Real Analysis, Spring 2025 full lecture notes (standard reference, not scraped)