How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Young's partition estimate for rational Hölder exponents
Statement
Let satisfy . Suppose and on . If is the partition into equal intervals and is its left-endpoint Stieltjes sum, then
Put and If refines an arbitrary partition , then their left-endpoint sums satisfy
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Rational Hölder exponents with , Hölder constants , and the stated partitions.
Rational powers are monotone and satisfy the exponent laws (Rational powers of a positive base, Laws of rational exponents, Monotonicity of and of ).
A geometric series with ratio in converges and its tails tend to zero (For , , and for the series diverges).
Finite sums obey the triangle inequality and may be regrouped (Laws of finite sums and finite products, The triangle inequality).
Proof
Insert a point between adjacent points . The change from the old left-endpoint term to the two new terms is [given] up to sign. Its absolute value is at most , hence at most by [L1].
Passing from to inserts one midpoint in each of intervals of length . Summing step 1.1 gives the first displayed bound. More generally, if a partition of an interval has subintervals, some interior point has two adjacent lengths whose sum is at most : the sum of all such two-interval lengths is at most . Removing that point therefore changes the left sum by at most .
Remove the extra points of inside a fixed interval of , one at a time, always using step 2.1. The total error is at most . Grouping the positive integers into bounds this series by via [L2]. Thus the error on is at most . Summing over and using proves the refinement estimate. If or , every error is zero.
Depends on
- Lipschitz map, $\alpha$-Hölder map for rational $0 < \alpha \le 1$, and contraction
- Rational powers $a^r$ of a positive base
- Laws of rational exponents
- Monotonicity of $r \mapsto a^{r}$ and of $a \mapsto a^{r}$
- For $|r| < 1$, $\sum_{k \ge 0} r^k = 1/(1-r)$, and for $|r| \ge 1$ the series diverges
- Partition of $[a,b]$ as a finite strictly increasing list $a = t_0 < t_1 < \dots < t_n = b$, its subintervals and their lengths, its mesh, refinement, and the common refinement of two partitions
- Finite sums and finite products, by recursion
- Laws of finite sums and finite products
- The triangle inequality
Used by
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 97 results over 24 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Nourdin, Nualart, and Peccati, The Breuer–Major theorem in total variation: improved rates under minimal regularity, Section 2.2 (standard reference, not scraped)