Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passaudited 2026-08-11
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Young's partition estimate for rational Hölder exponents

Statement

Let p,qQ(0,1]p,q\in\mathbb Q\cap(0,1] satisfy p+q>1p+q>1. Suppose f(y)f(x)Kfyxp|f(y)-f(x)|\le K_f|y-x|^p and g(y)g(x)Kgyxq|g(y)-g(x)|\le K_g|y-x|^q on [a,b][a,b]. If DmD_m is the partition into 2m2^m equal intervals and LmL_m is its left-endpoint Stieltjes sum, then

Lm+1LmKfKg(ba)p+q2m(p+q1).|L_{m+1}-L_m|\le K_fK_g(b-a)^{p+q}2^{-m(p+q-1)}.

Put r=p+qr=p+q and Cr:=2r121r.C_r:=\frac{2^r}{1-2^{1-r}}. If RR refines an arbitrary partition PP, then their left-endpoint sums satisfy L(R)L(P)CrKfKg(ba)Pr1.|L(R)-L(P)|\le C_rK_fK_g(b-a)\lVert P\rVert^{r-1}.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Rational Hölder exponents p,qp,q with p+q>1p+q>1, Hölder constants Kf,KgK_f,K_g, and the stated partitions.

[L3]

Finite sums obey the triangle inequality and may be regrouped (Laws of finite sums and finite products, The triangle inequality).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Insert a point vv between adjacent points u<wu<w. The change from the old left-endpoint term to the two new terms is [given] (f(v)f(u))(g(w)g(v))(f(v)-f(u))(g(w)-g(v)) up to sign. Its absolute value is at most KfKg(vu)p(wv)qK_fK_g(v-u)^p(w-v)^q, hence at most KfKg(wu)p+qK_fK_g(w-u)^{p+q} by [L1].

2.1

Passing from DmD_m to Dm+1D_{m+1} inserts one midpoint in each of 2m2^m intervals of length (ba)2m(b-a)2^{-m}. Summing step 1.1 gives the first displayed bound. More generally, if a partition of an interval II has k2k\ge2 subintervals, some interior point has two adjacent lengths whose sum is at most 2I/(k1)2|I|/(k-1): the sum of all such two-interval lengths is at most 2I2|I|. Removing that point therefore changes the left sum by at most KfKg(2I/(k1))rK_fK_g(2|I|/(k-1))^r.

step 1.1L1L3
3.1

Remove the extra points of RR inside a fixed interval II of PP, one at a time, always using step 2.1. The total error is at most 2rKfKgIrj1jr2^rK_fK_g|I|^r\sum_{j\ge1}j^{-r}. Grouping the positive integers into [2m,2m+1)[2^m,2^{m+1}) bounds this series by m02m(r1)=(121r)1\sum_{m\ge0}2^{-m(r-1)}=(1-2^{1-r})^{-1} via [L2]. Thus the error on II is at most CrKfKgIrC_rK_fK_g|I|^r. Summing over IPI\in P and using IrPr1I|I|^r\le\lVert P\rVert^{r-1}|I| proves the refinement estimate. If KfKg=0K_fK_g=0 or a=ba=b, every error is zero.

step 2.1L1L2L3

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · next 3 levels

Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 97 results over 24 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.

Sources