Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (z-ai/glm-5.2)audited 2026-07-27
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

⋅ on [0,∞) is uniformly continuous and exactly 1/2-Hölder, and is not Lipschitz

Example

Let X:=[0,∞)⊆R (Intervals of R: the nine order-convex forms, nondegeneracy, and length) with the metric d(x,y)=∣x−y∣ inherited from R (The absolute value makes R a metric space: d(x,y)=∣x−y∣ is a metric, its open balls are the intervals (x−r,x+r), and it is unbounded, Isometry, isometric embedding, and the subspace metric on a subset), and let g:X→X be g(x):=x=x1/2 (Square roots exist: a unique a≥0 with (a)2=a; the positives are {x2:x≠0}, Rational powers ar of a positive base). Then:

  1. ∣x−y∣≤∣x−y∣1/2 for all x,y≥0, so g is 1/2-Hölder with constant 1 (Lipschitz map, α-Hölder map for rational 0<α≤1, and contraction).
  2. g is uniformly continuous (Uniform continuity of a map of metric spaces: one δ serving every point).
  3. The constant 1 cannot be improved: every 1/2-Hölder constant C for g satisfies C≥1.
  4. For every rational α with 1/2<α≤1, the map g is not α-Hölder. In particular, at α=1, g is not Lipschitz.

So 1/2 is exactly the Hölder exponent of the square root, and the example separates "Hölder" from "Lipschitz" inside Contraction implies Lipschitz implies uniformly continuous implies continuous; every Hölder map is uniformly continuous, and a Lipschitz map on a bounded space is Hölder for every exponent.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: X=[0,∞) with the metric inherited from R; g(x)=x; reals x,y∈X; a rational α with 0<α≤1; a real C≥0.

[L1]

Every a≥0 has a unique a≥0 with (a)2=a, and a1/2=a; the base 0 is covered, with 0r=0 for rational r>0 (Square roots exist: a unique a≥0 with (a)2=a; the positives are {x2:x≠0}, Rational powers ar of a positive base, Order on the rationals).

[L2]

For a,b≥0: a≤b if and only if a2≤b2; and squares are nonnegative (Squaring is monotone on the nonnegatives, Squares of nonzero elements are positive).

[L3]

Rational power laws for a positive base: ar>0, ar+s=aras, a−r=1/ar, (ar)s=ars, and (ab)r=arbr (Laws of rational exponents).

[L4]

Monotonicity in the base: for rational r>0 and 0<a<b one has ar<br (Monotonicity of r↦ar and of a↦ar).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1

Both sides of the inequality of claim 1 are symmetric in x and y, so it is enough to prove it when x≥y≥0; then x≥y and ∣x−y∣=x−y.

L2L6
1.2

Claim 4: let α be rational with 1/2<α≤1, put β:=α−1/2, a positive rational, and suppose ∣x−y∣≤C ∣x−y∣α for all x,y≥0 with some real C≥0. Taking y=0 gives t1/2≤C tα for every real t>0.

L1L3L5
2.1

With x≥y≥0 put u:=y+x−y≥0. Then u2=y+2yx−y+(x−y)=x+2yx−y≥x, the added term being a product of nonnegatives.

step 1.1L1L2
2.2

At t=1 this reads 1≤C, so C>0; and dividing the inequality of step 1.2 by tα>0 gives t1/2−α=t−β=1/tβ≤C, hence tβ≥1/C for every real t>0.

step 1.2L3L5
3.1

Since u≥0, x≥0 and (x)2=x≤u2, we get x≤u=y+x−y, hence ∣x−y∣=x−y≤x−y=∣x−y∣1/2. This is claim 1, with Hölder constant 1 and exponent 1/2.

step 1.1step 2.1L1L2
3.2

Apply this at t=1/n for a natural n≥1: (1/n)β=1/nβ, so 1/nβ≥1/C and therefore nβ≤C for every n≥1.

step 2.2L3L5
4.1

By [L7] a 1/2-Hölder map is uniformly continuous, so g is uniformly continuous: claim 2.

step 3.1L7
4.2

Claim 3: suppose ∣x−y∣≤C ∣x−y∣1/2 for all x,y≥0. Taking y=0 and x=1 gives 1=1≤C⋅11/2=C, so C≥1.

step 3.1L1L3
5.1

But C>0, so C1/β is a positive real and [L5] supplies a natural n≥1 with n>C1/β; raising to the positive rational power β gives nβ>(C1/β)β=C, contradicting step 3.2. So no such C exists and g is not α-Hölder: claim 4, and at α=1 it says g is not Lipschitz.

step 2.2step 3.2L3L4L5∎

Remarks

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

53 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources