Alphabeta Math
CounterexampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-generatedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passjudge pass (z-ai/glm-5.2)audited 2026-07-27
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

xxx \mapsto \sqrt{x} is a uniformly continuous bijection of [0,)[0,\infty) onto itself whose inverse xx2x \mapsto x^2 is not uniformly continuous

Statement refuted

Refuted claim: the inverse of a uniformly continuous bijection of metric spaces is uniformly continuous (Uniform continuity of a map of metric spaces: one δ\delta serving every point, Injection, surjection, bijection).

Let X:=[0,)RX := [0,\infty) \subseteq \mathbb{R} (Intervals of R\mathbb{R}: the nine order-convex forms, nondegeneracy, and length) with the metric inherited from the real line (The absolute value makes R\mathbb{R} a metric space: d(x,y)=xyd(x,y) = |x-y| is a metric, its open balls are the intervals (xr,x+r)(x-r, x+r), and it is unbounded, Isometry, isometric embedding, and the subspace metric on a subset), and let

g:XX,g(x):=x,h:XX,h(x):=x2.g : X \to X, \quad g(x) := \sqrt{x}, \qquad h : X \to X, \quad h(x) := x^{2}.

Then gg is a bijection of XX onto itself with inverse hh; gg is uniformly continuous; and hh is not uniformly continuous, the pairs n+1/nn + 1/n and nn defeating every candidate δ\delta at ε=2\varepsilon = 2.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: X=[0,)X = [0,\infty) with the metric inherited from R\mathbb{R}; the maps g(x)=xg(x) = \sqrt x and h(x)=x2h(x) = x^2; a natural n1n \ge 1; reals ε,δ>0\varepsilon, \delta > 0.

[L2]

For a,b0a,b \ge 0: aba \le b if and only if a2b2a^2 \le b^2 (Squaring is monotone on the nonnegatives).

[L4]

Factorisation of a difference of squares: x2y2=(xy)(x+y)x^2 - y^2 = (x-y)(x+y) (Factorisation of bnanb^n - a^n, and the resulting Lipschitz estimate).

[L7]

Uniform continuity: one δ>0\delta > 0 per ε>0\varepsilon > 0 serving every pair (Uniform continuity of a map of metric spaces: one δ\delta serving every point).

Counterexample

technique · direct
1.1

gg and hh map XX into XX: x0\sqrt x \ge 0 for x0x \ge 0 by [L1], and x20x^2 \ge 0 for every real xx.

L1L2
1.2

gg is uniformly continuous on XX.

L3L7
1.3

For every real t>0t > 0 and every x,y0x,y \ge 0: h(x)h(y)=x2y2=(xy)(x+y)h(x) - h(y) = x^2 - y^2 = (x-y)(x+y).

L4
2.1

h(g(x))=(x)2=xh(g(x)) = (\sqrt x)^2 = x for every x0x \ge 0, and g(h(x))=x2=xg(h(x)) = \sqrt{x^2} = x for every x0x \ge 0, the latter because x0x \ge 0 and x2=x2x^2 = x^2 make xx the unique nonnegative square root of x2x^2. So gg and hh are mutually inverse bijections of XX onto itself.

step 1.1L1L2
2.2

Fix a real δ>0\delta > 0 and take a natural n1n \ge 1 with 1/n<δ1/n < \delta; put x:=n+1/nx := n + 1/n and y:=ny := n, both in XX. Then xy=1/n<δ|x - y| = 1/n < \delta.

step 1.3L5L6
3.1

But h(x)h(y)=(xy)(x+y)=1n(2n+1n)=2+1n2>2h(x) - h(y) = (x-y)(x+y) = \dfrac{1}{n}\Big(2n + \dfrac1n\Big) = 2 + \dfrac{1}{n^2} > 2. So the pair (x,y)(x,y) satisfies xy<δ|x-y| < \delta and h(x)h(y)>2|h(x)-h(y)| > 2.

step 1.3step 2.2L5L6
4.1

Since δ>0\delta > 0 was arbitrary, no δ\delta witnesses the uniform continuity condition for hh at ε=2\varepsilon = 2, so hh is not uniformly continuous.

step 2.2step 3.1L7
5.1

Therefore gg is a uniformly continuous bijection of XX onto itself whose inverse hh is not uniformly continuous, which refutes the claim above.

step 2.1step 1.2step 4.1

Remarks

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · next 3 levels

Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 100 results over 31 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.

Sources