Alphabeta Math
CounterexampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (z-ai/glm-5.2)audited 2026-07-27
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

x↦x is a uniformly continuous bijection of [0,∞) onto itself whose inverse x↦x2 is not uniformly continuous

Statement refuted

Refuted claim: the inverse of a uniformly continuous bijection of metric spaces is uniformly continuous (Uniform continuity of a map of metric spaces: one δ serving every point, Injection, surjection, bijection).

Let X:=[0,∞)⊆R (Intervals of R: the nine order-convex forms, nondegeneracy, and length) with the metric inherited from the real line (The absolute value makes R a metric space: d(x,y)=∣x−y∣ is a metric, its open balls are the intervals (x−r,x+r), and it is unbounded, Isometry, isometric embedding, and the subspace metric on a subset), and let

g:X→X,g(x):=x,h:X→X,h(x):=x2.

Then g is a bijection of X onto itself with inverse h; g is uniformly continuous; and h is not uniformly continuous, the pairs n+1/n and n defeating every candidate δ at ε=2.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: X=[0,∞) with the metric inherited from R; the maps g(x)=x and h(x)=x2; a natural n≥1; reals ε,δ>0.

[L2]

For a,b≥0: a≤b if and only if a2≤b2 (Squaring is monotone on the nonnegatives).

[L4]

Factorisation of a difference of squares: x2−y2=(x−y)(x+y) (Factorisation of bn−an, and the resulting Lipschitz estimate).

[L7]

Uniform continuity: one δ>0 per ε>0 serving every pair (Uniform continuity of a map of metric spaces: one δ serving every point).

Counterexample

technique · direct
1.1

g and h map X into X: x≥0 for x≥0 by [L1], and x2≥0 for every real x.

L1L2
1.2

g is uniformly continuous on X.

L3L7
1.3

For every real t>0 and every x,y≥0: h(x)−h(y)=x2−y2=(x−y)(x+y).

L4
2.1

h(g(x))=(x)2=x for every x≥0, and g(h(x))=x2=x for every x≥0, the latter because x≥0 and x2=x2 make x the unique nonnegative square root of x2. So g and h are mutually inverse bijections of X onto itself.

step 1.1L1L2
2.2

Fix a real δ>0 and take a natural n≥1 with 1/n<δ; put x:=n+1/n and y:=n, both in X. Then ∣x−y∣=1/n<δ.

step 1.3L5L6
3.1

But h(x)−h(y)=(x−y)(x+y)=1n(2n+1n)=2+1n2>2. So the pair (x,y) satisfies ∣x−y∣<δ and ∣h(x)−h(y)∣>2.

step 1.3step 2.2L5L6
4.1

Since δ>0 was arbitrary, no δ witnesses the uniform continuity condition for h at ε=2, so h is not uniformly continuous.

step 2.2step 3.1L7
5.1

Therefore g is a uniformly continuous bijection of X onto itself whose inverse h is not uniformly continuous, which refutes the claim above.

step 2.1step 1.2step 4.1∎

Remarks

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

60 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources