Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (z-ai/glm-5.2)audited 2026-07-28
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The standard unit families ek∈FN form a basis of the linear subspace of eventually zero families: an explicit infinite basis, built with no choice principle

Example

Let F be a field (Field) and let FN be the function space of all families x:N→F with the pointwise operations (The vector space FX of all functions X→F with pointwise operations, and Fn as the case X=n={0,1,…,n−1}); N contains 0 (The natural numbers N (von Neumann)). Put

E  :=  { x∈FN  :  there is N∈N with x(n)=0F for every n≥N },

the eventually zero families, and for k∈N let ek∈FN be the standard unit family with ek(k)=1F and ek(n)=0F for n≠k. Write B:={ ek:k∈N }. Then:

  1. E is a linear subspace of FN (Linear subspace of a vector space);
  2. B⊆E and span⁡(B)=E (Linear combination of a finite list, and the span span⁡(S) as the smallest linear subspace containing S);
  3. B is linearly independent (Linear independence: a finite list v:n→V is independent when ∑i<nλivi=0V forces every λi=0F, and a subset S⊆V is independent when every injective finite list into S is independent), hence a basis of E (Basis of a vector space: a linearly independent spanning subset; and ordered basis: an injective finite list whose image is a basis), and k↦ek is a bijection N→B, so B≈N (Equinumerous sets, A≈B and A⪯B);
  4. E is infinite-dimensional over F (Finite-dimensional vector space, and its dimension dim⁡FV; infinite-dimensional means having no finite basis): it has no finite basis.

No choice principle is used anywhere below: the basis is written down.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A field F, the vector space FN with pointwise operations, the set E of eventually zero families, the families ek, and B={ ek:k∈N }.

[L1]

FX is a vector space over F with (x+y)(n)=x(n)+y(n), (λx)(n)=λ x(n) and zero the constant family at 0F; two elements are equal exactly when they agree at every point (The vector space FX of all functions X→F with pointwise operations, and Fn as the case X=n={0,1,…,n−1}, Vector space over a field).

[L2]

One-step test: a nonempty W⊆V with λu+v∈W for all λ∈F, u,v∈W is a linear subspace; a linear subspace is a vector space in its own right, and independence and spans of its subsets agree with those computed in the ambient space (One-step subspace test: a nonempty W⊆V is a linear subspace if and only if λu+v∈W for all λ∈F and u,v∈W, Linear subspace of a vector space, Basis of a vector space: a linearly independent spanning subset; and ordered basis: an injective finite list whose image is a basis, section on bases of a linear subspace).

[L3]

span⁡(T) is the set of linear combinations ∑k<pμkyk of finite lists into T, and it is the smallest linear subspace containing T (span⁡(S) is exactly the set of linear combinations of finite lists of elements of S, and span⁡(∅)={0V}, Linear combination of a finite list, and the span span⁡(S) as the smallest linear subspace containing S).

[L5]

F is a vector space over itself (A field is a vector space over itself, and over any subfield K⊆F every F-vector space is a K-vector space by restricting the scalars, claim 1), so (F1) and (F3) apply to lists of scalars: an all-0F list sums to 0F, and a list vanishing off a single index sums to its value at that index (The sum U+W of two linear subspaces and the sum ∑i<nUi of a finite family).

[L9]

The order of N is total, m<σ(N)  ⟺  m≤N, and m<n implies m≠n (≤ is a linear order on N, Order on the natural numbers, On N the order is membership: m<n  ⟺  m∈n); induction (The principle of mathematical induction); injectivity and images (Injection, surjection, bijection).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1

Claim 1. E is nonempty: the zero family has value 0F everywhere, so N=0 witnesses that it lies in E. And E is closed under the one-step expression: for λ∈F and u,v∈E with witnesses N1 and N2, let N be the larger of the two, which exists because the order of N is total; then for n≥N we have n≥N1 and n≥N2, so (λu+v)(n)=λu(n)+v(n)=λ0F+0F=0F, and N witnesses λu+v∈E. So E is a linear subspace of FN by the one-step test.

L1L2L6L9
1.2

Each ek lies in E, so B⊆E: if n≥σ(k) then k<n, hence n≠k and ek(n)=0F, so σ(k) is a witness.

L9
1.3

For x∈FN and N∈N put sN:=∑k<Nx(k) ek. Then sN(n)=x(n) for n<N and sN(n)=0F for n≥N. Indeed sN(n)=∑k<N(x(k)ek)(n)=∑k<Nx(k) ek(n) by pointwise evaluation and pointwise scalar multiplication; the scalar list k↦x(k)ek(n) has the value x(k)0F=0F at every k≠n. If n<N this list vanishes off the single index n, where its value is x(n)1F=x(n), so the sum is x(n); if n≥N then no k<N equals n, the list is all 0F, and the sum is 0F.

L1L4L5L6L9
1.4

Claim 3, independence. The map k↦ek is injective, since ek(k)=1F≠0F=el(k) for l≠k. Let w:m→B be an injective finite list and λ:m→F with ∑j<mλjwj=0 in FN. Each wj is eij for exactly one ij∈N, and j↦ij is injective because w is. Fix j<m and evaluate at ij: pointwise evaluation gives 0F=∑l<mλl eil(ij), and eil(ij)=0F unless il=ij, that is unless l=j, where it is 1F. So the scalar list vanishes off the single index j and sums to λj1F=λj, giving λj=0F. Hence every injective finite list into B is independent, that is B is linearly independent.

L1L4L5L6L7L9
2.1

B≈N: the map k↦ek is injective by step 1.4 and its image is B by definition, so it is a bijection N→B.

step 1.4L9
2.2

Claim 2. Each ek lies in E and E is a linear subspace, so span⁡(B)⊆E by minimality of the span. Conversely let x∈E with witness N; then x and sN of step 1.3 agree at every n, since for n<N both take the value x(n) and for n≥N both take the value 0F, so x=sN=∑k<Nx(k)ek, a linear combination of elements of B. Hence E⊆span⁡(B).

step 1.1step 1.2step 1.3L1L3
3.1

Claim 4. Suppose E had a finite basis C, say with p elements. Then C is a spanning set of E with p elements, so no linearly independent subset of E is equinumerous with N. But B⊆E is linearly independent by step 1.4 and B≈N by step 2.1. So no finite basis exists and E is infinite-dimensional over F.

step 1.4step 2.1L8
4.1

Claim 3, that B is a basis of E. By step 1.4 the set B is linearly independent and by step 2.2 it spans E; independence and spans computed in the linear subspace E agree with those computed in FN, so B is a basis of the vector space E.

step 1.4step 2.2L2∎

Remarks

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

62 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources