How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced — the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted — a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated — a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Peano system
Definition
A Peano system is a triple consisting of a set , a distinguished element , and a successor function (A function is a relation with and implying ; , the value , domain and codomain), satisfying the three Peano axioms:
- (P1) Zero is not a successor. For every , .
- (P2) Successor is injective. For all , if then .
- (P3) Induction. For every subset (Subset , proper subset , and the separation notation ), if and whenever , then .
The elements of are the natural numbers of the system. We abbreviate , , , and so on.
Remarks
Axiom (P3), the induction axiom, is the load-bearing one: it says has no proper subset that contains and is closed under , so every element is reached from by finitely many successors. It is what makes definition by recursion and proof by induction legitimate (The principle of mathematical induction, The recursion theorem).
This is a structural definition: it does not say what the natural numbers are, only which laws they obey. Two questions are therefore separate and both require proof: that a Peano system exists (a model built inside set theory, The von Neumann naturals form a Peano system, from the von Neumann naturals The natural numbers (von Neumann)), and that it is unique up to a unique isomorphism (Categoricity: the natural numbers are unique up to unique isomorphism). Together these justify speaking of the natural numbers .
We use the modern -based convention (). Peano's original postulates started from ; the choice is immaterial, and starting at matches the set-theoretic construction, where .
Depends on
Used by
- Injectivity of the successor is independent of the other Peano axioms Counterexample
- The induction axiom is independent of the other Peano axioms Counterexample
- The natural numbers ℕ (von Neumann) Definition
- Categoricity: the natural numbers are unique up to unique isomorphism Theorem
- The recursion theorem Theorem
- The von Neumann naturals form a Peano system Theorem
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 16 results over 8 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Peano axioms (Wikipedia) (standard reference, not scraped)
- T. Tao, Analysis I, 3rd ed., §2.1 (Peano axioms) (standard reference, not scraped)
- W. Aitken, MATH 378 Ch. 1: The Peano Axioms (CSU San Marcos) (standard reference, not scraped)