Alphabeta Math
CounterexampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (z-ai/glm-5.2)audited 2026-07-26
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

xk+1=xk+1/xk from x1=1 has strictly decreasing consecutive gaps and diverges, so no uniform c<1 exists

Statement refuted

Refuted claim: a sequence whose consecutive gaps are strictly decreasing,

∣xk+2−xk+1∣<∣xk+1−xk∣for every k,

is contractive, or at least converges (Contractive sequence: ∣xk+2−xk+1∣≤c ∣xk+1−xk∣ for a fixed 0<c<1, Every contractive sequence is Cauchy, hence converges, with error bound ∣x−xk∣≤ck−1∣x2−x1∣/(1−c) for k≥1).

The witness is x1=1, xk+1=xk+1/xk. Its gaps are xk+1−xk=1/xk, strictly decreasing because (xk) is strictly increasing; and the sequence diverges to +∞ (Divergence to +∞ and to −∞). Since a contractive sequence converges (Every contractive sequence is Cauchy, hence converges, with error bound ∣x−xk∣≤ck−1∣x2−x1∣/(1−c) for k≥1), no contraction constant c<1 can exist for it: the ratios of consecutive gaps are all below 1 but have no bound below 1 that works at every index.

Indexing. Written on N the sequence is (gj) with g0=1 and gj+1=gj+1/gj, and xk:=gk−1 for k≥1 (Sequences of reals: bounded, eventually, frequently, tails, subsequences).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The set A:={u∈R:u≥1}, the element 1∈A, and the function f:A→A with f(u)=u+1/u, which lands in A because u≥1>0 gives 1/u>0 and hence f(u)>u≥1; by the recursion theorem (The recursion theorem) the unique g:N→A with g0=1 and gj+1=f(gj); and the gaps dj:=gj+1−gj.

[L1]

Recursion theorem (The recursion theorem) and induction principle (The principle of mathematical induction).

[L2]

Order and arithmetic: 1>0, so 2=1+1>0; sums of positives are positive; adding a constant preserves the order; a positive has a positive inverse, and 0<a<b gives 0<1/b<1/a (The multiplicative identity is positive, Order is preserved by adding a constant and by adding inequalities, Inverses of positives are positive, and reciprocation reverses order, Ordered field, Complete ordered field (least-upper-bound property)).

[L3]

Powers: (u+v)2=u2+2uv+v2 and u⋅(1/u)=1, so (u+1/u)2=u2+2+1/u2; and for a,b≥0, a<b exactly when a2<b2 (Integer powers am, Monotonicity of x↦xn and of n↦an).

[L4]

Canonical naturals: positive for n≥1, and strictly increasing in the index (Canonical naturals are positive and strictly increasing); the Archimedean property (Every complete ordered field is Archimedean).

[L5]

Absolute value: ∣t∣=t for t≥0 and ∣t∣≥t (Basic properties of the absolute value).

[L6]
[L7]

Divergence to +∞ (Divergence to +∞ and to −∞); a convergent sequence is bounded (Every convergent sequence is bounded); convergence (Limits and Cauchy sequences of reals).

Counterexample

technique · direct
1.1

Every term satisfies gj≥1>0, since g takes values in A by construction.

givenL2
2.1

The sequence is strictly increasing: dj=gj+1−gj=1/gj>0, and consecutive comparisons give strict increase.

step 1.1L2L6
2.2

By induction, (gj)2≥1+2j for every j, where j denotes the canonical natural. Base: (g0)2=1=1+2⋅0. Step: (gj+1)2=(gj+1/gj)2=(gj)2+2+1/(gj)2>(gj)2+2≥(1+2j)+2=1+2(j+1).

step 1.1L1L2L3L4
3.1

The gaps are strictly decreasing: 0<gj<gj+1 gives 0<1/gj+1<1/gj, that is 0<dj+1<dj; and ∣dj+1∣<∣dj∣ since both are positive.

step 1.1step 2.1L2L5
3.2

(gj) diverges to +∞. Let M∈R and put M′:=∣M∣≥M, so M′≥0. By [L4] fix a natural n≥1 with (M′)2<n. Then (gn)2≥1+2n>n>(M′)2, and since gn≥0 and M′≥0 this gives gn>M′≥M; for every k≥n strict increase gives gk≥gn>M.

step 2.1step 2.2L3L4L5L7
4.1

(gj) does not converge: a convergent sequence is bounded, whereas step 3.2 exhibits terms above every real.

step 3.2L7
5.1

No c with 0<c<1 is a contraction constant for (gj): if one were, the sequence would be contractive and would converge, contradicting step 4.1.

step 4.1L8
6.1

So (gj), that is (xk), has strictly decreasing consecutive gaps by step 3.1, diverges to +∞ by step 3.2, and admits no uniform c<1 by step 5.1: strictly decreasing gaps neither make a sequence contractive nor make it converge.

step 3.1step 3.2step 5.1L8∎

Remarks

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

58 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources