Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-generatedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passjudge pass (z-ai/glm-5.2)audited 2026-07-27
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Stolz-Cesaro gives (1+2++n)/n21/2(1 + 2 + \dots + n)/n^2 \to 1/2 and (1p++np)/np+11/(p+1)(1^p + \dots + n^p)/n^{p+1} \to 1/(p+1) for natural pp

Example

Fix a natural number p1p \ge 1 and put

an  :=  k=0nkp  =  1p+2p++np,bn  :=  np+1,a_n \;:=\; \sum_{k=0}^{n} k^p \;=\; 1^p + 2^p + \dots + n^p, \qquad b_n \;:=\; n^{p+1},

the first equality because 0p=00^p = 0 for p1p \ge 1 (Integer powers ama^m). Then (bn)(b_n) is strictly increasing and unbounded with b0=0b_0 = 0 and bn>0b_n > 0 for n1n \ge 1, so Stolz-Cesaro, /\infty/\infty form: if bkb_k is strictly increasing and unbounded and (ak+1ak)/(bk+1bk)L(a_{k+1}-a_k)/(b_{k+1}-b_k) \to L then ak/bkLa_k/b_k \to L applies with K0=1K_0 = 1, and

limn1p+2p++npnp+1  =  1p+1,\lim_{n} \frac{1^p + 2^p + \dots + n^p}{n^{p+1}} \;=\; \frac{1}{p+1},

the limit being taken over the indices n1n \ge 1, where the quotient is defined. For p=1p = 1 this is

limn1+2++nn2  =  12.\lim_{n} \frac{1 + 2 + \dots + n}{n^2} \;=\; \frac12 .

No closed form for ana_n is used. That is the point of the example: the difference quotient of Stolz-Cesaro replaces a summation formula by a single algebraic identity, the factorisation of (n+1)p+1np+1(n+1)^{p+1} - n^{p+1}.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A natural p1p \ge 1, the sequences an=k=0nkpa_n = \sum_{k=0}^{n} k^p and bn=np+1b_n = n^{p+1}, and their difference quotients dn=(an+1an)/(bn+1bn)d_n = (a_{n+1}-a_n)/(b_{n+1}-b_n).

[L1]

Stolz-Cesaro in the /\infty/\infty form: for (bn)(b_n) strictly increasing with range not bounded above and (dn)(d_n) convergent, the tail of (an/bn)(a_n/b_n) beyond an index where bb becomes positive converges to limndn\lim_n d_n (Stolz-Cesaro, /\infty/\infty form: if bkb_k is strictly increasing and unbounded and (ak+1ak)/(bk+1bk)L(a_{k+1}-a_k)/(b_{k+1}-b_k) \to L then ak/bkLa_k/b_k \to L); convergence depends only on a tail (Convergence depends only on the tail); limits are unique (A sequence has at most one limit).

[L2]

Powers: a0=1a^0 = 1, an+1=anaa^{n+1} = a^n a, so 0p=00^p = 0 for p1p \ge 1 (Integer powers ama^m); am+n=amana^{m+n} = a^m a^n and am=(am)1a^{-m} = (a^m)^{-1} for a0a \ne 0 (Laws of integer exponents); for 0a<b0 \le a < b and n1n \ge 1, an<bna^n < b^n, and a1a \ge 1 with n1n \ge 1 gives anaa^n \ge a (Monotonicity of xxnx \mapsto x^n and of nann \mapsto a^n).

[L3]

Factorisation: bmam=(ba)k=0m1akbm1kb^m - a^m = (b-a)\sum_{k=0}^{m-1}a^k b^{\,m-1-k} for m1m \ge 1 (Factorisation of bnanb^n - a^n, and the resulting Lipschitz estimate).

[L5]

Algebra of limits for sums, products, scalar multiples and quotients with nonvanishing denominators (Algebra of limits: sums, scalar multiples, products and quotients); convergence of real sequences (Limits and Cauchy sequences of reals, Sequences of reals: bounded, eventually, frequently, tails, subsequences).

[L7]
[L8]

Order arithmetic: canonical naturals are positive and strictly increasing (Canonical naturals are positive and strictly increasing); a positive element has a positive inverse and reciprocation reverses the order (Inverses of positives are positive, and reciprocation reverses order); adding a constant preserves the order and inequalities add (Order is preserved by adding a constant and by adding inequalities); the order is total and transitive (Complete ordered field (least-upper-bound property), Ordered field).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1

(bn)(b_n) is strictly increasing: for naturals m<nm < n one has 0m<n0 \le m < n and p+11p + 1 \ge 1, so mp+1<np+1m^{p+1} < n^{p+1}.

L2L6L8
1.2

The range of (bn)(b_n) is not bounded above: n1n \ge 1 gives np+1nn^{p+1} \ge n, and no real bounds every canonical natural.

L2L6L8
1.3

b0=0p+1=0b_0 = 0^{p+1} = 0 and bn>0b_n > 0 for n1n \ge 1, so K0=1K_0 = 1 is an index beyond which bb is positive.

L2L8
1.4

an+1an=(n+1)pa_{n+1} - a_n = (n+1)^p and bn+1bn=(n+1)p+1np+1b_{n+1} - b_n = (n+1)^{p+1} - n^{p+1}, so dn=(n+1)p((n+1)p+1np+1)1d_n = (n+1)^p\big((n+1)^{p+1} - n^{p+1}\big)^{-1}.

L2L4
1.5

Put τn:=n(n+1)1\tau_n := n\,(n+1)^{-1}; then 1τn=(n+1)11 - \tau_n = (n+1)^{-1}, so given a real ε>0\varepsilon > 0 and a natural m1m \ge 1 with 1/m<ε1/m < \varepsilon one has τn1=(n+1)1<ε|\tau_n - 1| = (n+1)^{-1} < \varepsilon for all nmn \ge m, that is limnτn=1\lim_n \tau_n = 1.

L5L6L8
2.1

By the factorisation at m=p+1m = p+1, b=n+1b = n+1 and a=na = n: (n+1)p+1np+1=((n+1)n)k=0pnk(n+1)pk=k=0pnk(n+1)pk(n+1)^{p+1} - n^{p+1} = \big((n+1) - n\big)\sum_{k=0}^{p} n^k (n+1)^{p-k} = \sum_{k=0}^{p} n^k (n+1)^{p-k}.

step 1.4L3L4
2.2

By induction on kk, using the product rule for limits, limnτnk=1\lim_n \tau_n^{\,k} = 1 for every kk; by induction on pp, using the sum rule, limnk=0pτnk=p+1\lim_n \sum_{k=0}^{p}\tau_n^{\,k} = p+1.

step 1.5L5L7
3.1

Dividing numerator and denominator of dnd_n by (n+1)p>0(n+1)^p > 0 and using nk(n+1)pk(n+1)p=τnkn^k(n+1)^{p-k}(n+1)^{-p} = \tau_n^{\,k} gives dn=(k=0pτnk)1d_n = \big(\sum_{k=0}^{p}\tau_n^{\,k}\big)^{-1}, and k=0pτnk1>0\sum_{k=0}^{p}\tau_n^{\,k} \ge 1 > 0 for every nn, the term at k=0k = 0 being 11 and all terms being 0\ge 0.

step 1.4step 1.5step 2.1L2L4L8
4.1

Since the denominators are nonzero and their limit p+1p+1 is nonzero, the quotient rule gives limndn=(p+1)1\lim_n d_n = (p+1)^{-1}.

step 2.2step 3.1L5L8
5.1

Steps 1.1, 1.2 and 4.1 are the hypotheses of Stolz-Cesaro, so the tail jaj+1/bj+1j \mapsto a_{j+1}/b_{j+1} converges to (p+1)1(p+1)^{-1}; that is, limn(1p++np)n(p+1)=(p+1)1\lim_{n}\big(1^p + \dots + n^p\big)n^{-(p+1)} = (p+1)^{-1} over the indices n1n \ge 1.

step 1.1step 1.2step 1.3step 4.1L1
6.1

At p=1p = 1 this reads limn(1+2++n)n2=1/2\lim_n (1 + 2 + \dots + n)n^{-2} = 1/2.

step 5.1

Remarks

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · next 3 levels

Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 96 results over 28 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.

Sources