Alphabeta Math
CounterexampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passaudited 2026-07-26
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The truncated decimal approximations of 2\sqrt{2} form a Cauchy sequence of rationals with no rational limit

Statement refuted

Refuted claim: every Cauchy sequence of rationals converges to a rational; equivalently, Q\mathbb{Q} is complete (FALSE: the rationals are complete, The rationals as equivalence classes of pairs of integers).

The witness is the sequence of truncated decimal approximations of 2\sqrt 2, s0=1s_0 = 1, s1=1.4s_1 = 1.4, s2=1.41s_2 = 1.41, s3=1.414s_3 = 1.414, and so on: sn=kn/10ns_n = k_n/10^n where knk_n is the largest natural number with kn22102nk_n^2 \le 2 \cdot 10^{2n}. That this sequence is Cauchy in Q\mathbb{Q} and has no rational limit is proved in full in FALSE: the rationals are complete and is not repeated here.

What this item adds is the view from R\mathbb{R}, which is what makes the witness informative rather than merely negative: the same sequence converges in R\mathbb{R}, and its limit is 2\sqrt 2. So the defect is not in the sequence but in Q\mathbb{Q}, and the contrast is exactly The Cauchy criterion from the least-upper-bound property: in a complete ordered field every Cauchy sequence converges, which says that a Cauchy sequence of reals never behaves this way.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: For nNn \in \mathbb{N} the rational sn=kn/10ns_n = k_n/10^n, where knk_n is the largest natural with kn22102nk_n^2 \le 2 \cdot 10^{2n}, together with the properties established for it in FALSE: the rationals are complete; and the real 2\sqrt 2 (Square roots exist: a unique a0\sqrt{a} \ge 0 with (a)2=a(\sqrt{a})^2 = a; the positives are {x2:x0}\{x^2 : x \neq 0\}). Rationals are identified with their images in R\mathbb{R} under the embedding qq^q \mapsto \hat q (The rationals embed densely in the reals), so (sn)(s_n) is also a sequence of reals (Sequences of reals: bounded, eventually, frequently, tails, subsequences).

[L1]

The construction and its properties: sn0s_n \ge 0, sn22<(sn+10n)2s_n^2 \le 2 < (s_n + 10^{-n})^2, and (sn)(s_n) is a Cauchy sequence of rationals with no rational limit (FALSE: the rationals are complete).

[L2]

The embedding qq^q \mapsto \hat q is an injective, order-preserving field homomorphism of Q\mathbb{Q} into R\mathbb{R}, so every identity and inequality between rationals holds between their images and conversely (The rationals embed densely in the reals, The rationals as equivalence classes of pairs of integers).

[L3]
[L4]

Powers and order: for a,b0a, b \ge 0, aba \le b exactly when a2b2a^2 \le b^2, and a<ba < b exactly when a2<b2a^2 < b^2 (Monotonicity of xxnx \mapsto x^n and of nann \mapsto a^n); and (1/t)n=1/tn=tn(1/t)^n = 1/t^n = t^{-n} for t0t \ne 0 (Laws of integer exponents).

[L9]

No rational squares to 22 (FALSE: some rational number squares to 2).

Counterexample

technique · direct
1.1

The inequalities of [L1] hold verbatim in R\mathbb{R}, since the embedding preserves the order and the field operations.

givenL1L2
1.2

0<1/10<10 < 1/10 < 1 and (1/10)n=10n(1/10)^n = 10^{-n} for every nn.

givenL4L5
2.1

From sn0s_n \ge 0, 20\sqrt 2 \ge 0 and sn22=(2)2s_n^2 \le 2 = (\sqrt 2)^2 we get sn2s_n \le \sqrt 2; from (2)2=2<(sn+10n)2(\sqrt 2)^2 = 2 < (s_n + 10^{-n})^2 with both bases 0\ge 0 we get 2<sn+10n\sqrt 2 < s_n + 10^{-n}. Hence 02sn<10n0 \le \sqrt 2 - s_n < 10^{-n} for every nn.

step 1.1L3L4
2.2

The sequence (10n)=((1/10)n)(10^{-n}) = ((1/10)^n) converges to 00.

step 1.2L6
3.1

The constant sequence 00 and the sequence (10n)(10^{-n}) both converge to 00, and 02sn10n0 \le \sqrt 2 - s_n \le 10^{-n} at every index, so the squeeze theorem gives 2sn0\sqrt 2 - s_n \to 0; by the algebra of limits sn=2(2sn)2s_n = \sqrt 2 - (\sqrt 2 - s_n) \to \sqrt 2.

step 2.1step 2.2L7
4.1

In particular (sn)(s_n) converges in R\mathbb{R} and is therefore Cauchy as a sequence of reals; this is the behaviour The Cauchy criterion from the least-upper-bound property: in a complete ordered field every Cauchy sequence converges guarantees for every Cauchy sequence of reals, and it is what fails in Q\mathbb{Q}.

step 3.1L8
4.2

Suppose (sn)(s_n) converged to a rational qq. Then in R\mathbb{R} it converges to q^\hat q, so q^=2\hat q = \sqrt 2 by uniqueness of limits, hence q^2=2\hat q^{\,2} = 2; the embedding is injective and preserves squaring, so q2=2q^2 = 2 in Q\mathbb{Q}.

step 3.1L2L3L8
5.1

No rational squares to 22, so no such qq exists: (sn)(s_n) is a Cauchy sequence of rationals with no rational limit, and the claim that Q\mathbb{Q} is complete is refuted.

step 4.2L1L9

Remarks

  • The limit exists; it is merely not rational. That is the entire content of the counterexample and the reason the construction of R\mathbb{R} is worth doing. The sequence is Cauchy in Q\mathbb{Q}, so Q\mathbb{Q} "should" have a limit for it, and the point at which it converges lies outside Q\mathbb{Q}.

  • Decimal truncation is a convenience, not the mechanism. Any sequence of rationals converging to any irrational does the same job, for instance the Babylonian iterates of The Babylonian sequence x1=2x_1 = 2, xk+1=(xk+2/xk)/2x_{k+1} = (x_k + 2/x_k)/2 decreases to 2\sqrt{2} started at 22, which are all rational and converge to 2\sqrt 2. Truncated decimals are chosen because the two-sided estimate sn2<sn+10ns_n \le \sqrt 2 < s_n + 10^{-n} is immediate from the definition of knk_n and turns into convergence with one application of the squeeze theorem.

  • Note which completeness is which. FALSE: the rationals are complete refutes Cauchy completeness of Q\mathbb{Q}. Q\mathbb{Q} also fails the least-upper-bound property, on the same underlying fact that 2Q\sqrt 2 \notin \mathbb{Q}, and the two failures are not the same statement: Cauchy completeness and Dedekind completeness differ in general, and coincide only in the presence of the Archimedean property. Two independent proofs that R\mathbb{R} is Cauchy complete, and why the library records both records where this library stands on that.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · next 3 levels

Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 116 results over 32 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.

Sources