How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The truncated decimal approximations of form a Cauchy sequence of rationals with no rational limit
Statement refuted
Refuted claim: every Cauchy sequence of rationals converges to a rational; equivalently, is complete (FALSE: the rationals are complete, The rationals as equivalence classes of pairs of integers).
The witness is the sequence of truncated decimal approximations of , , , , , and so on: where is the largest natural number with . That this sequence is Cauchy in and has no rational limit is proved in full in FALSE: the rationals are complete and is not repeated here.
What this item adds is the view from , which is what makes the witness informative rather than merely negative: the same sequence converges in , and its limit is . So the defect is not in the sequence but in , and the contrast is exactly The Cauchy criterion from the least-upper-bound property: in a complete ordered field every Cauchy sequence converges, which says that a Cauchy sequence of reals never behaves this way.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: For the rational , where is the largest natural with , together with the properties established for it in FALSE: the rationals are complete; and the real (Square roots exist: a unique with ; the positives are ). Rationals are identified with their images in under the embedding (The rationals embed densely in the reals), so is also a sequence of reals (Sequences of reals: bounded, eventually, frequently, tails, subsequences).
The construction and its properties: , , and is a Cauchy sequence of rationals with no rational limit (FALSE: the rationals are complete).
The embedding is an injective, order-preserving field homomorphism of into , so every identity and inequality between rationals holds between their images and conversely (The rationals embed densely in the reals, The rationals as equivalence classes of pairs of integers).
Square roots: is the unique nonnegative real with (Square roots exist: a unique with ; the positives are , Integer powers ).
Powers and order: for , exactly when , and exactly when (Monotonicity of and of ); and for (Laws of integer exponents).
For the sequence converges to (For the sequence is null, and for the sequence diverges to ).
Squeeze theorem (The squeeze theorem) and the algebra of limits (Algebra of limits: sums, scalar multiples, products and quotients); a constant sequence converges to its value (Sequences of reals: bounded, eventually, frequently, tails, subsequences, Limits and Cauchy sequences of reals).
Every convergent sequence of reals is Cauchy (Every convergent sequence is Cauchy); every Cauchy sequence of reals converges (The Cauchy criterion from the least-upper-bound property: in a complete ordered field every Cauchy sequence converges); limits are unique (A sequence has at most one limit).
No rational squares to (FALSE: some rational number squares to 2).
Counterexample
The inequalities of [L1] hold verbatim in , since the embedding preserves the order and the field operations.
and for every .
From , and we get ; from with both bases we get . Hence for every .
The sequence converges to .
The constant sequence and the sequence both converge to , and at every index, so the squeeze theorem gives ; by the algebra of limits .
In particular converges in and is therefore Cauchy as a sequence of reals; this is the behaviour The Cauchy criterion from the least-upper-bound property: in a complete ordered field every Cauchy sequence converges guarantees for every Cauchy sequence of reals, and it is what fails in .
Suppose converged to a rational . Then in it converges to , so by uniqueness of limits, hence ; the embedding is injective and preserves squaring, so in .
No rational squares to , so no such exists: is a Cauchy sequence of rationals with no rational limit, and the claim that is complete is refuted.
Remarks
-
The limit exists; it is merely not rational. That is the entire content of the counterexample and the reason the construction of is worth doing. The sequence is Cauchy in , so "should" have a limit for it, and the point at which it converges lies outside .
-
Decimal truncation is a convenience, not the mechanism. Any sequence of rationals converging to any irrational does the same job, for instance the Babylonian iterates of The Babylonian sequence , decreases to started at , which are all rational and converge to . Truncated decimals are chosen because the two-sided estimate is immediate from the definition of and turns into convergence with one application of the squeeze theorem.
-
Note which completeness is which. FALSE: the rationals are complete refutes Cauchy completeness of . also fails the least-upper-bound property, on the same underlying fact that , and the two failures are not the same statement: Cauchy completeness and Dedekind completeness differ in general, and coincide only in the presence of the Archimedean property. Two independent proofs that is Cauchy complete, and why the library records both records where this library stands on that.
Depends on
- FALSE: the rationals are complete
- FALSE: some rational number squares to 2
- The rationals as equivalence classes of pairs of integers
- The rationals embed densely in the reals
- Limits and Cauchy sequences of reals
- Sequences of reals: bounded, eventually, frequently, tails, subsequences
- Square roots exist: a unique $\sqrt{a} \ge 0$ with $(\sqrt{a})^2 = a$; the positives are $\{x^2 : x \neq 0\}$
- The Cauchy criterion from the least-upper-bound property: in a complete ordered field every Cauchy sequence converges
- Every convergent sequence is Cauchy
- A sequence has at most one limit
- For $|r| < 1$ the sequence $r^k$ is null, and for $|r| > 1$ the sequence $|r|^k$ diverges to $+\infty$
- The squeeze theorem
- Algebra of limits: sums, scalar multiples, products and quotients
- Monotonicity of $x \mapsto x^n$ and of $n \mapsto a^n$
- Laws of integer exponents
- Integer powers $a^m$
- Inverses of positives are positive, and reciprocation reverses order
- Reciprocals and order: $1/r$ against $1$
- Basic properties of the absolute value
- Complete ordered field (least-upper-bound property)
- Ordered field
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 116 results over 32 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Completeness of the real numbers (Wikipedia) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Square root of 2 (Wikipedia) (standard reference, not scraped)
- T. Tao, Analysis I, 3rd ed., §5.1 and §5.4 (standard reference, not scraped)
- W. Rudin, Principles of Mathematical Analysis, 3rd ed., Ch. 1 and Ch. 3 (standard reference, not scraped)