Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (z-ai/glm-5.2)audited 2026-07-28
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

∫01x2=1/3, computed from the Darboux definition with uniform partitions and the closed form ∑k<nk2=n(n−1)(2n−1)/6

Example

Let f:[0,1]→R be f(x)=x2 (Integer powers am). Then f is Riemann integrable on [0,1] and

∫01x2 dx  =  13.

Everything is computed from the definition. For the uniform partition UN of [0,1] into N≥1 parts (Partition of [a,b] as a finite strictly increasing list a=t0<t1<⋯<tn=b, its subintervals and their lengths, its mesh, refinement, and the common refinement of two partitions) the two Darboux sums (For bounded f on [a,b] and a partition P: the infimum mi and supremum Mi of f on the i-th subinterval, and the lower and upper Darboux sums L(f,P)=∑imiΔi and U(f,P)=∑iMiΔi) are

L(f,UN)  =  (N−1)(2N−1)6N2,U(f,UN)  =  (N+1)(2N+1)6N2,U(f,UN)−L(f,UN)  =  1N,

where a natural N multiplying or dividing a real stands for its canonical natural ι(N) (The canonical natural ι(n)=n⋅1F of a field), as in clause 2 of Laws of finite sums and finite products. Both expressions converge to 1/3 as N grows, the lower sums from below and the upper sums from above, and the gap 1/N is what Archimedes' property drives to 0.

The arithmetic rests on one closed form, valid for every n∈N:

6∑k<nι(k)2  =  ι(n)(ι(n)−1)(2ι(n)−1),

which at n=0 reads 0=0 and is the familiar n(n−1)(2n−1)/6 written so that the empty sum is the case n=0 rather than an exception. Note the indexing: the sum runs over k<n, so its last term is ι(n−1)2 and not ι(n)2.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: f:[0,1]→R with f(x)=x2, and for N≥1 the uniform partition UN=(N,t) of [0,1] with ti=ι(i)/ι(N) for i≤N and lengths Δi=1/ι(N).

[L2]

mi=inf⁡f[Ii], Mi=sup⁡f[Ii], L(f,P)=∑i<NmiΔi, U(f,P)=∑i<NMiΔi, and L(f,P)≤∫01‾f≤∫01‾f≤U(f,P) for every partition P; when f is integrable, ∫01f is the common value of the two integrals (For bounded f on [a,b] and a partition P: the infimum mi and supremum Mi of f on the i-th subinterval, and the lower and upper Darboux sums L(f,P)=∑imiΔi and U(f,P)=∑iMiΔi, The lower and upper Darboux integrals of a bounded f on [a,b] as sup⁡PL(f,P) and inf⁡PU(f,P), Darboux integrability as their equality, and the notation ∫abf).

[L3]

For 0≤a<b one has a2<b2; a set with a least element has it as its infimum and one with a greatest element has it as its supremum (Monotonicity of x↦xn and of n↦an, Integer powers am, Greatest lower bound (infimum), Maximum and minimum of a set, Complete ordered field (least-upper-bound property)).

[L4]

The closed form. For every n∈N, 6∑k<nι(k)2=ι(n)(ι(n)−1)(2ι(n)−1). This is an induction on n (The principle of mathematical induction) from the recursion clause ∑k<n+1=∑k<n+ι(n)2 of Finite sums and finite products, by recursion and the identity x(x−1)(2x−1)+6x2=x(x+1)(2x+1), valid in any commutative ring and in particular for x=ι(n) (Ordered field, Canonical naturals are positive and strictly increasing).

[L5]

Finite sums: scaling, additivity, telescoping ∑i<N(ci+1−ci)=cN−c0, and ι(i+1)=ι(i)+1 (Finite sums and finite products, by recursion, Laws of finite sums and finite products, The canonical natural ι(n)=n⋅1F of a field, Canonical naturals are positive and strictly increasing).

[L8]

Ordered-field arithmetic and the absolute value: adding a constant and multiplying by a positive quantity preserve an inequality; the order is total and transitive; ∣u−v∣≤w whenever c≤u≤d, c≤v≤d and d−c≤w (Basic properties of the absolute value, Order is preserved by adding a constant and by adding inequalities, Sign rules for products and monotonicity of multiplication, Ordered field, Complete ordered field (least-upper-bound property)). These order-arithmetic facts are stated by their sources for the strict order only; the nonstrict forms used below follow by adjoining the equality case, in which the two sides coincide.

Verification

technique · direct
1.1

f is continuous on [0,1] and 0<1, so f is Riemann integrable on [0,1] by [L6]; write J:=∫01f.

givenL6
1.2

On Ii=[ti,ti+1] with 0≤ti<ti+1 the function f takes its least value at ti and its greatest at ti+1, by [L3]; both values are attained, so mi=ti2=ι(i)2/ι(N)2 and Mi=ti+12=ι(i+1)2/ι(N)2 by [L3] and [L1].

givenL1L3
2.1

By [L2], [L5] and [L1], L(f,UN)=∑i<Nι(i)2ι(N)2⋅1ι(N)=1ι(N)3∑i<Nι(i)2, and by [L4] this equals ι(N)(ι(N)−1)(2ι(N)−1)6 ι(N)3=(ι(N)−1)(2ι(N)−1)6 ι(N)2.

step 1.2L1L2L4L5
2.2

Likewise U(f,UN)=1ι(N)3∑i<Nι(i+1)2. Since ∑i<Nι(i+1)2=∑k<N+1ι(k)2−ι(0)2=∑k<N+1ι(k)2 by [L5] and ι(0)=0, [L4] applied at N+1 gives U(f,UN)=(ι(N)+1)(2ι(N)+1)6 ι(N)2.

step 1.2L1L2L4L5
2.3

Directly, U(f,UN)−L(f,UN)=1ι(N)3∑i<N(ι(i+1)2−ι(i)2)=ι(N)2−ι(0)2ι(N)3=1ι(N), by telescoping in [L5].

step 1.2L1L2L5
3.1

Expanding by [L8], 13−L(f,UN)=3ι(N)−16 ι(N)2>0 and U(f,UN)−13=3ι(N)+16 ι(N)2>0 for N≥1, so L(f,UN)<13<U(f,UN).

step 2.1step 2.2L7L8
3.2

By [L2], L(f,UN)≤J≤U(f,UN) as well.

step 1.1step 2.1step 2.2L2
4.1

Both J and 1/3 lie in the interval with endpoints L(f,UN) and U(f,UN), whose length is 1/ι(N) by step 2.3, so ∣J−1/3∣≤1/ι(N) for every natural N≥1, by [L8].

step 2.3step 3.1step 3.2L8
5.1

If J≠1/3 then ∣J−1/3∣>0, and [L7] supplies N≥1 with 1/ι(N)<∣J−1/3∣, contradicting step 4.1. Hence J=1/3, that is ∫01x2 dx=1/3.

step 4.1L7L8∎

Remarks

  • The first index is 0 and the last term of the lower sum is not 1. The lower sum uses mi=ti2 with i running from 0, so its first term is 0 and its last is ((N−1)/N)2⋅(1/N); the upper sum uses Mi=ti+12 and so ends at 1⋅(1/N). Reading the closed form with the other convention, ∑k=1nk2=n(n+1)(2n+1)/6, and attaching it to the wrong sum is the standard way to lose the factor and land on 1/2 or 1/6 instead of 1/3.

  • The gap is exactly 1/N, not merely O(1/N). Step 2.3 computes it by telescoping without evaluating either sum, which is also the cheapest route to integrability through Riemann's criterion: a bounded f on [a,b] is Darboux integrable if and only if for every real ε>0 there is a partition P with U(f,P)−L(f,P)<ε: the continuity of x2 is not needed for that, only for the shortcut taken in step 1.1.

  • What this example does not do. No antiderivative and no fundamental theorem of calculus is used or available at this point in the reading order; the value 1/3 is extracted from the two sums and the Archimedean property alone. The same computation with x3 needs ∑k<nk3 and is no harder, but it is not carried out here.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

69 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources