Alphabeta Math
CounterexampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-generatedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passjudge pass (z-ai/glm-5.2)audited 2026-07-26
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced — the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted — a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated — a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

[0,1)[0,1) is neither open nor closed in R\mathbb{R}

Statement refuted

Refuted claim: every subset of R\mathbb{R} is open or closed (FALSE: every subset of R\mathbb{R} is either open or closed, Open subset of R\mathbb{R} (every point has a neighbourhood inside it), closed subset (complement open), and clopen).

The witness is the half-open interval E:=[0,1)E := [0,1) (Intervals of R\mathbb{R}: the nine order-convex forms, nondegeneracy, and length). It fails openness at its left endpoint 00, which belongs to EE while every neighbourhood of 00 reaches below 00, and it fails closedness at 11, which does not belong to EE while every neighbourhood of 11 reaches into EE. The refutation is carried out in full in FALSE: every subset of R\mathbb{R} is either open or closed and is recorded here as the named counterexample.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The interval E:=[0,1)={xR:0x<1}E := [0,1) = \{\, x \in \mathbb{R} : 0 \le x < 1 \,\} (Intervals of R\mathbb{R}: the nine order-convex forms, nondegeneracy, and length).

[A1]

The refuted claim: every subset of R\mathbb{R} is open or closed.

[L2]

UU is open when every xUx \in U admits ε>0\varepsilon > 0 with Nε(x)UN_\varepsilon(x) \subseteq U; FF is closed when RF\mathbb{R} \setminus F is open; Nε(x)={y:yx<ε}N_\varepsilon(x) = \{\, y : |y-x| < \varepsilon \,\} (Open subset of R\mathbb{R} (every point has a neighbourhood inside it), closed subset (complement open), and clopen, The ε\varepsilon-neighbourhood and the punctured ε\varepsilon-neighbourhood of a point of R\mathbb{R}).

[L3]

Every nonempty finite set of reals has a minimum, which is one of its members (Every nonempty finite set of reals has a maximum and a minimum, Maximum and minimum of a set).

[L4]

Absolute value: z=z|z| = z for z0z \ge 0 and z=z|z| = -z for z<0z < 0 (Basic properties of the absolute value); 0<10 < 1, so 2:=1+1>02 := 1+1 > 0 and 0<d21<d0 < d \cdot 2^{-1} < d for d>0d > 0; adding a constant preserves an inequality and the order is total (The multiplicative identity is positive, Order is preserved by adding a constant and by adding inequalities, Sign rules for products and monotonicity of multiplication, Ordered field, Complete ordered field (least-upper-bound property)). These order-arithmetic facts are stated by their sources for the strict order only; the nonstrict forms used below follow by adjoining the equality case, in which the two sides coincide.

Counterexample

technique · direct
1.1

0E0 \in E and 1E1 \notin E, so EE is a legitimate instance of the claim [A1] and 1RE1 \in \mathbb{R} \setminus E.

A1L4
1.2

EE is not open: for a real ε>0\varepsilon > 0 the point y:=(ε21)y := -(\varepsilon \cdot 2^{-1}) satisfies y0=ε21<ε|y - 0| = \varepsilon \cdot 2^{-1} < \varepsilon by [L4], so yNε(0)y \in N_\varepsilon(0), while y<0y < 0 puts yy outside EE. Hence no neighbourhood of the point 00 of EE is contained in EE.

L1L2L4
1.3

EE is not closed: for a real ε>0\varepsilon > 0 put t:=min{ε,1}21t := \min\{\varepsilon, 1\} \cdot 2^{-1}, positive by [L3] and [L4], and y:=1ty := 1 - t; then t121t \le 1 \cdot 2^{-1} gives y1121>0y \ge 1 - 1 \cdot 2^{-1} > 0, and t>0t > 0 gives y<1y < 1, so yEy \in E; and y1=tε21<ε|y - 1| = t \le \varepsilon \cdot 2^{-1} < \varepsilon, so yNε(1)y \in N_\varepsilon(1). Hence no neighbourhood of the point 11 of RE\mathbb{R} \setminus E is contained in RE\mathbb{R} \setminus E, so RE\mathbb{R} \setminus E is not open.

L1L2L3L4
2.1

By steps 1.2 and 1.3 the set EE is neither open nor closed, so the claim [A1] fails at EE and is refuted.

step 1.1step 1.2step 1.3A1L1L2

Remarks

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · next 3 levels

Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 29 results over 10 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.

Sources