Alphabeta Math
CounterexampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-generatedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passverified 2026-08-10 (gpt-5.6-terra-codex-subscription)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

x/(1+(k+1)2x2)x/(1+(k+1)^2x^2) converges uniformly to zero on R\mathbb{R} while every derivative at zero equals one

Statement refuted

Refuted claim: if differentiable functions converge uniformly, their derivatives must converge to the derivative of the limit.

For kNk\in\mathbb{N} put ak:=ι(k+1)a_k:=\iota(k+1) and define

fk(x):=x1+ak2x2(xR).f_k(x):=\frac{x}{1+a_k^2x^2}\qquad(x\in\mathbb{R}).

Then fk0f_k\to0 uniformly on R\mathbb{R}, but fk(0)=1f_k'(0)=1 for every kk, whereas the derivative of the zero function is 00.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The functions fkf_k in the Statement, with ak=ι(k+1)>0a_k=\iota(k+1)>0.

[L1]

Every square in an ordered field is nonnegative, with a nonzero square positive; absolute value is multiplicative (Squares of nonzero elements are positive, Basic properties of the absolute value).

[L4]

Uniform convergence requires one index controlling the error at every point (Pointwise convergence, uniform convergence, and the uniformly Cauchy condition for sequences of real-valued functions).

Counterexample

technique · direct
1.1

The denominator 1+ak2x21+a_k^2x^2 is positive for every xx, so fkf_k is differentiable on R\mathbb{R} by [L2].

L1L2
1.2

From (akx1)20(a_k|x|-1)^2\ge0 one obtains 2akx1+ak2x22a_k|x|\le1+a_k^2x^2, hence fk(x)1/(2ak)|f_k(x)|\le1/(2a_k) for every xRx\in\mathbb{R}.

L1algebra
1.3

At x=0x=0, the numerator xx has derivative 11, the denominator 1+ak2x21+a_k^2x^2 has value 11 and derivative 00, so the quotient rule gives fk(0)=1f_k'(0)=1.

L2algebra
1.4

The zero function has derivative 00 by the constant case of the power rule.

L2
2.1

Given ε>0\varepsilon>0, [L3] gives NN such that 1/(2ak)<ε1/(2a_k)<\varepsilon for every kNk\ge N; step 1.2 then gives fk(x)<ε|f_k(x)|<\varepsilon for every xRx\in\mathbb{R}.

step 1.2L3choose
3.1

Step 2.1 proves fk0f_k\to0 uniformly, while steps 1.3 and 1.4 show that the derivatives at 00 do not converge to the derivative of the limit.

step 2.1step 1.3step 1.4L4
4.1

The uniformly convergent differentiable sequence therefore refutes the claim.

step 3.1

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · next 3 levels

Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 80 results over 18 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.

Sources