Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-09-05
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The Cantor function has derivative 0 almost everywhere, is not differentiable on the Cantor set, and still rises from 0 to 1

Example

The Cantor function c:[0,1][0,1] is nondecreasing, satisfies c(0)=0 and c(1)=1, has derivative 0 almost everywhere, and has no finite derivative at any point of the Cantor set.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Cantor function c and the Cantor set C.

[A1]

The symbols are those of the statement.

Verification

technique · direct
1.1

By The Cantor function is well defined, satisfies c(x)c(y) whenever xy, is surjective onto [0,1], and is constant on every interval removed from the Cantor set, every point of [0,1]C lies in an open interval on which c is constant. Hence c(x)=0 for all xC. Since C is Lebesgue null by The Cantor set is an uncountable subset of R of Lebesgue measure zero, this proves c=0 almost everywhere.

given
2.1

Fix xC. Write the ternary expansion of x using only digits 0 and 2, and let unxvn be the two points of C obtained by freezing the first n ternary digits of x and filling the remaining digits with all 0's and all 2's. Then vnun=3n and c(vn)c(un)=2n by the digit description of The Cantor set is exactly the set of k1ak3k with every ak{0,2}, and this gives a bijection with {0,1}N and the definition of the Cantor function. At least one of the two numerator differences c(vn)c(x) and c(x)c(un) is at least 2n1. For that choice, the corresponding denominator is positive and at most vnun=3n, so one of the two secant slopes is at least 2n1/3n=12(3/2)n. These lower bounds are unbounded, so c cannot have a finite derivative at x.

step 1.1algebra
3.1

Steps 1.1, 2.1, and 2.2 prove the example.

step 1.1step 2.1step 2.2

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

53 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources