Alphabeta Math
CounterexampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-03
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

An invertible derivative at one point does not give a local inverse without C1 regularity

Example

Define

f(x):={x+2x2sin⁡(1/x),x≠0,0,x=0.

Then f is differentiable at 0 with f′(0)=1, but it is injective on no neighbourhood of 0. Its derivative is not continuous at 0, so this does not contradict the C1 inverse function theorem.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: No hypotheses beyond those quantified in the statement.

[L2]

Sine and cosine have the integer-multiple values determined by their zero sets, periods, and quarter-turn values (The zero sets of sine and cosine and the least positive common period 2 pi, Quarter-turn values and shifts by pi/2 and pi).

[L4]

Sine is bounded by 1 in absolute value (Signs, monotonicity intervals, and ranges of sine and cosine).

Proof

technique · contradiction
1.1

At zero, f(h)−f(0)h=1+2hsin⁡(1/h)⟶1, because sine is bounded. Thus f′(0)=1. For x≠0, [L1] gives f′(x)=1+4xsin⁡(1/x)−2cos⁡(1/x).

L1L4L5algebra
2.1

For n≥1, put xn:=1/(2πn) and yn:=1/((2n+1)π). Both sequences tend to zero; [L2] gives sin⁡(1/xn)=sin⁡(1/yn)=0, cos⁡(1/xn)=1, and cos⁡(1/yn)=−1. Thus step 1.1 gives f′(xn)=−1 and f′(yn)=3, so f′ is not continuous at zero.

step 1.1L2
3.1

Suppose f were injective on an open interval about zero. It is continuous there because it is differentiable, so [L3] would make it strictly increasing or strictly decreasing. At every differentiability point an increasing function has nonnegative derivative, while a decreasing function has nonpositive derivative, directly from the signs of its difference quotients. Step 2.1 supplies both a negative and a positive derivative in every such interval, a contradiction.

assume-contrastep 2.1L3L5
4.1

Thus no neighbourhood gives injectivity; step 2.1 also identifies the failure of the C1 hypothesis.

step 2.1step 3.1L4discharge-contradiction∎

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

47 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources