Alphabeta Math
Session-authored (Fable 5 assisted)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

3 results · all verified · 0 also independently AI-judged
Every result on this page is machine-checked by a proof checker and read in full and owner-audited; the judge is an additional, independent cross-model AI review of the proofs. The 3 not AI-judged were verified by owner audit (typically over a confirmed judge false positive), not failures.

The Inverse and Implicit Function Theorems: Examples and Counterexamples

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs

None yet.

5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements

ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-03Open item page →

The unit circle is locally a C1 graph at every point

Example

At every point (a,b) of the unit circle a2+b2=1, the circle is locally the graph of a C1 function of one coordinate.

Facts & Assumptions

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Let F(x,y):=x2+y21. Then [L2] gives DF(x,y)(u,v)=2xu+2yv. At a point (a,b) on the circle, at least one of a,b is nonzero.

L2givenalgebra
2.1

If b0, then DyF(a,b) is multiplication by 2b and is invertible, so [L1] expresses the circle locally as y=φ(x). If a0, exchange the coordinate blocks and obtain x=ψ(y). These alternatives cover every circle point by step 1.1.

step 1.1L1cases
CounterexampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-03Open item page →

The real complex-squaring map is locally but not globally invertible off the origin

Example

For

S(x,y):=(x2y2,2xy),

DS(x,y) is invertible exactly when (x,y)(0,0), so S is locally invertible off the origin. Nevertheless S(x,y)=S(x,y), and every nonzero target in R2 has exactly two preimages. Thus the inverse function theorem is irreducibly local. At the origin the derivative is not invertible, and zero has only one preimage.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: No hypotheses beyond those quantified in the statement.

[L1]

A C1 map on an open Euclidean domain with an invertible derivative has a local C1 inverse (The Euclidean inverse function theorem).

[L2]

Invertibility means the existence of a two-sided linear inverse (Invertible Euclidean linear maps).

[L4]

Direct difference quotients give the two coordinate partial-derivative rows (2x,2y) and (2y,2x); these affine entries are continuous. Thus the continuous-partials theorem gives the displayed total derivative, and S is C1 (If all partial derivatives exist on a neighbourhood and are continuous at a point, then the map is totally differentiable there with Jacobian derivative, Continuously differentiable maps, local inverses, and local diffeomorphisms).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

The total derivative is DS(x,y)(u,v)=(2xu2yv,2yu+2xv). The domain R2 is open by [L5], and [L4] makes S C1. If r2:=x2+y2>0, its inverse is (p,q)(xp+yq2r2,yp+xq2r2). Direct substitution verifies both inverse identities, so [L1] gives local invertibility at every nonzero point. At (0,0) the derivative is the zero map; moreover every ball about the origin contains distinct (t,0) and (t,0) with the same image, so no local inverse exists there.

L1L2L4L5algebra
1.2

If S(x,y)=(u,v), then (x2+y2)2=u2+v2. For (u,v)(0,0), [L3] therefore fixes the positive value r:=x2+y2=u2+v2, and x2=r+u2,y2=ru2,2xy=v. The square equations and the sign condition 2xy=v leave exactly one pair (x,y) up to simultaneous negation. Thus there are exactly two preimages.

L3algebra
2.1

For the zero target, the identity in step 1.2 forces x2+y2=0, hence (x,y)=(0,0).

step 1.2L3algebra
3.1

Steps 1.1--2.1 establish every local, global, and origin qualification in the example.

step 1.1step 1.2step 2.1
CounterexampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-03Open item page →

An invertible derivative at one point does not give a local inverse without C1 regularity

Example

Define

f(x):={x+2x2sin(1/x),x0,0,x=0.

Then f is differentiable at 0 with f(0)=1, but it is injective on no neighbourhood of 0. Its derivative is not continuous at 0, so this does not contradict the C1 inverse function theorem.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: No hypotheses beyond those quantified in the statement.

[L2]

Sine and cosine have the integer-multiple values determined by their zero sets, periods, and quarter-turn values (The zero sets of sine and cosine and the least positive common period 2 pi, Quarter-turn values and shifts by pi/2 and pi).

[L4]

Sine is bounded by 1 in absolute value (Signs, monotonicity intervals, and ranges of sine and cosine).

Proof

technique · contradiction
1.1

At zero, f(h)f(0)h=1+2hsin(1/h)1, because sine is bounded. Thus f(0)=1. For x0, [L1] gives f(x)=1+4xsin(1/x)2cos(1/x).

L1L4L5algebra
2.1

For n1, put xn:=1/(2πn) and yn:=1/((2n+1)π). Both sequences tend to zero; [L2] gives sin(1/xn)=sin(1/yn)=0, cos(1/xn)=1, and cos(1/yn)=1. Thus step 1.1 gives f(xn)=1 and f(yn)=3, so f is not continuous at zero.

step 1.1L2
3.1

Suppose f were injective on an open interval about zero. It is continuous there because it is differentiable, so [L3] would make it strictly increasing or strictly decreasing. At every differentiability point an increasing function has nonnegative derivative, while a decreasing function has nonpositive derivative, directly from the signs of its difference quotients. Step 2.1 supplies both a negative and a positive derivative in every such interval, a contradiction.

assume-contrastep 2.1L3L5
4.1

Thus no neighbourhood gives injectivity; step 2.1 also identifies the failure of the C1 hypothesis.

step 2.1step 3.1L4discharge-contradiction

Sources