How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A nonlinear reparametrisation leaves a Stieltjes integral unchanged
Example
For on , the change-of-variable theorem gives the concrete identity
Facts & Assumptions
Given: , , and on .
Increasing continuous reparametrization preserves a Stieltjes integral (Change of variable for the Riemann–Stieltjes integral).
The identity integrator gives the ordinary Riemann integral (The identity integrator recovers the Riemann integral).
A integrator reduces the integral to one against its derivative (A continuously differentiable integrator reduces Stieltjes integration to ordinary integration).
Verification
The map is a strictly increasing continuous bijection of onto itself. Applying [L1] gives .
Direct difference quotients give and . Hence [L2], [L3], and the FTC give [L2, L3] ∎
Depends on
- Change of variable for the Riemann–Stieltjes integral
- A continuously differentiable integrator reduces Stieltjes integration to ordinary integration
- The identity integrator recovers the Riemann integral
- The derivative $f'(c) = \lim_{x \to c} \frac{f(x) - f(c)}{x - c}$ of $f : A \to \mathbb{R}$ at a point $c \in A$ that is a limit point of $A$, and differentiability on a set
- The second fundamental theorem: if $G$ is differentiable on $[a,b]$ with $G' = f$ and $f$ is integrable, then $\int_a^b f = G(b)-G(a)$
- Integer powers $a^m$
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 111 results over 17 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- W. Rudin, Principles of Mathematical Analysis, Ch. 6, Theorem 6.19 (standard reference, not scraped)