Alphabeta Math
CounterexampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passverified 2026-08-09 (gpt-5.6-terra-codex-subscription)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The identity is uniformly continuous on R\mathbb{R} and its square is not, so uniform continuity is not preserved by products

Statement refuted

Refuted claim: if f,g:ARf, g : A \to \mathbb{R} are uniformly continuous on ARA \subseteq \mathbb{R} (Uniform continuity of f:ARf : A \to \mathbb{R}: one δ\delta serving every pair of points of AA) then so is their pointwise product fgfg.

The witness is the simplest possible one: A:=RA := \mathbb{R} and f=g=idf = g = \mathrm{id}, the identity. The identity is uniformly continuous on R\mathbb{R} — one may take δ:=ε\delta := \varepsilon — and its product with itself is xx2x \mapsto x^{2}, which is not uniformly continuous on R\mathbb{R} (xx2x \mapsto x^2 is continuous on R\mathbb{R} and not uniformly continuous, the pairs k+1k+1 and k+1+1/(k+1)k+1+1/(k+1) defeating every δ\delta).

The contrast with continuity is the point. Products do preserve continuity, with no hypothesis at all (Sums, scalar multiples, products, absolute values, maxima, minima and quotients with nonvanishing denominator of continuous functions are continuous, as are constants, the identity and every polynomial function). The reason the proof there does not transfer is visible in the estimate: bounding f(x)g(x)f(x)g(x)|f(x)g(x) - f(x')g(x')| requires a bound on the values of ff and gg near the two points, and for continuity that bound is local, supplied afresh at each point, whereas uniform continuity would need one bound valid on the whole domain. On an unbounded domain no such bound need exist.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The domain A:=RA := \mathbb{R}, the identity id:RR\mathrm{id} : \mathbb{R} \to \mathbb{R}, id(x)=x\mathrm{id}(x) = x, and its square xx2x \mapsto x^{2} (Integer powers ama^m).

[L1]

Uniform continuity on AA: for every real ε>0\varepsilon > 0 there is a real δ>0\delta > 0 such that all x,xAx, x' \in A with xx<δ|x - x'| < \delta satisfy h(x)h(x)<ε|h(x) - h(x')| < \varepsilon (Uniform continuity of f:ARf : A \to \mathbb{R}: one δ\delta serving every pair of points of AA).

[L3]

The pointwise product of id\mathrm{id} with itself is xxx=x2x \mapsto x \cdot x = x^{2}, and products of continuous functions are continuous (Sums, scalar multiples, products, absolute values, maxima, minima and quotients with nonvanishing denominator of continuous functions are continuous, as are constants, the identity and every polynomial function, Integer powers ama^m).

[L4]

Absolute value and order: u0|u| \ge 0 and u=0|u| = 0 exactly when u=0u = 0; the order is total (Basic properties of the absolute value, Ordered field).

Counterexample

technique · direct
1.1

The identity is uniformly continuous on R\mathbb{R}: given a real ε>0\varepsilon > 0, take δ:=ε\delta := \varepsilon; then all x,xRx, x' \in \mathbb{R} with xx<δ|x - x'| < \delta satisfy id(x)id(x)=xx<ε|\mathrm{id}(x) - \mathrm{id}(x')| = |x - x'| < \varepsilon.

L1L4
1.2

The pointwise product of the identity with itself is the function xx2x \mapsto x^{2}.

L3
1.3

By [L2] the function xx2x \mapsto x^{2} is not uniformly continuous on R\mathbb{R}.

L2
2.1

So f:=idf := \mathrm{id} and g:=idg := \mathrm{id} are uniformly continuous on A=RA = \mathbb{R} while fgfg is not: the refuted claim is false.

step 1.1step 1.2step 1.3L1

Remarks

  • Where the implication survives. On a bounded domain the product of two uniformly continuous functions is uniformly continuous, because each factor is then bounded: a uniformly continuous function on a bounded set is bounded, and the estimate fgfgfgg+gff|fg - f'g'| \le |f|\,|g - g'| + |g'|\,|f - f'| closes. Nothing on this page asserts that, and it is not used anywhere here; the witness above shows only that the unrestricted claim fails.

  • Sums and scalar multiples are safe. If ff and gg are uniformly continuous on AA then so are f+gf + g and αf\alpha f, by the same ε/2\varepsilon/2 and ε/α\varepsilon/|\alpha| arguments that work for continuity, with the δ\delta's inherited uniformly. It is only the product, and the quotient, that need a bound on values.

  • A second witness on a bounded domain. x1/xx \mapsto 1/x is not uniformly continuous on (0,1)(0,1) (x1/xx \mapsto 1/x is continuous on (0,1)(0,1) and not uniformly continuous there, the pairs 1/(k+2)1/(k+2) and 1/(k+3)1/(k+3) defeating every δ\delta) although the identity is; that failure is a quotient rather than a product, and it shows that boundedness of the domain does not rescue every algebraic operation.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · next 3 levels

Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 78 results over 18 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.

Sources