Alphabeta Math
CorollaryStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passjudge pass (z-ai/glm-5.2)audited 2026-07-27
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Every subspace of a metrizable space is metrizable and every subspace of a first countable space is first countable, the metric case being the subspace metric already identified with the subspace topology

Statement

Both of the following properties of topological spaces are hereditary (Hereditary, open-hereditary and closed-hereditary properties of topological spaces).

  1. Metrizability (Metrizable space: a topological space whose topology is induced by some metric; metrizability is topological, the metric is not). If T\mathcal{T} is induced by a metric dd on XX and SXS \subseteq X, then the subspace topology TS\mathcal{T}_S (Subspace topology: the traces of the open sets, its closed sets and its bases, the continuity of the inclusion, and the characteristic property of a map into a subspace) is induced by the subspace metric dS=d(S×S)d_S = d \restriction (S \times S) (Isometry, isometric embedding, and the subspace metric on a subset). So a subspace of a metrizable space is metrizable, and a metric inducing its topology is available explicitly and not merely asserted to exist.
  2. First countability (First countable space: a countable neighbourhood base at every point). If every point of XX has an at most countable neighbourhood base and SXS \subseteq X, then every point of SS has an at most countable neighbourhood base in (S,TS)(S, \mathcal{T}_S), namely the family of traces on SS of the members of a base at that point in XX.

Claim 1 is a corollary in the strict sense: the identification of the subspace topology with the metric topology of the subspace metric is discharged inside Metrizable space: a topological space whose topology is induced by some metric; metrizability is topological, the metric is not, and nothing is reproved here.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A topological space (X,T)(X, \mathcal{T}), a subset SXS \subseteq X with the subspace topology TS={US:UT}\mathcal{T}_S = \{\, U \cap S : U \in \mathcal{T} \,\}, and a point xSx \in S.

[A2]

NN is a neighbourhood of xx in a space when some open set UU of that space satisfies xUNx \in U \subseteq N; a family Bx\mathcal{B}_x of neighbourhoods of xx is a neighbourhood base at xx when every neighbourhood of xx contains a member of it (Neighbourhood of a point and neighbourhood base, with this library's convention that a neighbourhood need not be open).

[A3]

A space is first countable when every one of its points has an at most countable neighbourhood base (First countable space: a countable neighbourhood base at every point, Finite, countably infinite, countable, uncountable).

[L1]

For AXA \subseteq X and a metric dd on XX, the subspace topology {UA:UTd}\{\, U \cap A : U \in \mathcal{T}_d \,\} is exactly the metric topology of the subspace metric dAd_A (Metrizable space: a topological space whose topology is induced by some metric; metrizability is topological, the metric is not, subspaces bullet; Isometry, isometric embedding, and the subspace metric on a subset).

[L3]

A nonempty set is at most countable if and only if it admits a surjection from N\mathbb{N} (A nonempty set is at most countable iff it is a surjective image of N\mathbb{N}, Finite, countably infinite, countable, uncountable).

[L4]

A property PP is hereditary when every subspace of every space satisfying PP satisfies PP (Hereditary, open-hereditary and closed-hereditary properties of topological spaces).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Let XX be metrizable and let dd be a metric on XX with Td=T\mathcal{T}_d = \mathcal{T}; such a dd exists by [A1].

A1choose
1.2

Let XX be first countable and let Bx\mathcal{B}_x be an at most countable neighbourhood base at xx in XX; such a family exists by [A3].

A3choose
2.1

Bx\mathcal{B}_x is nonempty, since XX itself is a neighbourhood of xx and so contains a member of Bx\mathcal{B}_x.

A2step 1.2
2.2

By [L1] applied with A:=SA := S, the family {US:UTd}\{\, U \cap S : U \in \mathcal{T}_d \,\} is the metric topology of dSd_S; and Td=T\mathcal{T}_d = \mathcal{T} by step 1.1, so that family is TS\mathcal{T}_S by [L2].

step 1.1L1L2
2.3

Put BxS:={NS:NBx}\mathcal{B}^S_x := \{\, N \cap S : N \in \mathcal{B}_x \,\}. Each of its members is a neighbourhood of xx in SS: given NBxN \in \mathcal{B}_x there is UTU \in \mathcal{T} with xUNx \in U \subseteq N, and then USTSU \cap S \in \mathcal{T}_S with xUSNSx \in U \cap S \subseteq N \cap S.

step 1.2A2L2
2.4

Every neighbourhood MM of xx in SS contains a member of BxS\mathcal{B}^S_x: fix WTSW \in \mathcal{T}_S with xWMx \in W \subseteq M and write W=USW = U \cap S with UTU \in \mathcal{T} by [L2]; then UU is a neighbourhood of xx in XX, so some NBxN \in \mathcal{B}_x satisfies NUN \subseteq U, and NSUS=WMN \cap S \subseteq U \cap S = W \subseteq M.

step 1.2A2L2
3.1

BxS\mathcal{B}^S_x is nonempty and at most countable: by step 2.1 and [L3] there is a surjection s:NBxs : \mathbb{N} \to \mathcal{B}_x, and ks(k)Sk \mapsto s(k) \cap S is then a surjection NBxS\mathbb{N} \to \mathcal{B}^S_x, so [L3] applies again.

step 2.1L3
3.2

By step 2.2 the topology TS\mathcal{T}_S is the metric topology of the metric dSd_S on SS, so (S,TS)(S,\mathcal{T}_S) is metrizable by [A1]; as XX and SS were arbitrary, metrizability is hereditary by [L4]. This is claim 1.

step 2.2A1L4
4.1

By steps 2.3, 2.4 and 3.1 the family BxS\mathcal{B}^S_x is an at most countable neighbourhood base at xx in (S,TS)(S,\mathcal{T}_S), and xSx \in S was arbitrary, so (S,TS)(S,\mathcal{T}_S) is first countable by [A3]; as XX and SS were arbitrary, first countability is hereditary by [L4]. This is claim 2.

step 2.3step 2.4step 3.1A2A3L4

Remarks

  • No choice principle is spent. The metric dSd_S is a restriction, and the neighbourhood base BxS\mathcal{B}^S_x is the image of a given family under an explicit map, so the enumeration of step 3.1 is produced from a given enumeration rather than selected. The only selections in the proof are the single metric of step 1.1 and the single family of step 1.2, each of which exists by hypothesis for the one space under consideration.

  • Neither converse holds, and neither is claimed. A subspace of a non-metrizable space may perfectly well be metrizable, every one-point subspace being so; heredity is a statement in one direction only.

  • The metric is not canonical, and the topology is. Claim 1 produces a metric on SS, the restriction of the one chosen on XX; a different metric on XX inducing the same topology restricts to a different metric on SS inducing the same subspace topology (Metrizable space: a topological space whose topology is induced by some metric; metrizability is topological, the metric is not). What is hereditary is the existence of a metric, which is a property of the topology alone.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · next 3 levels

Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 89 results over 17 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.

Sources