How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced — the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted — a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated — a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The Topology of Euclidean Space — Examples
1 · Prerequisites
- Binary Operations, Monoids, Groups and Subgroups
- Compactness
- Compactness in Metric Spaces
- Completeness, Completion, and Uniform Continuity
- Connectedness
- Construction of the Natural Numbers
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Cauchy Sequences
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Dedekind Cuts
- Continuity, IVT, EVT, and Uniform Continuity
- Countability and Uncountability
- Filters and Ultrafilters
- Finite Counting, Factorials and Binomial Coefficients
- Foundations of the Real Numbers for Analysis
- Limits of Real Functions
- Linear Independence, Bases and Dimension
- Linear Transformations, Rank-Nullity and Quotient Spaces
- Metric Spaces
- Monotone Sequences, Bolzano-Weierstrass, and Cauchy Completeness
- Order, Zorn's Lemma, and the Axiom of Choice
- Relations, Functions, and Quotients
- Rings, Subrings, Integral Domains and Fields
- Rⁿ as a Normed Space; Vector-Valued Functions
- Roots, Rational Powers, and Classical Inequalities
- Sequences and Limits
- Subspaces, Products, and Quotients
- Suprema and Infima
- The Topology of Euclidean Space
- The ZFC Axioms and the Basic Set Constructions
- Topological Spaces and Continuity
- Topology of ℝ
- Vector Spaces, Linear Subspaces, Span and Direct Sums
2 · Summary
3 · Logical flowchart
4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs
None yet.
5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements
The Euclidean closed ball and sphere worked through the compactness equivalence chart
Example
Assume and , let , , and . The closed ball and sphere are compact (For , every Euclidean closed ball and every Euclidean sphere of positive radius is compact). Therefore each is closed and bounded, pseudocompact, countably compact, sequentially compact, limit point compact, and complete and totally bounded; every continuous real-valued function on either set attains both extrema (Assuming and , compactness, sequential compactness, countable compactness, limit point compactness, completeness and total boundedness, pseudocompactness, closedness and boundedness, and the extreme-value property are equivalent for nonempty subsets of with ). The two sets are those of Euclidean spheres and closed balls as subspaces of .
The open unit ball in is bounded and not compact
Statement refuted
Refuted claim: every bounded subset of is compact.
For , the open unit ball is bounded but not compact.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: , the open unit ball , and a standard unit vector .
Every bounded Euclidean subset is compact.
Euclidean compactness is equivalent to closedness and boundedness (For a nonempty subset of with , compactness, closedness and boundedness, pseudocompactness, and attainment of extrema by every continuous real-valued function are equivalent).
The unit vector exists and has Euclidean norm (The standard list with and for is an ordered basis of ; hence , and is the zero space with basis and dimension ).
The open ball consists of the points of Euclidean distance less than from , and metric balls form neighbourhoods in the metric topology (Open ball, closed ball and sphere in a metric space, The metric topology: a set is open when every one of its points has a ball around it inside the set; closed means open complement).
Counterexample
The open unit ball is bounded, since every one of its points has distance less than , hence less than , from .
It is not closed: , while for every the point , with , lies in both and . Thus every neighbourhood of meets the open unit ball.
By [L1], the bounded nonclosed set is not compact. It therefore refutes [A1].
is closed and unbounded and is not compact for
Statement refuted
Refuted claim: every closed subset of is compact.
For , is closed and unbounded, hence it is not compact.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: , Euclidean space , and a standard unit vector .
Every closed Euclidean subset is compact.
Euclidean compactness is equivalent to closedness and boundedness (For a nonempty subset of with , compactness, closedness and boundedness, pseudocompactness, and attainment of extrema by every continuous real-valued function are equivalent).
The standard vector has Euclidean norm (The standard list with and for is an ordered basis of ; hence , and is the zero space with basis and dimension ).
For every real radius there is a natural number larger than it (Every complete ordered field is Archimedean).
The empty set is open, so the whole space is closed; a metric subset is bounded exactly when it lies in some ball about some centre (Topology on a set, open and closed sets, clopen sets, the closed-set axiomatisation, and the coarser/finer comparison, Bounded subset, diameter, distance from a point to a set, and distance between two sets in a metric space).
Counterexample
The whole space is closed, since its complement is empty and the empty set is open.
It is unbounded. Indeed, for an arbitrary centre and radius , choose a natural by [L3]. The reverse triangle inequality gives so is contained in no ball.
By [L1], the closed unbounded space is not compact. Hence it refutes [A1].
The straight segment between two points of an open Euclidean ball stays in the ball
Example
Let , with . The triangle inequality and absolute homogeneity give
So the segment from to stays in the ball. By A finite concatenation of straight segments in is a continuous path it is a polygonal path, and is polygonally connected in the sense of Polygonal paths and polygonally connected subsets of . The norm and ball conventions are those of A norm on a real vector space, the induced metric, and the dictionary with the metric axioms and Open ball, closed ball and sphere in a metric space.
is disconnected, whereas is polygonally connected
Example
The invertible real matrices are the nonzero real numbers, so . This set is disconnected: it contains and but not the intermediate point , so it is not order-convex and cannot be connected by The connected subspaces of with its usual topology are exactly the order-convex subsets, the published characterisation transported by the identification of the two descriptions of "open in ". In contrast, For , the punctured space is polygonally connected gives polygonal connectedness of . Connectedness is understood through Separation of a topological space, connected and disconnected spaces, clopen sets, and connected subsets.
An infinite particular-point space is pseudocompact and not compact
Statement refuted
False claim: every pseudocompact topological space is compact.
Let be an infinite set with a distinguished point , carrying the particular-point topology. Then is pseudocompact and not compact.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: An infinite set , a point , and the particular-point topology, whose nonempty open sets are exactly the subsets containing .
Every pseudocompact topological space is compact.
The particular-point topology is a topology and has exactly the stated open sets (The discrete, indiscrete, cofinite, cocountable, particular-point and Sierpinski topologies).
The usual topology on is Hausdorff, so distinct real numbers have disjoint open neighbourhoods (The absolute value makes a metric space: is a metric, its open balls are the intervals , and it is unbounded, Hausdorff space: distinct points have disjoint open neighbourhoods; every metrizable space is Hausdorff and the indiscrete topology on two points is not).
A continuous map pulls back open sets to open sets, and compactness means that every open cover has a finite subcover (Continuity of a map of topological spaces at a point and globally, Open cover, subcover, and compact topological space; a compact subset is a subspace that is compact in its own right).
A space is pseudocompact exactly when every continuous real-valued map has bounded image (Pseudocompact space: every continuous real-valued function has bounded image).
Counterexample
Let be continuous. If for some , choose disjoint open neighbourhoods of and of by [L2]. Then is open, contains , and does not contain , contradicting [L1].
The family consists of open sets and covers .
Hence every continuous is constant, so its image is bounded. Thus is pseudocompact by [L4].
No finite subfamily covers , because its union contains and only finitely many other points, whereas is infinite. Thus is not compact.
The pseudocompact noncompact space contradicts [A1], refuting the claim.
Sources
Standard references
Recommended treatments; not extraction sources.