Alphabeta Math
Session-authored (Fable 5 assisted)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced — the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted — a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated — a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

3 results · all verified · 3 also independently AI-judged
Every result on this page is machine-checked by a proof checker and read in full and owner-audited; the judge is an additional, independent cross-model AI review of the proofs; all 3 also cleared it.

The Topology of Euclidean Space — Examples

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs

None yet.

5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements

ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedjudge pass (z-ai/glm-5.2)audited 2026-07-31Open item page →

The Euclidean closed ball and sphere worked through the compactness equivalence chart

Example

Assume ACω\mathrm{AC}_\omega and DC\mathrm{DC}, let n1n\ge1, cRnc\in\mathbb R^n, and r>0r>0. The closed ball B2(c,r)\overline B_2(c,r) and sphere S2(c,r)S_2(c,r) are compact (For n1n\ge1, every Euclidean closed ball and every Euclidean sphere of positive radius is compact). Therefore each is closed and bounded, pseudocompact, countably compact, sequentially compact, limit point compact, and complete and totally bounded; every continuous real-valued function on either set attains both extrema (Assuming ACω\mathrm{AC}_\omega and DC\mathrm{DC}, compactness, sequential compactness, countable compactness, limit point compactness, completeness and total boundedness, pseudocompactness, closedness and boundedness, and the extreme-value property are equivalent for nonempty subsets of Rn\mathbb{R}^n with n1n\ge1). The two sets are those of Euclidean spheres and closed balls as subspaces of Rn\mathbb{R}^n.

CounterexampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (z-ai/glm-5.2)audited 2026-07-31Open item page →

The open unit ball in Rn\mathbb{R}^n is bounded and not compact

Statement refuted

Refuted claim: every bounded subset of Rn\mathbb R^n is compact.

For n1n\ge1, the open unit ball B2(0,1)B_2(0,1) is bounded but not compact.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: n1n\ge1, the open unit ball B2(0,1)B_2(0,1), and a standard unit vector e0e_0.

[A1]

Every bounded Euclidean subset is compact.

[L3]

The open ball B2(0,1)B_2(0,1) consists of the points of Euclidean distance less than 11 from 00, and metric balls form neighbourhoods in the metric topology (Open ball, closed ball and sphere in a metric space, The metric topology: a set is open when every one of its points has a ball around it inside the set; closed means open complement).

Counterexample

technique · direct
1.1

The open unit ball is bounded, since every one of its points has distance less than 11, hence less than 22, from 00.

L3
1.2

It is not closed: e0B2(0,1)e_0\notin B_2(0,1), while for every r>0r>0 the point (1ε)e0(1-\varepsilon)e_0, with 0<ε<min(r,1)0<\varepsilon<\min(r,1), lies in both B2(0,1)B_2(0,1) and B2(e0,r)B_2(e_0,r). Thus every neighbourhood of e0e_0 meets the open unit ball.

L2L3
2.1

By [L1], the bounded nonclosed set B2(0,1)B_2(0,1) is not compact. It therefore refutes [A1].

A1L1step 1.1step 1.2
CounterexampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (z-ai/glm-5.2)audited 2026-07-31Open item page →

Rn\mathbb{R}^n is closed and unbounded and is not compact for n1n\ge1

Statement refuted

Refuted claim: every closed subset of Rn\mathbb R^n is compact.

For n1n\ge1, Rn\mathbb R^n is closed and unbounded, hence it is not compact.

Facts & Assumptions

Counterexample

technique · direct
1.1

The whole space Rn\mathbb R^n is closed, since its complement is empty and the empty set is open.

L4
1.2

It is unbounded. Indeed, for an arbitrary centre cRnc\in\mathbb R^n and radius r>0r>0, choose a natural k>r+c2k>r+\lVert c\rVert_2 by [L3]. The reverse triangle inequality gives ke0c2kc2>r,\lVert ke_0-c\rVert_2\ge k-\lVert c\rVert_2>r, so Rn\mathbb R^n is contained in no ball.

L2L3L4choose
2.1

By [L1], the closed unbounded space Rn\mathbb R^n is not compact. Hence it refutes [A1].

A1L1step 1.1step 1.2
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-generatedjudge pass (z-ai/glm-5.2)audited 2026-07-31Open item page →

The straight segment between two points of an open Euclidean ball stays in the ball

Example

Let x,yB2(c,r)Rnx,y\in B_2(c,r)\subseteq\mathbb R^n, with 0t10\le t\le1. The triangle inequality and absolute homogeneity give

(1t)x+tyc2(1t)xc2+tyc2<r.\lVert(1-t)x+ty-c\rVert_2\le(1-t)\lVert x-c\rVert_2+t\lVert y-c\rVert_2<r.

So the segment from xx to yy stays in the ball. By A finite concatenation of straight segments in Rn\mathbb{R}^n is a continuous path it is a polygonal path, and B2(c,r)B_2(c,r) is polygonally connected in the sense of Polygonal paths and polygonally connected subsets of Rn\mathbb{R}^n. The norm and ball conventions are those of A norm on a real vector space, the induced metric, and the dictionary with the metric axioms and Open ball, closed ball and sphere in a metric space.

ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-generatedjudge pass (z-ai/glm-5.2)audited 2026-07-31Open item page →

GL1(R)=R{0}GL_1(\mathbb{R})=\mathbb{R}\setminus\{0\} is disconnected, whereas R2{0}\mathbb{R}^2\setminus\{0\} is polygonally connected

Example

The invertible 1×11\times1 real matrices are the nonzero real numbers, so GL1(R)=R{0}GL_1(\mathbb R)=\mathbb R\setminus\{0\}. This set is disconnected: it contains 1-1 and 11 but not the intermediate point 00, so it is not order-convex and cannot be connected by The connected subspaces of R\mathbb{R} with its usual topology are exactly the order-convex subsets, the published characterisation transported by the identification of the two descriptions of "open in R\mathbb{R}". In contrast, For n2n\ge2, the punctured space Rn{0}\mathbb{R}^n\setminus\{0\} is polygonally connected gives polygonal connectedness of R2{0}\mathbb R^2\setminus\{0\}. Connectedness is understood through Separation of a topological space, connected and disconnected spaces, clopen sets, and connected subsets.

CounterexampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (z-ai/glm-5.2)audited 2026-07-31Open item page →

An infinite particular-point space is pseudocompact and not compact

Statement refuted

False claim: every pseudocompact topological space is compact.

Let XX be an infinite set with a distinguished point pp, carrying the particular-point topology. Then XX is pseudocompact and not compact.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: An infinite set XX, a point pXp\in X, and the particular-point topology, whose nonempty open sets are exactly the subsets containing pp.

[A1]

Every pseudocompact topological space is compact.

[L1]

The particular-point topology is a topology and has exactly the stated open sets (The discrete, indiscrete, cofinite, cocountable, particular-point and Sierpinski topologies).

[L3]

A continuous map pulls back open sets to open sets, and compactness means that every open cover has a finite subcover (Continuity of a map of topological spaces at a point and globally, Open cover, subcover, and compact topological space; a compact subset is a subspace that is compact in its own right).

[L4]

A space is pseudocompact exactly when every continuous real-valued map has bounded image (Pseudocompact space: every continuous real-valued function has bounded image).

Counterexample

technique · contradiction
1.1

Let f:XRf:X\to\mathbb R be continuous. If f(x)f(p)f(x)\ne f(p) for some xx, choose disjoint open neighbourhoods UU of f(x)f(x) and VV of f(p)f(p) by [L2]. Then f1[U]f^{-1}[U] is open, contains xx, and does not contain pp, contradicting [L1].

L1L2L3assume-contra
1.2

The family U:={{p,x}:xX{p}}\mathcal U:=\{\{p,x\}:x\in X\setminus\{p\}\} consists of open sets and covers XX.

L1
2.1

Hence every continuous f:XRf:X\to\mathbb R is constant, so its image is bounded. Thus XX is pseudocompact by [L4].

step 1.1L4
2.2

No finite subfamily covers XX, because its union contains pp and only finitely many other points, whereas X{p}X\setminus\{p\} is infinite. Thus XX is not compact.

L3step 1.2
3.1

The pseudocompact noncompact space XX contradicts [A1], refuting the claim.

A1step 2.1step 2.2discharge-contradiction

Sources