Alphabeta Math
CounterexampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-generatedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passjudge pass (z-ai/glm-5.2)audited 2026-07-31
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

An infinite particular-point space is pseudocompact and not compact

Statement refuted

False claim: every pseudocompact topological space is compact.

Let XX be an infinite set with a distinguished point pp, carrying the particular-point topology. Then XX is pseudocompact and not compact.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: An infinite set XX, a point pXp\in X, and the particular-point topology, whose nonempty open sets are exactly the subsets containing pp.

[A1]

Every pseudocompact topological space is compact.

[L1]

The particular-point topology is a topology and has exactly the stated open sets (The discrete, indiscrete, cofinite, cocountable, particular-point and Sierpinski topologies).

[L3]

A continuous map pulls back open sets to open sets, and compactness means that every open cover has a finite subcover (Continuity of a map of topological spaces at a point and globally, Open cover, subcover, and compact topological space; a compact subset is a subspace that is compact in its own right).

[L4]

A space is pseudocompact exactly when every continuous real-valued map has bounded image (Pseudocompact space: every continuous real-valued function has bounded image).

Counterexample

technique · contradiction
1.1

Let f:XRf:X\to\mathbb R be continuous. If f(x)f(p)f(x)\ne f(p) for some xx, choose disjoint open neighbourhoods UU of f(x)f(x) and VV of f(p)f(p) by [L2]. Then f1[U]f^{-1}[U] is open, contains xx, and does not contain pp, contradicting [L1].

L1L2L3assume-contra
1.2

The family U:={{p,x}:xX{p}}\mathcal U:=\{\{p,x\}:x\in X\setminus\{p\}\} consists of open sets and covers XX.

L1
2.1

Hence every continuous f:XRf:X\to\mathbb R is constant, so its image is bounded. Thus XX is pseudocompact by [L4].

step 1.1L4
2.2

No finite subfamily covers XX, because its union contains pp and only finitely many other points, whereas X{p}X\setminus\{p\} is infinite. Thus XX is not compact.

L3step 1.2
3.1

The pseudocompact noncompact space XX contradicts [A1], refuting the claim.

A1step 2.1step 2.2discharge-contradiction

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · next 3 levels

Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 87 results over 21 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.

Sources