How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
An infinite particular-point space is pseudocompact and not compact
Statement refuted
False claim: every pseudocompact topological space is compact.
Let be an infinite set with a distinguished point , carrying the particular-point topology. Then is pseudocompact and not compact.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: An infinite set , a point , and the particular-point topology, whose nonempty open sets are exactly the subsets containing .
Every pseudocompact topological space is compact.
The particular-point topology is a topology and has exactly the stated open sets (The discrete, indiscrete, cofinite, cocountable, particular-point and Sierpinski topologies).
The usual topology on is Hausdorff, so distinct real numbers have disjoint open neighbourhoods (The absolute value makes a metric space: is a metric, its open balls are the intervals , and it is unbounded, Hausdorff space: distinct points have disjoint open neighbourhoods; every metrizable space is Hausdorff and the indiscrete topology on two points is not).
A continuous map pulls back open sets to open sets, and compactness means that every open cover has a finite subcover (Continuity of a map of topological spaces at a point and globally, Open cover, subcover, and compact topological space; a compact subset is a subspace that is compact in its own right).
A space is pseudocompact exactly when every continuous real-valued map has bounded image (Pseudocompact space: every continuous real-valued function has bounded image).
Counterexample
Let be continuous. If for some , choose disjoint open neighbourhoods of and of by [L2]. Then is open, contains , and does not contain , contradicting [L1].
The family consists of open sets and covers .
Hence every continuous is constant, so its image is bounded. Thus is pseudocompact by [L4].
No finite subfamily covers , because its union contains and only finitely many other points, whereas is infinite. Thus is not compact.
The pseudocompact noncompact space contradicts [A1], refuting the claim.
Depends on
- Pseudocompact space: every continuous real-valued function has bounded image
- The discrete, indiscrete, cofinite, cocountable, particular-point and Sierpinski topologies
- Open cover, subcover, and compact topological space; a compact subset is a subspace that is compact in its own right
- Hausdorff space: distinct points have disjoint open neighbourhoods; every metrizable space is Hausdorff and the indiscrete topology on two points is not
- The absolute value makes $\mathbb{R}$ a metric space: $d(x,y) = |x-y|$ is a metric, its open balls are the intervals $(x-r, x+r)$, and it is unbounded
- Continuity of a map of topological spaces at a point and globally
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 87 results over 21 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Particular point topology (standard reference, not scraped)
- Pseudocompact space (standard reference, not scraped)