How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A finite concatenation of straight segments in is a continuous path
Statement
Let and . The affine pieces joining to define a continuous map . If every piece lies in a subset , the map is a polygonal path (Polygonal paths and polygonally connected subsets of ) in from to .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Vertices and a partition .
A finite family of closed sets covering a space pastes continuous restrictions to a continuous map (Continuity may be checked on any open cover, and on any finite closed cover; composites of continuous maps are continuous, claim 3).
A map whose values lie in a subspace is continuous into that subspace exactly when its composite with the inclusion into the ambient space is continuous (Subspace topology: the traces of the open sets, its closed sets and its bases, the continuity of the inclusion, and the characteristic property of a map into a subspace).
A map into is continuous if and only if all of its coordinate functions are continuous (A vector-valued function has a limit, or is continuous, if and only if each of its components does; with the algebra of continuous vector-valued functions, clause 1).
Proof
On define . Each coordinate is an affine real function of , hence continuous.
At every shared endpoint , the adjacent formulas both give , so the pieces define one function .
Each interval is closed in , the finitely many intervals cover it, and each restriction of is continuous by step 1.1. Thus is continuous by [L1].
If the pieces lie in , then takes values in . Its composite with the inclusion is the continuous map of step 3.1, so [L2] makes it continuous into the subspace . Its endpoints are , hence it is a path in .
Depends on
- Polygonal paths and polygonally connected subsets of $\mathbb{R}^n$
- Continuity may be checked on any open cover, and on any finite closed cover; composites of continuous maps are continuous
- A vector-valued function has a limit, or is continuous, if and only if each of its components does; with the algebra of continuous vector-valued functions
- Subspace topology: the traces of the open sets, its closed sets and its bases, the continuity of the inclusion, and the characteristic property of a map into a subspace
Used by
- Every connected component of an open subset of ℝⁿ is open and polygonally connected Corollary
- For n≥2, the sphere Sⁿ⁻¹ is path-connected and connected Corollary
- ℝⁿ is polygonally connected, connected, locally path-connected and locally connected Corollary
- The straight segment between two points of an open Euclidean ball stays in the ball Example
- For n≥2, the punctured space ℝⁿ∖{0} is polygonally connected Lemma
- The points polygonally reachable from a fixed point form a clopen subset of every open subset of ℝⁿ Lemma
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 127 results over 20 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Path-connected space (standard reference, not scraped)
- Pasting lemma (Wikipedia) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Polygonal chain (standard reference, not scraped)