Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passverified 2026-08-02 (claude-opus-5)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A point lies in the closure of A iff some sequence in A converges to it, and a set is closed iff it is sequentially closed

Statement

Let (X,d) be a metric space (Metric space: d(x,y)=0 iff x=y, symmetry, and the triangle inequality; pseudometric and ultrametric), let A⊆X, let x∈X and let F⊆X. Call F sequentially closed when every sequence in F that converges in X has its limit in F. Then:

  1. x∈A‾ (Interior, closure, boundary, limit point, isolated point and dense subset of a metric space) if and only if there is a sequence (ak) with ak∈A for every k and ak→x in (X,d) (Convergence of a sequence in a metric space: xk→x iff d(xk,x)→0 in R).
  2. F is closed (The metric topology: a set is open when every one of its points has a ball around it inside the set; closed means open complement) if and only if F is sequentially closed.

The Axiom of Countable Choice is used, once. The direction of claim 1 that manufactures a sequence out of adherence makes one choice per natural number, and that is exactly ACω (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)). The converse direction, and the direction of claim 2 that goes from closed to sequentially closed, are choice free. This is flagged at the step that spends it.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A metric space (X,d), a subset A⊆X, a point x∈X, and a subset F⊆X; for n∈N write An:=B(x,1/(n+1))∩A.

[A2]

Convergence in (X,d): ak→x means that for every rational ε>0 there is K with d(ak,x)<ε for all k≥K, and it is enough to produce such a K for every REAL ε>0, since below any positive real lies a positive rational (Convergence of a sequence in a metric space: xk→x iff d(xk,x)→0 in R, Limits and Cauchy sequences of reals, The rationals embed densely in the reals, Nonnegativity of a metric is a consequence of the other axioms, not an axiom); and d(u,v)=d(v,u) for all u,v∈X, which is the symmetry axiom (M2) (Metric space: d(x,y)=0 iff x=y, symmetry, and the triangle inequality; pseudometric and ultrametric).

[L1]

The balls B(x,1/n), n≥1, are open, contain x, and form a neighbourhood base at x: every open U∋x contains one of them (The balls B(x,1/n), n≥1, form a countable neighbourhood base at x, so every metric space is first countable).

[L3]

Canonical naturals and reciprocals: for naturals 1≤m≤p one has 0<m⋅1R≤p⋅1R and hence 0<1/p≤1/m (Canonical naturals are positive and strictly increasing, Inverses of positives are positive, and reciprocation reverses order); and N contains 0, so n+1≥1 for every n∈N (The natural numbers N (von Neumann)).

[L4]

Countable choice: for a family (An)n∈N of nonempty sets there is a function n↦an with an∈An for every n (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)).

[L5]

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Suppose (ak) is a sequence with ak∈A for every k and ak→x, and let r>0 be an arbitrary real; then there is K with d(ak,x)<r for all k≥K, so d(x,aK)=d(aK,x)<r by the symmetry axiom (M2) of [A2] and hence aK∈B(x,r)∩A, and since r was arbitrary x∈A‾.

A1A2
1.2

Suppose x∈A‾; then for every n∈N the radius 1/(n+1) is a positive real and An=B(x,1/(n+1))∩A is nonempty, so countable choice supplies a sequence (an) with an∈An⊆A for every n.

A1L3L4choose
2.1

That sequence converges to x: given a real ε>0, the ball B(x,ε) is open and contains x, so there is a natural N≥1 with B(x,1/N)⊆B(x,ε); for every n≥N we have n+1≥N, hence 1/(n+1)≤1/N and an∈B(x,1/(n+1))⊆B(x,1/N)⊆B(x,ε), that is d(x,an)<ε.

step 1.2A2L1L2L3
2.2

If F is closed and (ak) is a sequence in F converging to some x∈X, then x∈F‾ by step 1.1 applied with A=F, and F‾=F because F is closed; so x∈F and F is sequentially closed.

step 1.1L5
3.1

Claim 1 holds: step 1.1 gives the implication from a convergent sequence in A to adherence, and steps 1.2 and 2.1 give the converse by producing such a sequence.

step 1.1step 1.2step 2.1
4.1

If F is sequentially closed, let x∈F‾; by claim 1 there is a sequence in F converging to x, so x∈F, whence F‾⊆F; the reverse inclusion always holds, so F=F‾ and F is closed.

step 3.1L5
5.1

Claim 2 holds by steps 2.2 and 4.1, and claim 1 by step 3.1.

step 2.2step 3.1step 4.1∎

Remarks

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

52 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources