Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-14
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Uniform convexity gives unique asymptotic centers

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice ACω. Let X be a real or complex uniformly convex Banach space, let (xn)nN be a bounded sequence in X, and let CX be nonempty, norm closed and convex. Define its asymptotic-radius function on C by

r(y):=lim supnxny(yC).

Then there is a unique cC such that

r(c)=infyCr(y).

The point c is the asymptotic center of (xn) relative to C. Convexity uses real coefficients even when X is complex.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: X, (xn) and C as in the statement, with R:=infyCr(y) once that real infimum has been justified.

[F1]

For a bounded real sequence, its limit superior is the real infimum of its real tail suprema. If its limit superior is the real number L, then for every η>0 its terms are eventually less than L+η (Limit superior and limit inferior of a real sequence as infnsupknxk and supninfknxk in R, For finite L: L=lim supxk iff for every ε>0 one has xk<L+ε eventually and xk>Lε frequently).

[F2]

Every nonempty subset of R bounded below has a real infimum (Every nonempty set bounded below has an infimum).

[F3]

ACω supplies one member of each member of a sequence of nonempty sets (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)).

[F4]

For every real η>0 there is an integer N1 with 1/N<η (For every ε>0 in a complete ordered field there is a natural n1 with 1/n<ε).

[F5]

Uniform convexity says that for each θ(0,2] there is δ>0 such that unit-ball vectors separated by at least θ have midpoint norm at most 1δ (Uniformly convex Banach space).

[F6]

Every norm-Cauchy sequence in X converges in X (Banach space).

[F7]

A closed subset of a metric space contains the limit of each convergent sequence in it (A point lies in the closure of A iff some sequence in A converges to it, and a set is closed iff it is sequentially closed, using its choice-free closed-to-sequentially-closed direction).

[F8]

Convexity keeps real midpoints in C, also in a complex normed space (Convex sets and continuous real-hyperplane separation in a normed space).

[F9]

Canonical positive naturals increase with their indices, and inversion reverses strict inequalities between positive elements. Consequently 1/(j+1)0 (Canonical naturals are positive and strictly increasing, Inverses of positives are positive, and reciprocation reverses order).

Proof

1.1

Choose B0 with xnB for every n. For each yC, 0xnyB+y, so [F1] makes r(y) a finite nonnegative real. Thus {r(y):yC} is nonempty and bounded below by zero, and [F2] defines a finite real R0.

givenF1F2
2.1

The function r is 1-Lipschitz. Indeed, fix y,zC and η>0. By [F1], eventually xnz<r(z)+η, and then xnyxnz+zy<r(z)+zy+η. The corresponding tail supremum, and hence its infimum r(y), is at most r(z)+zy+η. If r(y)>r(z)+zy, [F4] supplies a positive reciprocal smaller than that gap, contradicting this inequality. Hence r(y)r(z)+zy; exchanging y,z gives r(y)r(z)yz.

step 1.1F1F4
2.2

For jN put Ej:={yC:r(y)<R+1/(j+1)}. Each Ej is nonempty by the defining greatest-lower-bound property of R. Applying [F3] once to this countable family produces a sequence (yj) with yjEj for every j. This is the proof's exact use of ACω.

step 1.1F2F3
3.1

Suppose first that R=0. Given ε>0, [F4] and [F9] give a threshold J such that 1/(j+1)<ε/8 for jJ. For j,kJ, [F1] gives one index n beyond the two eventual thresholds at tolerance ε/8. Then yjykyjxn+xnyk<r(yj)+r(yk)+ε/4<ε/2. Thus (yj) is Cauchy when R=0.

step 2.2F1F4F9
3.2

Now suppose R>0, and fix ε>0. Put θ:=min{1,ε/(R+1)}(0,1]. Choose the δ>0 from [F5], replace it by δ0:=min{δ,1/2}, and set a:=min{1/2,Rδ0/2}>0,t:=R+a. Then t<R+1 and t(1δ0)<R. By [F4] and [F9], for all sufficiently large j,k one has r(yj),r(yk)<t. If such j,k also satisfied yjykε, [F1] would give a common tail on which both xnyj<t and xnyk<t. On that tail the vectors un:=xnyjt,vn:=xnykt belong to the unit ball and satisfy unvn=yjyk/t>ε/(R+1)θ. Uniform convexity therefore gives xnyj+yk2=tun+vn2t(1δ0) throughout that tail. The midpoint lies in C by [F8], and [F1] now yields r((yj+yk)/2)t(1δ0)<R, contradicting the definition of R. Consequently yjyk<ε for all sufficiently large j,k; (yj) is Cauchy also when R>0.

step 2.2F1F4F5F8F9
4.1

By [F6] there is cX with yjc, and [F7] gives cC. The lower-bound property gives Rr(c). Conversely, the Lipschitz estimate gives r(c)r(yj)+cyj<R+1/(j+1)+cyj for every j. If r(c)>R, [F4], [F9] and convergence make the sum 1/(j+1)+cyj smaller than this positive gap for some j, a contradiction. Hence r(c)=R, so a minimizer exists.

step 2.1step 2.2step 3.1step 3.2F4F6F7F9
4.2

To prove uniqueness, let c,dC both have radius R. If R=0 and cd, take η=cd/3 in [F1]; at one sufficiently large n the triangle inequality gives cd<2η, a contradiction. If R>0 and cd, repeat step 3.2 with ε=cd, the same θ,δ0,a,t, and the two fixed points c,d. Their radii equal R<t, so [F1] again gives a common tail, while [F5] makes the radius of their midpoint at most t(1δ0)<R. By [F8] that midpoint lies in C, the same contradiction. Thus c=d.

step 1.1step 3.2F1F5F8
5.1

Steps 4.1 and 4.2 give the asserted unique asymptotic center. The zero space is included: its only nonempty subset is the singleton {0} and the radius is zero. A singleton C is likewise immediate. The argument uses only real norms and real midpoints, so it is unchanged over complex scalars. The set C is expressly nonempty; no minimizer is asserted for the empty set.

step 4.1step 4.2

Source notes

Lim defines asymptotic radius and center for decreasing tails of a bounded net in §1, then proves nonemptiness and uniqueness for closed convex subsets of uniformly convex Banach spaces in Proposition 1 and Theorem 1 on printed pp. 422–423. The local proof is independent and makes its Countable Choice use explicit.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

51 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources