How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced — the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted — a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated — a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The Riemann Integral in R^m and Jordan Content: Examples and Counterexamples
1 · Prerequisites
- Binary Operations, Monoids, Groups and Subgroups
- Compactness in Metric Spaces
- Completeness, Completion, and Uniform Continuity
- Construction of the Natural Numbers
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Cauchy Sequences
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Dedekind Cuts
- Continuity, IVT, EVT, and Uniform Continuity
- Countability and Uncountability
- Filters and Ultrafilters
- Foundations of the Real Numbers for Analysis
- Limits of Real Functions
- limsup, liminf, and Subsequential Limits
- Linear Independence, Bases and Dimension
- Linear Transformations, Rank-Nullity and Quotient Spaces
- Metric Spaces
- Monotone Functions, Discontinuities, and Continuity Sets
- Monotone Sequences, Bolzano-Weierstrass, and Cauchy Completeness
- Order, Zorn's Lemma, and the Axiom of Choice
- Relations, Functions, and Quotients
- Rings, Subrings, Integral Domains and Fields
- Rⁿ as a Normed Space; Vector-Valued Functions
- Roots, Rational Powers, and Classical Inequalities
- Sequences and Limits
- Series: Convergence and the Nonnegative Tests
- Suprema and Infima
- The Cantor Set, Baire Category, and Measure Zero in ℝ
- The Riemann Integral in Rᵐ and Jordan Content
- The Riemann Integral: Definition and Integrability
- The ZFC Axioms and the Basic Set Constructions
- Topology of ℝ
- Vector Spaces, Linear Subspaces, Span and Direct Sums
2 · Summary
3 · Logical flowchart
4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs
None yet.
5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements
The unit box in has volume , and the integral of a constant over it is
Example
For , , and for every constant , .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: and constant .
Rectangle volume is the finite product of side lengths (Axis-parallel rectangles in and their volume).
Darboux sums and the integral are Lower and upper Darboux sums over a grid partition in and The lower and upper Darboux integrals over a nondegenerate rectangle in .
Verification
Every side has length , so the finite product volume is .
On every cell, both infimum and supremum of the constant function are . Thus both sums are .
Lower and upper integrals therefore both equal .
The rational points of form a bounded null set that is not Jordan measurable
Statement refuted
Every bounded null subset of is Jordan measurable.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: .
and are countable ( is countably infinite, , Finite, countably infinite, countable, uncountable).
Rationals and irrationals are dense (Both and are dense in , and every nonempty open subset of is uncountable).
Jordan measurability is equivalent to a null boundary (A bounded set in is Jordan measurable iff its boundary is null, equivalently of content zero).
Counterexample
The set is countable by [L1]. Enumerate its points and cover the -th singleton by a square with volume below ; countable-union closure gives nullity.
By [L2], both and its complement are dense at every point of the unit square, so .
The unit square has content , by The unit box in has volume , and the integral of a constant over it is and A bounded set is Jordan measurable iff its indicator is Riemann integrable, and the integral is its Jordan content, hence is not null (For compact subsets of , measure zero and content zero coincide).
The boundary criterion [L3] makes non-Jordan-measurable, despite nullity.
The Smith–Volterra–Cantor slab is compact and not Jordan measurable
Statement refuted
Every compact bounded subset of is Jordan measurable.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The Smith-Volterra-Cantor set and .
is compact, nowhere dense, and every finite interval cover has total length at least (The Smith-Volterra-Cantor set: the same construction removing, at stage , an open middle interval of length from each of the remaining intervals, The Smith-Volterra-Cantor set is compact, perfect and nowhere dense, and does not have measure zero).
The product lower bound is If every finite interval cover of has total length at least , then every rectangle cover of has total area at least .
Counterexample
The slab is closed and bounded, hence compact by Heine-Borel in : with the Euclidean metric a subset of is compact if and only if it is closed and bounded, and the proof by bisection uses no choice principle; the same holds on the real line. Since has empty interior, has empty interior and, being closed, equals its boundary.
By [L1] and [L2], every rectangle cover of has total area at least ; its boundary therefore does not have content zero.
The boundary criterion A bounded set in is Jordan measurable iff its boundary is null, equivalently of content zero makes non-Jordan-measurable.
is bounded and open, but its boundary has positive Jordan outer content
Statement refuted
Every bounded open subset of is Jordan measurable.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: , with the fat Cantor set.
is closed, nowhere dense, and has interval-cover lower bound (The Smith-Volterra-Cantor set: the same construction removing, at stage , an open middle interval of length from each of the remaining intervals, The Smith-Volterra-Cantor set is compact, perfect and nowhere dense, and does not have measure zero).
Counterexample
The set is open, so is open and bounded.
Every neighbourhood of a point of meets , by nowhere density in the first coordinate and the interval factor, and meets the complement. Hence .
Outer content is monotone under inclusion, so [L2] gives the boundary positive outer content.
By A bounded set in is Jordan measurable iff its boundary is null, equivalently of content zero, is not Jordan measurable.
The parabola segment has content zero in
Example
The parabola segment has content zero in .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: on .
Graphs of continuous functions on closed rectangles have content zero (The graph of a continuous function on a closed nondegenerate rectangle in has content zero in ).
Verification
Apply [L2] to the continuous polynomial in [L1].
Directly, divide into equal subintervals. On each one, , so four squares of side cover that graph piece. The resulting finite cover has total area at most , which can be made arbitrarily small.
Both arguments establish content zero.
The right triangle has Jordan content
Example
The triangle is Jordan measurable and has content .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Uniform -by- grids with .
Jordan content equals the indicator integral (A bounded set is Jordan measurable iff its indicator is Riemann integrable, and the integral is its Jordan content).
Each of the three edges is a continuous graph, after exchanging coordinates for the vertical edge, and their finite union has content zero (The graph of a continuous function on a closed nondegenerate rectangle in has content zero in , A bounded set in is Jordan measurable iff its boundary is null, equivalently of content zero).
Verification
Index the grid cells by . A cell is contained in when , while it meets when . Thus the lower staircase has cells and the upper staircase has cells.
Induction gives . Hence the lower area is , the upper area is , and their gap is . Both areas tend to .
Steps 1.1 and 1.2 give inscribed and covering grid approximations converging to , so the inner and outer contents agree at . Alternatively, [L2] gives Jordan measurability from the boundary criterion. In either route, [L1] identifies the common value with the indicator integral.
The Cantor slab has content zero in
Example
For the ordinary Cantor set , the slab has content zero in , and hence Jordan content .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The Cantor set .
has one-dimensional content zero (The Cantor set is compact, perfect, uncountable, nowhere dense and of measure zero, and it contains no interval of positive length, so its only nonempty connected subsets are single points, Measure zero (a countable cover by intervals of total length below every ) and content zero (a finite such cover)).
Integer part: for every real there is exactly one integer with controls the number of equal squares needed to stack across height .
Verification
Given , cover by finitely many positive-width intervals with and sufficiently small. Degenerate members may be enlarged within the budget.
Above , stack squares of side . By [L2], at most squares suffice, with total area at most .
Summing gives at most . Thus the slab has cube-content zero.
By Jordan inner and outer content and Jordan measurable bounded sets in , cube-content zero makes the Jordan outer content . The nonnegative inner content is at most the outer content, so both are ; the slab is Jordan measurable with content , unlike the fat-Cantor slab The Smith–Volterra–Cantor slab is compact and not Jordan measurable.
The term “rectifiable” for Jordan measurable sets is unrelated to rectifiable curves
Remarks
Some multivariable-analysis texts, including Munkres, call a bounded set rectifiable when its boundary has content zero. By A bounded set in is Jordan measurable iff its boundary is null, equivalently of content zero, these are exactly the bounded Jordan measurable sets of Jordan inner and outer content and Jordan measurable bounded sets in .
This terminology is unrelated to rectifiable curves and does not assert finite curve length. It creates no dependency on arc length.
Sources
Standard references
Recommended treatments; not extraction sources.
- J. Lebl, Basic Analysis, Jordan Measurable Sets
- J. Lebl, Basic Analysis, Outer Measure and Null Sets
- J. Lebl, Basic Analysis, Riemann Integral in Several Variables
- A. Treibergs, MATH 3225 final solutions
- Whitman College real analysis notes
- A. Cañez, multivariable calculus notes
- J. Munkres, Analysis on Manifolds, Jordan content terminology