Alphabeta Math
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

✓ 7 results · all verified · 0 also independently AI-judged
Every result on this page is machine-checked by a proof checker and read in full and owner-audited; the judge is an additional, independent cross-model AI review of the proofs. The 7 not AI-judged were verified by owner audit (typically over a confirmed judge false positive), not failures.

The Riemann Integral in R^m and Jordan Content: Examples and Counterexamples

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs

None yet.

5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements

ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-01Open item page →

The unit box in Rm has volume 1, and the integral of a constant c over it is c

Example

For Q=[0,1]m, vol⁡(Q)=1, and for every constant c, ∫Qc=c.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: m≥1 and constant c.

[L1]

Rectangle volume is the finite product of side lengths (Axis-parallel rectangles in Rm and their volume).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1

Every side has length 1, so the finite product volume is 1.

L1given
1.2

On every cell, both infimum and supremum of the constant function are c. Thus both sums are c∑ivol⁡(Qi)=c.

L2given
2.1

Lower and upper integrals therefore both equal c.

step 1.2L2∎
CounterexampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-01Open item page →

The rational points of [0,1]2 form a bounded null set that is not Jordan measurable

Statement refuted

Every bounded null subset of R2 is Jordan measurable.

Facts & Assumptions

Counterexample

technique · direct
1.1

The set E is countable by [L1]. Enumerate its points and cover the j-th singleton by a square with volume below ε2−j−1; countable-union closure gives nullity.

L1given
1.2

By [L2], both E and its complement are dense at every point of the unit square, so ∂E=[0,1]2.

L2given
3.1

The boundary criterion [L3] makes E non-Jordan-measurable, despite nullity.

step 1.1step 2.1L3∎
CounterexampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-01Open item page →

The Smith–Volterra–Cantor slab S×[0,1] is compact and not Jordan measurable

Statement refuted

Every compact bounded subset of R2 is Jordan measurable.

Counterexample

technique · direct
1.1

The slab K is closed and bounded, hence compact by Heine-Borel in Rn: with the Euclidean metric a subset of Rn is compact if and only if it is closed and bounded, and the proof by bisection uses no choice principle; the same holds on the real line. Since S has empty interior, K has empty interior and, being closed, equals its boundary.

L1given
1.2

By [L1] and [L2], every rectangle cover of K has total area at least 1/2; its boundary therefore does not have content zero.

L1L2given
2.1step 1.1step 1.2∎
CounterexampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-01Open item page →

((0,1)∖S)×(0,1) is bounded and open, but its boundary has positive Jordan outer content

Statement refuted

Every bounded open subset of R2 is Jordan measurable.

Counterexample

technique · direct
1.1

The set (0,1)∖S is open, so U is open and bounded.

L1
1.2

Every neighbourhood of a point of S×[0,1] meets U, by nowhere density in the first coordinate and the interval factor, and meets the complement. Hence S×[0,1]⊆∂U.

L1given
2.1

Outer content is monotone under inclusion, so [L2] gives the boundary positive outer content.

step 1.2L2given
ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-01Open item page →

The parabola segment {(x,x2):0≤x≤1} has content zero in R2

Example

The parabola segment {(x,x2):0≤x≤1} has content zero in R2.

Verification

technique · direct
1.1

Apply [L2] to the continuous polynomial in [L1].

L1L2
1.2

Directly, divide [0,1] into N≥1 equal subintervals. On each one, ∣x2−y2∣≤2/ι(N), so four squares of side 1/ι(N) cover that graph piece. The resulting finite cover has total area at most 4/ι(N), which can be made arbitrarily small.

L1given
2.1

Both arguments establish content zero.

step 1.1step 1.2∎
ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-01Open item page →

The right triangle {(x,y)∈[0,1]2:x+y≤1} has Jordan content 1/2

Example

The triangle T={(x,y)∈[0,1]2:x+y≤1} is Jordan measurable and has content 1/2.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Uniform N-by-N grids with N≥1.

[L2]

Each of the three edges is a continuous graph, after exchanging coordinates for the vertical edge, and their finite union has content zero (The graph of a continuous function on a closed nondegenerate rectangle in Rm has content zero in Rm+1, A bounded set in Rm is Jordan measurable iff its boundary is null, equivalently of content zero).

Verification

technique · induction
1.1

Index the grid cells by 0≤i,j<N. A cell is contained in T when i+j≤N−2, while it meets T when i+j≤N. Thus the lower staircase has N(N−1)/2 cells and the upper staircase has (N2+3N−2)/2 cells.

given
1.2

Induction gives ∑k<Nι(k)=ι(N)ι(N−1)/2. Hence the lower area is (N−1)/(2N), the upper area is 1/2+3/(2N)−1/N2, and their gap is 2/N−1/N2<2/N. Both areas tend to 1/2.

baseihgiven
2.1

Steps 1.1 and 1.2 give inscribed and covering grid approximations converging to 1/2, so the inner and outer contents agree at 1/2. Alternatively, [L2] gives Jordan measurability from the boundary criterion. In either route, [L1] identifies the common value with the indicator integral.

step 1.1step 1.2L1L2discharge-induction∎
ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-01Open item page →

The Cantor slab C×[0,1] has content zero in R2

Example

For the ordinary Cantor set C, the slab C×[0,1] has content zero in R2, and hence Jordan content 0.

Verification

technique · constructive
1.1

Given ε>0, cover C by finitely many positive-width intervals Ir with ∑rℓr and max⁡rℓr sufficiently small. Degenerate members may be enlarged within the budget.

L1chooseconstruct
1.2

Above Ir, stack squares of side ℓr. By [L2], at most 1/ℓr+2 squares suffice, with total area at most ℓr+2ℓr2.

L2given
2.1

Summing gives at most ∑rℓr+2(max⁡rℓr)∑rℓr<ε. Thus the slab has cube-content zero.

step 1.1step 1.2given
3.1

By Jordan inner and outer content and Jordan measurable bounded sets in Rm, cube-content zero makes the Jordan outer content 0. The nonnegative inner content is at most the outer content, so both are 0; the slab is Jordan measurable with content 0, unlike the fat-Cantor slab The Smith–Volterra–Cantor slab S×[0,1] is compact and not Jordan measurable.

step 2.1givendischarge-construct∎
RemarkRemark: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicableaudited 2026-08-01Open item page →

The term “rectifiable” for Jordan measurable sets is unrelated to rectifiable curves

Remarks

Some multivariable-analysis texts, including Munkres, call a bounded set rectifiable when its boundary has content zero. By A bounded set in Rm is Jordan measurable iff its boundary is null, equivalently of content zero, these are exactly the bounded Jordan measurable sets of Jordan inner and outer content and Jordan measurable bounded sets in Rm.

This terminology is unrelated to rectifiable curves and does not assert finite curve length. It creates no dependency on arc length.

Sources