How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
FALSE: normalization and the functional equation determine the real Gamma function
Statement
False claim: Gamma is the only positive function satisfying and .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The periodic perturbation of Gamma from the preceding example.
The function is positive, satisfies and , differs from Gamma, and is not log-convex (A positive non-log-convex solution of the Gamma functional equation).
Gamma is the unique positive log-convex function with the normalization and recurrence (Bohr--Mollerup characterisation of the real Gamma function).
Refutation
By [F1], the function is positive, normalized, recurrent, and differs from Gamma.
Fact [F2] identifies the missing hypothesis: log-convexity excludes this and restores uniqueness.
Therefore normalization and the functional equation alone do not determine Gamma.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
14 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- K. Chandrasekharan, Lectures on the Riemann Zeta-Function, Lecture 7 §4 (standard reference, not scraped)