Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (deepseek-v4-pro + gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-08-14
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The Euler–Mascheroni constant and the harmonic asymptotic

Statement

For n≥1, let

Hn=∑k=1n1k,γn=Hn−log⁡n.

The sequence (γn) is strictly decreasing and is bounded below by 1−log⁡2. It therefore converges to a constant γ satisfying 0<γ<1, and

Hn=log⁡n+γ+o(1).

Consequently, Hn/log⁡n→1 as n→∞, with the quotient considered for n≥2.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The sequences (Hn) and (γn) displayed in the statement.

[A1]

For every n≥1, Hn=∑k=1n1/k and γn=Hn−log⁡n.

[L1]

For x>0, log⁡x=∫1xdt/t, and the derivative of log⁡ is 1/x (The natural logarithm has derivative 1/x and equals the integral from 1 to x of 1/t).

[L2]

Let a<b and let f,g:[a,b]→R be integrable. If f(x)≥0 for every x∈[a,b], then ∫abf≥0; if f(x)≤g(x) for every x∈[a,b], then ∫abf≤∫abg; and if m≤f(x)≤M for every x∈[a,b], with m,M real, then m(b−a)≤∫abf≤M(b−a) (If f≤g on [a,b] and both are integrable then ∫abf≤∫abg; and m(b−a)≤∫abf≤M(b−a)).

[L3]

If a<c<b, then a bounded function on [a,b] is integrable there exactly when its restrictions to [a,c] and [c,b] are integrable, and in that case ∫abf=∫acf+∫cbf (For a<c<b: f is integrable on [a,b] if and only if it is integrable on [a,c] and on [c,b], and then ∫abf=∫acf+∫cbf; with the oriented form for arbitrary a,b,c).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

For every n≥1, γn+1−γn=1/(n+1)−∫nn+1dt/t.

A1L1L3algebra
1.2

Splitting the integral at n+1/2 gives ∫nn+1dt/t≥(1/2)/(n+1/2)+(1/2)/(n+1)>1/(n+1).

L2L3algebra
1.3

If n≥2, additivity and 1/t≤1/k on [k,k+1] give log⁡n=log⁡2+∑k=2n−1∫kk+1dt/t≤log⁡2+∑k=2n−11/k, where the sum is empty when n=2; thus γn≥1−log⁡2+1/n>1−log⁡2.

A1L1L2L3algebra
1.4

Splitting [1,2] at 3/2 gives log⁡2=∫12dt/t≤1/2+1/3=5/6<1; in particular, γ1=1≥1−log⁡2>0.

A1L1L2L3algebra
1.5

For every integer m≥1, splitting [1,2m] into [2j,2j+1] gives log⁡(2m)=∑j=0m−1∫2j2j+1dt/t≥∑j=0m−11/2=m/2.

L1L2L3algebra
2.1

Hence γn+1<γn for every n≥1.

step 1.1step 1.2algebra
2.2

Therefore γn≥1−log⁡2 for every n≥1.

step 1.3step 1.4
2.3

It follows that log⁡n→∞. Let m≥1 and n≥2m. If n=2m then log⁡n=log⁡(2m). If n>2m then 1<2m<n, so log⁡n=∫1ndt/t=∫12mdt/t+∫2mndt/t=log⁡(2m)+∫2mndt/t, and 1/t≥0 on [2m,n] makes that last integral nonnegative. Either way log⁡n≥log⁡(2m)≥m/2.

L1L2L3step 1.5algebra
3.1

By monotone convergence, there is a real number γ such that γn→γ.

L4step 2.1step 2.2
3.2

The lower bound and strict decrease give 0<γn≤γ1=1 for every n≥1.

step 1.4step 2.1step 2.2
4.1

Since γ is the infimum of the γn, γ≥1−log⁡2>0; and since the sequence is strictly decreasing, γ≤γ2<γ1=1. Hence 0<γ<1.

step 1.4step 2.1step 2.2step 3.1algebra
4.2

The identity Hn=log⁡n+γn and the convergence γn→γ give Hn=log⁡n+γ+(γn−γ)=log⁡n+γ+o(1).

A1step 3.1algebra
4.3

Consequently, γn/log⁡n→0 as n→∞.

step 2.3step 3.2algebra
5.1

Finally, for n≥2, Hn/log⁡n=1+γn/log⁡n→1.

A1step 4.3algebra∎

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

33 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources