How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The Euler–Mascheroni constant and the harmonic asymptotic
Statement
For , let
The sequence is strictly decreasing and is bounded below by . It therefore converges to a constant satisfying , and
Consequently, as , with the quotient considered for .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The sequences and displayed in the statement.
For every , and .
For , , and the derivative of is (The natural logarithm has derivative 1/x and equals the integral from 1 to x of 1/t).
Let and let be integrable. If for every , then ; if for every , then ; and if for every , with real, then (If on and both are integrable then ; and ).
If , then a bounded function on is integrable there exactly when its restrictions to and are integrable, and in that case (For : is integrable on if and only if it is integrable on and on , and then ; with the oriented form for arbitrary ).
Every nonincreasing real sequence that is bounded below converges to its infimum (A nondecreasing sequence bounded above converges to the supremum of its range, and a nonincreasing sequence bounded below to the infimum).
Proof
For every , .
Splitting the integral at gives .
If , additivity and on give , where the sum is empty when ; thus .
Splitting at gives ; in particular, .
For every integer , splitting into gives .
Hence for every .
Therefore for every .
It follows that . Let and . If then . If then , so , and on makes that last integral nonnegative. Either way .
By monotone convergence, there is a real number such that .
The lower bound and strict decrease give for every .
Since is the infimum of the , ; and since the sequence is strictly decreasing, . Hence .
The identity and the convergence give .
Consequently, as .
Finally, for , .
Depends on
- The natural logarithm has derivative 1/x and equals the integral from 1 to x of 1/t
- If $f \le g$ on $[a,b]$ and both are integrable then $\int_a^b f \le \int_a^b g$; and $m(b-a) \le \int_a^b f \le M(b-a)$
- For $a<c<b$: $f$ is integrable on $[a,b]$ if and only if it is integrable on $[a,c]$ and on $[c,b]$, and then $\int_a^b f = \int_a^c f + \int_c^b f$; with the oriented form for arbitrary $a,b,c$
- A nondecreasing sequence bounded above converges to the supremum of its range, and a nonincreasing sequence bounded below to the infimum
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 86 results over 17 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- W. F. Trench, Introduction to Real Analysis, Exercise 4.3.14 (standard reference, not scraped)